[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: David_Hume.jpg (91 KB, 825x1000)
91 KB JPG
There has never been a solution to the Is-ought problem
>>
>>18464529
Why do you think so? I'm genuinely curious.
>>
>>18464529
No shit? It's only a problem for a thin subset of moral realists who believe in objective morals, but are too cowardly to commit to pure objectivism and reject the notion that subjective things exist in any capacity. Everybody else, including the based retard hardline objectivists, has no problem here.
>>
>>18464529
It was already a truism in Ancient Greece:
>ζῶμεν γὰρ οὐχ ὡς θέλομεν, ἀλλ᾽ ὡς δυνάμεθα



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.