so atheists, can you definitively prove atheism is true? oh yes you've quite criticized the abrahamic position for their falsities..however, you've never proven yours beyond any reasonable doubt
>no responseI accept your concession
The unreality of anything humans might want to call a god flew over my house last week. I saw the absence of the gods with my own two eyes. Are you going to call me a liar?
>>18468643I mean, yeah, you could be misinformed
The burden of proof is on christcucks.Also, by pretending not to be a christcuck despite obviously being one, you committed blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. Hope you enjoy getting raped in the ass by demons.
>>18468655There is no burden of proof, neither side has any evidence for or against God.. there was a Big Bang though, and that was a creation force.
>>18468657>There is no burden of proofThat's what retards say when it's on them.
Theists have the burden of proof and, before that, the even greater burden of providing a clear definition of what they're claiming exists.
>>18468706Theists do provide clear definitions. The problem is that atheists want strong material evidence while we barely have such evidence for our own consciousness, let alone for a being that is beyond time and space itself. Agnosticism is the only rational perspective on the matter.
>>18468358God's nonexistence can be directly observed with the unassisted human eye.
>>18468811Prove it
>>18468358Man creates god, god doesn't create man. The best predictor of what religion you'll join isn't based on anything like truth, but location. You're way more likely to be the religion of the people around you.It's just fiction that's survived because it fit nicely with the evolutionary traits that we had from survival.>>18468797Definitions with no basis in reality aren't clear definitions.>"Muh gawd is the prime/unmoved mover"Great, just provide the evidence that there was ever a M1(movement 1) and that your god cause M1 to happen.You literally have no evidence, and all god definitions are just Trust Me Bros.It's no different if you try to say that your god is the "necessary being", or any other philosophical god concept.>a being that is beyond time and space itselfYour god existed never and nowhere. Welcome to atheism. You don't realize that people pushed your god concept so far away, that it no longer exists.Something outside of spacetime, will have no causal powers to do anything within spacetime. I'm not interested in your special pleading for a god that has no evidence either. I don't want to hear about your Trust Me Bro about how the immaterial mind with omni-power/knowledge/love/goodness/etc can somehow interact with the universe, while being outside the universe, but also being literally everywhere within the universe, and at every moment of time during the universe.
>>18468358Atheism can be practiced even if there are gods, you just don't accept them.
>>18468358Why would I need to do that? The way I come to believe things is that the evidentiary support for that thing passes my epistemic bar. I have no idea why you retards suddenly want me to apply completely different criteria for belief if and only if the topic is whether god exists.
>>18469201All these words and you couldn't even bother to read the end of my comment. Also, their definitions for what they claim to exist are by the definition of the word definition, definitions. Disagreeing with them does not change that.
>>18468358It's easy: there is no need for god in scientific theories, thus the god hypothesis should be rejected.
>>18469201On the contraire, maybe man evolved to believe in a god because god is real>>18469235Atheism is a belief that god doesn't exist, so you need to prove this claim lil atheist
>>18469258>Atheism is a belief that god doesn't existYes.>so you need to prove this claim lil atheistReread my last post and actually engage with the point I'm making there, low IQ anon.
>>18469285>Reread my last post and actually engage with the point I'm making there, low IQ anon.Ok? You still need to prove, scientifically, there is no god.
>>18469285What you think I'm just gonna let you walk out of this thread without any proofs and an assurance that I, too, should believe your claim?
