Weird how the more Yamnaya someone has. The less Yamnaya they look. (Assuming the popular Yamnaya facial reconstructions are accurate).
>>18465135All reconstructions look more chad than real pops if they are made by chuds and more nigga if they are made by libs.
>>18465135It's outdated. Nords don't have that much Yamna. Way too much EHG and too little CHG. Their SHG/BHG ancestry gets confused for it.
>>18465190wonder what your ethnic background is
>>18465190No one outside of Indian ethnonarcissists believes this.
Yamnaya were mostly olive/tawny, w/ a minority both lighter & darker individuals. Most would have looked like Southern Europeans/Caucasians, not Indians. Some may have had a bit of a MENA look.CW-related groups would be within the range of variation of modern Western Europeans, w/ a bias towards the darker tones.Phenotype doesn't perfectly correlate w/ ancestry. I don't know why you guys obsess over this stuff and don't even both to learn the basics. Environmental/sexual selection, convergent evolution, founder effects, population bottlenecks, etc. all factors. The current consensus is that among Europeans there was ongoing selection for lighter skin relating to vitamin D synthesis (Neolithic peoples ate less meat and therefore had less vitamin D in their diet, & people living in cold, darker climates got less sunlight & therefore would be still more deficient in vitamin D). Sexual selection also may have been a factor.
>>18465135The Yamnaya were hook nosed steppeniggers that raped entire civilizations out of existence
>>18465190>Nords don't have that much Yamna55% Yes.
>>18465222>Phenotype doesn't perfectly correlate w/ ancestry.Except it does in literally every population we can actually observe. Hence why people have been able to tell what your ancestry is for thousands of years just by the way you look, and why we know all blond hair blue eyed people are descended from the exact same stock of people.
>>18465135They probably just looked like Slavs.
>>18465297>pov: you're a neolithic graincel on the shore of the black sea and the Yamnaya chief gives you the herder stare
>>18465297Balkan peoples seem to have retained yamnaya phenotype, height and lack of brains
>>18465295No, it doesn't, retard, & I don't think you even understand the argument. Fair-skinned Middle Easterners/North Africans w/ blonde hair & blue eyes don't have Crusader DNA. We know from studies of ancient DNA that these traits have existed within these populations for thousands of years, albeit at a lower frequency than groups you might more commonly associate w/ these traits. Likewise, "Black Irish" don't have Iberian DNA or whatever else. They have a typical Irish Genetic profile. They just happen to have dark hair, eyes, & sometimes a relatively darker complexion. This more Southern European look is within the range of variation of Northern Europeans. It just exists necessarily the dominant phenotype. Nikki Haley, despite being broadly "white-passing", doesn't have some rare Sintashta genetic profile. She is 100% Punjab.
>>18465336>It just exists necessarily the dominant phenotype. *just isn't necessarily the dominant phenotype
>>18465295>all blond hair blue eyed people are descended from the exact same stock of people.Literally the most retarded statement ever uttered on this forum. Blonde hair & blues eyes are within the range of variation of many different populations who don't share the same origin. Literally zero intellectual curiosity, absolutely no desire to investigate.
>>18465295Andamanese, despite looking like tropical Africans, are genetically the closest to East & SE Asians. They're not at all related to Sub-Saharan Africans. This is a fact.
>>18465349>Andamanese, despite looking like tropical AfricansThey don't though. One look at their faces and you can tell they are quite different.Pigmentation isn't very informative for genetic distances.
>>18465357Ugh. The point is they have dark brown skin & tropical characteristics usually associated w/ SSAs (wider nasal breadth, thick lips, kinky hair, etc.). And yet they aren't closely related to them & are instead much closer to groups with whom they share less physical similarities.The reason they look like that is because of convergent evolution. They migrated to a tropical region, so over time, they developed more tropical characteristics.
>>18465399>>18465349no one but idiot liberals pretending not to understand race think Andamanese look like Congoloids.You can tell ancestry very accurately by appearance if you have extensive contact.If you have a very low resolution idea of ancestry/race and appearance then obviously youll make mistakes.But even in your example on first contact Europeans thought they were negroids but literally the first time they greeted them personally they recognized they were entirely different.
>>18465412I have never said there is no correlation b/w race/ethnicity & phenotype. I've only said that these things correlate imperfectly, as the examples I've given demonstrate. You just straight up don't understand genetics, and don't appear to have any desire to learn.I don't know why you're harping on this idea that Australo-Melanesian groups look different from SSAs, as if this is supposed to prove something. Obviously. So what? The point is that they don't look like the groups with whom they are more closely related, & they are more physically similar to those with whom they are much, much more distantly related.I'm not going to be continuing this conversation because it's obvious you're fairly stupid & just want to believe in some sort of 1:1 correlation because your retard brain has latched onto the idea that this has some sort of significance to some particular belief or ideology that you feel is threatened by it.
>>18465297>>18465307Slavs have entirely different pigmentation and probably some cranial differences. PIE were Nordic/Mediterraean in cranial form.
>>18466101The Globular Amphora culture is characterized by light pigmentation. The Germanic peoples have some admixture from this group, and they were depigmented Mediterraneans. The Slavs trace their origins to the Trzciniec culture and have more Mesolithic Eastern European ancestry (the Balts have the highest proportion of WHG in Europe, while the Slavs have a significant amount of EHG).
>>18465222>Most would have looked like Southern Europeans/Caucasiansin pigmentation perhaps, not facial structure
>>18465135>>18465137The evidence is all there for the Aesir-Vanir War (Titanomachia) being a battle between coastal traders who were losing their homeland due to erosion versus steppe expansionists starting to capitalize on horse chariot innovations. The "winners" of this merger-war became the Yamnaya.in other words, norse myth is completely vindicated and reliable.
>>18466830>norse myth is completely vindicated and reliable.Wouldn't the Aesir be the historical losers while they are the mythological winners?
>>18466402>The Globular Amphora culture is characterized by light pigmentationNo, it's not. Go back to xiiterMajority of the samples resembled "Mediterranean" aka Majority of Brown hair and Brown eyes in fact, we actually knows that the appearance of such traits among europeans weren't due migration X or people Y but selection in MBA.Nice try
>>18466692They were slavs with med skin tones
>>18466853which is exactly how the Osirians portray themselves by never admitting defeat by outsiders in their records.The Osirians of egypt btw came into Egypt from Morocco... via the coastal EEF migration from Iberia...which is completely in-line with the post post and picrel.EEF migration (suncow mythos of norse myth) moved counter-clockwise through europe before ending up in Egypt.tldr;never admitting defeat is a sedentary EEF coping technique.
