Getting a lot of tataria retards on twitter timelinehow do you argue against them?
>>18454889Just stop following Russhits on Twitter.
>>18454891theyre always in English
>>18454889You don't.
>>18454889Why would you argue against them?
>>18454889THE SOCRATIC METHOD OF INTERROGATION NEVER FAILS TO NULLIFY THOSE IDIOTS; THEY NEVER STOP PUBLISHING THEIR DRIVEL, SINCE MANY OF THEM ACTUALLY MAKE A LIVING FROM THAT, BUT THEIR DEFEAT IS TOTAL, AND, THEIR HUMILIATION, PERMANENT.
>>18454891>>18454903>>18454962ERROR MUST BE CORRECTED, AND LIES SHOULD BE DISPELLED.
>>18454889I love how a large portion of the evidence for their theory is just looking at old buildings and going, "Nah, they couldn't have built that." Like, welp, I guess I can't argue with that. I guess all of history must be a lie because building pretty.
>>18454982I saw a video where the author outright shows images of the construction process and he goes >hmm this might look like evidence that they constructed the building but what's more likely that they actually built it or they faked the images to cover up an ancient civilization?You literally can't falsify their claim
>>18454889you don't(they are right)
>>18454889>how do you argue against them?Start by learning about the actual history of the steppe
>>18454889Why would you want to interact with schizos or worse ragebaiters who know full well why they're wrong but just want a reaction? Are you retarded?
They see the wonders of civilizations built in a era pre internet and because they themselves are incapable of creating anything like it they cope by saying that it was an ancient alien civilization
>>18454889just stop interacting with larpers
More importantly - deboonkers cannot explain drastic enshittification in construction engineering, architecture and art happened globally since "Tartarian" times. Same for Egyptian sphinxes and pyramids, Chinese Wall, megaliths, etc.
>>18454889Ask them for pictures of what the inside of the worlds fair buildings looked like
>>18455661Yes I canits american capitalismshareholder capitalism
>>18454903/thread
