Why do communist movements that achieve power tend to be nationalistic.Isn't that like, fascism?
It is but they still claim that the next time it’ll work (it won’t).Also the photo of Che’s corpse is owned by gettyimages lol
>>18465358>communism fascism tomato tomatoe thread #409527>>18465371I thought it would be "It's never been tried" or "It's not real communism"?
>>18465358Because brownoid turd world revolutionaries rarely even read the source material. They just want to kill and do violence and "class-struggle" is a neat cover up. Che is an exception.
> Che> Nationalistlemme get this straight, argentine, cuban, congolese or bolivian nationalist?
>>18465358Because most Communist movements or Revolutions took place in contexts of National Struggle against Empires
>>18465358The goal of all communist is to form a vanguard party to lead a violent revolution in order to take over the state. This is because they have a core belief that modern liberal democracies are bullshit (because they can never win in them) so revolution is the only alternative. After taking control of the state, the vanguard party must assume totalitarian control of the state through the process of eliminating all rival political parties and making only the one official communist party the legal one. This immediately creates a chimera where the party, the state, and all industry, commerce, and banking, is consolidated into one entity. The vaguard, after assuming control of this new chimera, then becomes paranoid against any and all counter-revolutionaries who would seek to up end their power, which they obtained through violence. This means the state must uses terror and violence to beat the population into submission and acceptance of their rule. Because of this, blind obiednce to the state (ie nationalism) becomes a must. Fascism and Communism are kissing cousins and the Fascist movement was born out of it. Mussolini and Gentile were both Marxist.