[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: images (14).jpg (5 KB, 225x225)
5 KB JPG
According to Science, the first human was found in Ethiopia. Ethiopians are very similar to Somalis, Sudaneses, Egyptians, and Indians. Bantu people, where majority part of African Americans come, have nothing to do with Caucasoid populations. Also, the percentage of difference in the DNA is shown as 99.97%. So, we can say Ethiopians are closer to Europeans than to Bantus.
>>
>>18476629
Cool.
>>
File: Negroids.png (718 KB, 1080x1306)
718 KB PNG
>>18476629
Sudanese have nothing to do with these Neanderthal mutts they are pure East African original Aethiopian cuckAsian OOA conquerors.
>>
>>18476629
> According to Science, the first human was found in Ethiopia.
Older fossils are found in South Africa + MENA. Homo Sapiens was a pan-african development.
> Bantu people, where majority part of African Americans come
They come primarily from Nigeria. I don't think they're even a third Bantu, though I doubt you know what that actually means.
> Ethiopians are very similar to Somalis, Sudaneses, Egyptians, and Indians
This is due to their eurasian admixture, which would not have been present then.

Very dumb post.
>>
File: global pca.jpg (1020 KB, 4000x4000)
1020 KB JPG
>>18476629
classifying blacks as if they are the same species as whites is anti-science
>>
>>18477197
It's really not. "Species" is a very vague term, and one cannot determine speciation via genetic distance alone; this is partly why people can't agree on how many races there are. It's impossible to make certain splits(IE: Germans from Jeets) without causing others which are undesirable and potentially redundant.
>>
>>18477196
Very similar is a huge stretch
>>
>>18477196
yeah sure thing retard, and the original tartarians must have been africans too.
>>
>>18476629
Why do retards like you always assume the people there looked exactly the same tens of thousands of years ago?
>>
>>18477257
Name one thing I said that's wrong. With proof, please.
>>
File: Ancient fossils map.jpg (269 KB, 640x1067)
269 KB JPG
>>18477196
>Homo Sapiens was a pan-african development.
Kek. It's an Indian-Eurofag meme to make Nafris mutts indigenous even the Niger-Congo and Nilo-Saharan niggers like that meme because of their Sahelien Green Sahara wewuzzery and even believe E1b1b is North African. Kek
>>
I’m becoming convinced that while genus Homo might have evolved in east africa, Homo sapiens evolved somewhere in North Africa/the Middle East, and africans are a product of archaic hominids who bred with some Homo sapiens who traveled back down south
>>
>>18477280
This contradicts the extremely modern look of the Khoisan.
>>
File: 3dpca.jpg (82 KB, 668x356)
82 KB JPG
>>18477323
>Khoisan
its the other way around. they are the most divergent from europeans and east asians and belong to the oldest extant haplogroups.
>>
>>18476629
>Ethiopians are very similar to Somalis
maybe because they are the same people?
>Sudaneses
maybe some of them.
>Egyptians
just no
>and Indians.
absolutely not.
>>
File: images (12).jpg (13 KB, 202x250)
13 KB JPG
>>18476629
Their women look like Indians if they were 10000x more attractive
>>
File: images (14).jpg (7 KB, 191x263)
7 KB JPG
>>18477742
Indian or Ethopian call it
>>
>>18477197
>shows a retarded graph that even he doesn't understand
Fuck off back to /pol/
>>
>>18477758
ethiopian
>>
>>18477280
>>18477323
Humans evolved from Bonobos, and travelled counter-clockwise southward from the congo basin along the coast until they reached eastern africa, egypt and eventually north africa. and then, some groups hybridized with chimp-descended hybrids in western africa to become "black" non-khoisan,- pre-bantu "western africans".
khoi-san received constant back-flow from their relatives' previous route that left a trail of compatible hybrids, whereas the pre- and post-bantu western africans had too great a divergence to be properly integrated with khoisan once crossing the congo river became more normal.
tldr;
humans are originally a southern congo basin humanoid, which is why pygmys of the northern basin is so different from khoisan, as they probably are the rainforest "wavefront" of those that travelled internally in he forest as opposed to along the coast/plains.
>>
File: 1706734412997530.jpg (1.85 MB, 1488x5707)
1.85 MB JPG
>>18477761
>doesn't understand
Oh, I do... but do you?
>>
>>18477197
>tikkum olam = colombia
idk, maybe the schizojews got half a point by accident
>>
>>18478779
> showed that it cannot be controlled
LMAO
M
A
O
>>
>>18478790
where's the lie?
>>
>>18476670
>Sudanese
>West Africa
???
>>
>>18478779
> Oh, I do
The image you display is wrong and retarded. Separating humanity into sub-species via the fst threshold you present would produce more than 10 varieties, not to mention that that phylogenetic tree is all kinds of fucked up.
>>
File: image001.jpg (307 KB, 1126x712)
307 KB JPG
>>18478801
Green Sahara sahelian kangz from Senegal to Sudan
>>
>>18476629
a racist's first time reading wikipedia
>>
Ethiopians aren't really black they're essentially mulattos as they are mixed with Arabs across the red sea and back migration through the nile, unless your talking about other the darker skin groups like the ari blacksmiths
>>
>>18478810
>10 varieties
nobody cares about further dividing blacks into ten extra sub-groups of blacks. having them be classified as a different species if enough, thanks
>>
>>18478774
>pokemon evolution
>>
>>18478884
Only 3 of the ten I had in mind were black (Pygmy, Niger-Congo, Khoisan).
>>
>>18478883
Kek. You do know that Ethiopia has 80 ethnic groups and the major ones like the Habesha and Cushites(not Kushites) in fact brag about their Eurasian admixtures and even believe E1b1b is from MENA? They are not like Sahelians niger-congo and nilo-saharan niggers who deny being mutts, the major different between them is the subversive low iq Abrahamic fag Horners would push Ancient Egypt into the Levant/Arabia but they would never do that with their shitty Semite influenced nigger "civilisations" like Aksum whereas the Sahelians might keep AE in Africa.
>>
>>18478918
I suppose you could divide up chinese into two or three groups, and whites should have three.
>>
>>18478884
>n-nobody cares
I accept your concession, retard.
>>
File: 1774764687272354.png (543 KB, 656x646)
543 KB PNG
a certain portuguese on /pol/ gets excited about cro-magnon's long skull. Negroes also have beautiful long dolicephalic skulls. so the Germanic Aryan Norse dolichocephalic appearance has its origins there? Slavs and Balts do not have such skulls
>>
>>18478885
might want to read up on wavefront genetics versus sedentary genetics and how they differ, bro.
>>
>>18478774
> khoi-san received constant back-flow from their relatives' previous route
If this were true, then they wouldn't be more divergent than the other blacks.
>>
File: 350_820_f1.jpg (103 KB, 1280x803)
103 KB JPG
>>18480032
tbf that is why khoisan are so spread out in pcas and not clustered in a corner altho it's mostly admixture with bantus
>>
>>18478779
>Me chad u basedjak heheheheh
>>
>>18478884
So you don't care about actual science and accuracy? Thanks for telling us that you're a faggot.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.