>pope said the HRE was roman, therefore only the descendants of the HRE can be the new romeSo the catholic church canonically cucked meds and latin america out of the rome larp?
>>18467534The Spanish Empire conquered so much territory under the reign of HRE Charles V, so no.
>>18467547>The Austrian Empire is considered the legal, territorial, and political successor to the HREyou lost sanchez
>>18467534go fuck the goats achmed
>>18467556Do you feel satisfied with your life? Why are you posting about this shit?
>>18467562>senoooooor you must be muslim o algo
>>18467563thank you for accepting defeat senooor
>>18467534Yes, the HRE was indeed the legitimate successor to the Roman Empire. It may be argued that in 1806, France under Napoleon became the New Rome for a spell, since Francis II himself dissolved the HRE and Napeleon had been legitimized by the Pope some years earlier.With Napoleon's defeat, the best claim to Rome's succession was then resting with the German confederation which was basically the HRE reborn. In 1871, the (Prussian) German Empire rightfully inherited the claim by virtue of military victory over the Habsburg pretenders.Finally, in 1918 with the defeat and disgrace of the last German Caesars (aka "Kaiser"), the new legitimate successor to Rome became the American Republic, which from that point onwards only further grew into its new position and has held onto it to the present day.I hope this has cleared things up for you.
