Could the Americans have succeeded without the support of the French?
>>18468637The Ancien Regime put itself into debt over this, so France's contributions were assumingly enormous, as for a war without France's entry, well, it would've been more difficult to achieveBut Britain didn't really have the logistics on their side as, once they landed in the colonies, they were mostly opposed..
In the centuries since the Revolutionary War, French contributions have been criminally downplayed. Somewhere between the real Yorktown and Mel Gibson's rather less accurate version, The Patriot, the monumental French war effort during the birth of America got forgotten, buried in the sand, and pissed on.The truth is, the 13 colonies would never have earned their freedom without French intervention -- the whole battle for American independence was essentially a proxy war between Britain and France.France began providing arms and ammunition as early as 1776. In early 1777, months before Saratoga, the French sent American colonists 25,000 uniforms and pairs of boots, hundreds of cannons, and thousands of muskets -- all stuff that the colonists would've had a hard time surviving without, and all stuff they had no access to on their own.France provided a whopping 90 percent of the rebels' gunpowder. Without France, the entire American Revolution would have devolved into a bunch of dudes swinging their muskets as clubs within weeks.Still, the most important French contribution to the revolution was the least visible to Americans. As mentioned, the reason France pampered the Patriots was always selfish. They were out to weaken the British forces -- particularly their naval strength -- in order to take the fight to them, perhaps even conquer them. That's why, for much of the Revolutionary War, the British ships tasked with kicking America's ass had to survive 12 rounds with the French navy before they could even think of crossing the Atlantic. France gleefully fought the British, eventually teaming up with Spain, declaring a war, attacking from all sides, and even setting up an invasion force.So, when the Colonial army was fighting for dear freedom, history books tend to conveniently forget that they did so with French money, equipment, and backup forces, while France and its other allies were busy pummeling the empire from every other side.
>>18468665>and backup forcesHow important were those? Did the French significantly participate in the fighting? Or was their support mostly financial?
>>18469421What do you think?
>>18468665this. not even much of a push to say that France literally used a rebellion in America as a proxy war against England, rather than it being its own thing.
>>18468637The set of situations that lead up to the revolutionary war were a long series of things, the seven years war is a prelude to the revolutionary war and prepares and sets the scene for that, the french navy is not able to beat the british navy outside of yorktown during the revolutionary war but was strong enough to prevent the british army at yorktown from being relieved or resupplied
>>18468637French assistance was the last needed push. It was effectively over after Saratoga, France entering and being there to cut off Cornwallis just ensured it ended faster.
