>>18466413
no because the Christians were not sent back too.

Collapse of the USSR
Mexican get raped
Israel soon too

>>18466413
Yes. The Arabs are actually some of the worst and most hypocritical colonizers out there. Go to Morocco and you'll find Berbers who still speak their native tongue and have almost entirely indigenous genes insist on Arabizing themselves. It's no different than an indio perfecting his Spanish and LARPing on here as a Tradcath.

>>18466413
No that would be India. We defeated the greatest empire in the world at that time and decolonized an entire subcontinent.

>>18466413
Both the people that came before and after Muslim rule were not native to Iberia

The only autochtonous people are the basque, this was but a intercolonial conflict between germanic and berber invaders

nah it's probably the 1952 Egyptian revolution, giving back control to Egyptians after millennia of foreign rule

>>18466460
You didn't defeat shit, the UK bankrupted itself fighting against Germany in two World Wars and was forced to abandon pajeetland by their debtholders (Jews and Americans). If the World Wars never happened India would still be under British control today and Gandhi would be nothing more than an historical footnote.

>>18467514
It’s worse than that. Pajeets were not conquered because they were rivals, but just so that their biomass could be used to produce the economic and military power needed to fight Europeans. The history of colonialism is every other race in the world being humiliated so the white man could kill other white men better.

>>18466460
I am sorry but no. The British kind of just packed up and left and them doing so led to an event were many people died. If anything there's critique the British were to hasty and sloppy in leaving