Turkey is decolonizing its history.Crusades were INVASIONS, not just military campaigns. They were directed at the native peoples of West Asia.
>>18472976>They were directed at the native peoples of West Asia.They were to preserve the light of God from destruction by defeating the dark hell-spawned demons who seek to destroy them. Dark hell-spawned demons aren't "native" anywhere outside the jungles of India and the sub-Saharan regions of africa
>>18472976>Crusades were crusader invasions>Turks are present in anatolia because... STOP ASKING OR I HIT YOUTurks gonna turk.
>>18472986Turks are Trojans
Okay, and? Turks only occupy Anatolia because they invaded it and brutally subjugated it. What's more, this invasion was directly responsible for provoking the Crusades in the first place. Fucking Turk-roaches.
>seljuk turks seize christian lands>torture inhabitants to death by nailing their intestines to poles and forcing them to walk around them so they unravel>crusaders drive them out>NOOO WE WERE INVADEDIs Morocco going to refer to the reconquista as the Spanish invasion next? Are Pakistanis going to refer to the arrest of their rape gangs as the British invasion?>INSHALLAHA SALAM ALLAH AKBAR WE ARE THE VICTIMS*explodes*We should allow Muslims to do these things to Israel, but afterwards the Muslims have to go, lol. It is long overdue. The 19th century orientalist fetish and mistaken assumption their fanaticism is a form of moralism and true devotion is the only reason the white man allowed them to exist.
Wish the Mongols became Nestorian, helped the crusaders and the Turks lost the battle of Ankara.
>>18472998>Is Morocco going to refer to the reconquista as the Spanish invasion next? Are Pakistanis going to refer to the arrest of their rape gangs as the British invasion?They already are.Honestly, you should understand how muslims work by now. They think that your are comitting a crime against them by virtue of existing as a nonmuslim.
>>18472997>Turks only occupy Anatolia because they invaded it and brutally subjugated it.And? So did the people who lived there before turks conquered it.
>>18473007And arabs were only in the levant because they conquered it, so by that logic the crusades weren't bad either.
>>18473010Levantines are arabized not arabs, and crusades were done by euroach colonizers who wanted to kill the natives and replace them with euroach settlers
>>18473014Not true, they wanted to rechristianize them (and did, where they ruled.)
>>18472994Trojans were in northern Europe, probably Finland. Some speculate St. Petersburg. Schliemann was a renowned grifter that had to flea Germany twice for being a conman.
>>18473019Yeah they wanted to rechristianize the lands by importing euroach settlers
>>18473028There's no evidence of said resettlement. They settled only their soldiers because they had nowhere to go and granting land to one's fighting men is how government worked back in Europe. The vast majority of the subjects of the Crusader states were Levantine people.
>>18472976The only Turkish history in the Levant is as an Imperial power, long after the Crusades.
>>18472997>Turks only occupy Anatolia because they invaded it and brutally subjugated it. Actually they were invited. The Emperor himself loved Turks so much he settled them as far as the Danube.
>>18473019>>18473028>>18473046They wanted to control Jerusalem purely for piety and prestige.
>>18473046>>Immigration from Catholic Europe was continuous till the end of the crusader states. Although most colonists settled in the coastal cities, the Franks' presence is documented in more than 200 villages (about 15% of all rural settlements) in the Kingdom of Jerusalem.[251][252] Some Frankish rural settlements were planned villages, established to encourage settlers from the West; some were shared with native Christians. The native Jewish population was concentrated in the four holy cities of Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed and Tiberias. From the late 12th century refugees from territories lost to the Muslims increased the Christian population of the coastal cities, but emigration to Cyprus or Frankish Greece can also be detected. The expansion of the urban population is most obvious at Acre where a new suburb developed following the Third Crusade. Emigration from Outremer intensified from the 1240s as prospects of the crusader states' survival darkened.[253] In this period, a massive influx of Frankish and native Christian refugees to Cyprus is well documented. Franks who did not flee could survive the Mamluk conquest as slaves or renegades: a Franciscan friar met with Frankish prisoners of war and converts to Islam at Acre more than a decade after the fall of the city.[254]There weren't many catholics in the region, most mena christians were orthodox who they considered distrustful and thats why they sought to replace them
Turks are being replaced by Kurds as we speak, Turkish nationalism is a fading people’s death throes
>The crusades were a white kkkracker colonizer INVASION to butcher us proud noble Turks (who have always lived there since troy n shit). And it's imperative we alter all of our textbooks NOW to better reflect our view on these events from 900 years ago.>The armenian genocide? What's that? It's not even strictly an Islamic thing Turks are just that delusional and arrogant.
>>18473108You, on this very board, deny or justify slavery, genocide, and etcetera atrocities against non-white people committed by whites. Why are you moralfagging about Turks? Because they're talking shit about precious wypipo?
>>18473114I don't do any of those things and don't put words in my mouth you disgusting, pupating insect. I'm "moralfagging" about Turks because just like Japanese people, Russian people, and Indians they refuse to even acknowledge that the horrible shit they've done ever took place. White countries typically have, and teach younger generations about the horrors of, for example, the international slave trade. Do Turks educate their youth about the bloody swathe their people cut across Anatolia and the Balkans over the centuries? Of course not. The sex slavery and kidnapping, the ethnic cleansings, all ignored because Turks are generally incapable of introspection.
>>18473014>Levantines are arabized not arabs, and crusades were done by euroach colonizers who wanted to kill the natives and replace them with euroach settlersBased killers of asiatic turkroach savages
>>18473124Japs did nothing wrong and they're based but the rest are savages
>>18472976>decolonizingYawn. More resentment ideology.
>>18472976>our invasions... le good!>the invasions that were requested by the people we were invading to drive us back... le bad!Classic t*rkroaches.
>>18473179>Iserali >brown peopleHmmm
>>18473184Turks are the most hypocritical people in existence. Ubernationalist for their own country while being opposed to any expression of nationalism in the foreign countries they inhabit.
It is overral correctThe crusades were nothing but zionist 1.0, settler colonialization attempt of afro-asiatic lands
>>18473330The Crusades were a third-worldist uprising by proletarian revolutionaries liberating the colonised Holy Lands from proto-fascist bourgeois settler colonists.
>>18473335Bullshit inversion of reality, crusaders were the colonialists and were funded by jewish italian merchants
>>18473344>>18473330You are Muslim rape baby
>Crusades were INVASIONS, not just military campaigns.if you laugh you go to hell
>>18473050Denying they invaded is kind of downplaying their military abilities. I rather people just say "yes, it's spear won land" than try to appeal to some liberal notion of fairness
>>18473344The Crusaders massacred the Jews en masse when they took Jerusalem.
>>18472976not only that they were cannibalistic barbarians who slaughtered civilians including women and children
>>18473938But enough about Turks.
I don't see anything wrong with calling the Crusades, the Reconquista, Muslim conquests, and Turkish conquests all as invasions. I get it that there's a bunch of hypocritical double standards that some hold but why does it seem like everyone ITT is acting as if one can't just agree that they are all invasions?pic unrelated
>>18473179KEK
>>18473128>Le epick based anime land!!!
>>18472976Are they also gonna talk about the turk invasion of Anatolia?
>>18473330Wtf i love jews now
>>18472976The Crusades were literally a response to Muslim imperialism
>>18473124Cockroaches don't pupate, they just repeatedly molt.
>>18473114>>18473124South African Black, Chinese and Israeli denying too
>>18474020no, try again
>>18472976>Anatolia was Christian and part of those invaderswelp, are they gonna admit they were invaders, or are the gonna use the yellow chink card because they now have 10% turkic admixture?
Crusaders were nothing but zionist depraved scumI'm glad Baybars ended them
>>18474370You Indians lose a lot of izzat when you open your mouths online
>>18474303>leftist makes fake history documentary slandering his countryShocker, they do that everywhere.
Wait until they find out about the Seljuk Turks invasion of Anatolia.
>>18472976Crusades were self defence
>>18472976Its litterally true tho.Especially when the crusades were just [insert albino Europid localization of some Bilibical Jewish name] only left his verdant fields and white peasant whippings because the pope cooked up in his head hed gain prestige and gree ticket to heaven if he left to "reconquer" the Sacracen lands. Hard to believe the "4 the Christian faith n shiet" yo argument when Latin crusaders regularly slaughtered and pillage eastern Christian lands en route.
>>18474374Us Pakistanis are Iranic not South Asian sir
>>18474303
>>18472976>Crusades were INVASIONS, not just military campaigns.I dont understand the difference.
>>18475509Sounds about English
>>18474655
They're right the crusades were just early extractive colonisation with dehumanising anti islamic talking points promoting sectarian violence in a multicultural hub were christianity was thriving outside of the catholic stranglehold.
so in the muslim world do they actually believe this shit do they not know all that land belong to the byzantines for centuries?
>>18475579implying the muslims werent doing the exact same thing lol
>>18475597Christianity have only declined in the middle east ever since the fall of the Ottoman empire and the presence of the west in the region.
>>18473025According to Italian researcher Felice Vinci, the Trojan War was basically Estonian-Finnish conflict.
The first crusade was an armed pilgrimage. The overwhelming majority of crusaders went back home after Jerusalem had been taken.Also the local population in the near-east were still majority chrisitan at this time. The Caliphate deliberately did not force conversions because the christian population was a critical source of income through taxes because they werent muslim.
Reminder, the crusades werent lost. The powers that be had already moved to Venice (banking jews). If the church and banking needed constantinoble to control their ports, it wouldnt have fallen to muslims. Entire world is a charada, and events like this are because the powers that rule us, need a way for you to accept that they send you to your death for things like 1-2% reduction in tariffs and tolls. So its framed as crusades.
