[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: C2_2_updated.jpg (106 KB, 500x547)
106 KB JPG
I haven't seen any rebuttal to the white nationalist argument that black people had it better under segregation and colonialism and that their areas and communities are so fucked up now because segregation ended. South Africa is often cited as an evidence.

Do people not respond to this because they consider it to be not worthy of a response? because there is no answer and the white nationalists are correct or what?
>>
>>18468506
South Africa was a third world country but with communist level surveillance and internal controls for the black majority. it wasn't paradise.
>>
>>18468506
> segregation
Debatable.

> colonialism
No.
>>
File: negro2.jpg (1.93 MB, 1500x7900)
1.93 MB JPG
>>18468506
>rebuttal
part 1
>>
File: rising1.jpg (3.75 MB, 3000x7000)
3.75 MB JPG
>>18468506
>rebuttal
part 2
>>
File: white3.jpg (2.75 MB, 2200x7000)
2.75 MB JPG
>>18468506
>rebuttal
part 3
>>
File: melting1.jpg (2.54 MB, 1900x7800)
2.54 MB JPG
>>18468506
>rebuttal
part 4



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.