>"If our priests don't fuck the asses of those young boys, what should they fuck?"How do you respond without sounding protestant, /his/?
>>18466481You say:"Much as hyperdulia does not constitute worship, nor do the acts of the priests with boys constitute intercourse. For the priesthood have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom. Now none would affirm that a eunuch may engage in intercourse. While the accidents of the act may in their outer form resemble intercourse, the essence of a priest is that of a eunuch and thus this cannot be said.Thus, for a priest to be with a boy cannot in any sense be called intercourse. Adoration of the virgin boys is not worship but exploratio cloacarius, just as adoration of the Blessed Virgin is not worship but hyperdulia."
>>18466481The current pope looks so satanic and evil, like unironically look at his face. At least the previous one, as dumb as he was, was still "good". This one shits on Christian nations like the USA even though the actions of the government, specially when it comes to war, are done because of our devotion to God
>>18466581the one before the previous looked the most evil
>>18466481Just let members of the clergy marry again. Many Popes had wives and children and mistresses and it wasn't an issue.
this might come off as fucked up but at least catholic priests have the weight of having to be celibatewhat is the school teachers and protestant pastors' "excuse"
>>18466702This anon gets it. Those priests earned them boys.
>>18466581The current pope is satanic and evil from denouncing a jewish supremacist cannibalistic baby fucking regime from mass murdering innocents in Iran Palestine and Lebanon?Jews and their amerimutt golems even attacked knights hospitalier a peaceful organization giving medical aid to refugees
>>18466581Iran was TWO WEEKS away
>>18466481>howgo fuck the goats achmed>>>/pol/534643328>>>/pol/534590731>>>/pol/534659901
>>18466481The pedophilia problem would reduce by 80% if the Church just vetted seminaries to prevent homosexuals from becoming priests. As long as the vast majority of priests and priest candidates continue to be gay the problem is not going anywhere
>>18466581>Christian nations like the USAGood one.
>>18467487Let them have sex with women lol>>18466581Directly confronting the pax judaica/ pseudo- rome (US-israeli alliance) of the world to preserve the integrity of his religion is more admirable than whatever that previous pope was doing with his gay prides and "how are you doing fellow libs?"It caused a lot of seethe amongst the evangelicals because it decoupled religion from the narratives of the elites.
>>18467550francis impotently bitched about israel as well
>>18467554All the Pope has to say is that Israel is not a legitimate state, God broke the covenant giving them the right to dwell in the land, and any Catholic who supports Zionism is committing heresy and will be excommunicated. The Israelis would probably confiscate their property but I doubt they’d be stupid enough to kill anyone. This 100% comes down to money.
>>18467560>All the Pope has to say is that Israel is not a legitimate state, God broke the covenant giving them the right to dwell in the land, and any Catholic who supports Zionism is committing heresy and will be excommunicatedAnd has pope chicano done that yet
>>18467565No, and no Pope ever will because they’re all a bunch of limp wristed power hungry nerds.
>>18466481Shalom.
>>18466481I still find it funny how everyone fixates on the rapes when the entire point of the scandal wasn't that some priests diddle little boys, but instead that the Catholic church protected and hid those kiddie diddler priests instead of kicking them out and helping to arrest them.
>>18467607it's just an amusing way to bait the resident e-caths 2bh
>>18467607Why should the church be singled out for doing what the "experts" told them to?>It is true that in the sexually freewheeling seventies and eighties there was too much complacency about the dangers of child abuse. It is also true that, much like the rest of society, the Archdiocese of Boston placed too much faith in the curative powers of psychological treatment for child molesters. What the Boston Globe did not reveal was that it too had heavily supported such treatments — and lobbied for their funding.>A good example of this is a front-page article on June 18, 1992 which ran: “A new generation of treatment programs for sex offenders is proving highly effective, dramatically reducing the percentage of cases in which offenders repeat sex crimes, research shows.” The laudatory article that followed claimed sharp declines in recidivism rates. It continued: “While there is no complete ‘cure’ for sex offenders the new findings indicate that many of them can learn to manage their aberrant sexual impulses without committing new crimes.”>Again the Boston Globe’s hypocrisy here is striking. For a decade after first promoting psychological treatment for offenders, the Globe was excoriating the Church for doing what the paper had been advocating itself at the time.https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/06/14/spotlight-on-double-standards-at-the-boston-globe/
>>18466581Go to bed, Donald.
