Father Chad Ripperger said that demons choose to speak in the academic-reconstructed pronunciation of Classical Latin instead of the pronunciation of Ecclesiastical Latin if they speak Latin because its holiness. Is there a similar thing with Koiné Greek in the reconstructed Ancient pronunciation as opposed to modern Greek’s pronunciation which is used by the Eastern Orthodox and Byzantine Catholics that Eastern exorcists encounter?Also, is it Hebrew or Aramaic on the Cross? because different Bible translations say different things. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Imh94hTVFWc
>>18477520Jesus spoke Aramaic in everyday life but I assume he also knew Hebrew.and Latin is a steppe-nigger language, lmao.
>>18477520sorry, I stick with church latin. demons can quote Kikero at their leisure.
>>18477520No, sounds like a very anglo type mix of religious schizophrenia and pseudolinguistics, common neither in the Western or Eastern Church.
>>18478004Explain.
>>18479156The linguistics part? Written Vulgar and Classical Latin had learned regional pronunciations until the beginning of the 20th century used by educated clergy and historians and taught to schoolboys, there's nothing especially divine or special about the Italian regional pronunciation. Moreover, ecclesiastical Latin pronunciation has changed over the centuries as the Italian dialects underwent sound changes, it's not some monolith stuck in whatever golden age of blessed articulation (perhaps the Vulgar Latin after the collapse of the Western Empire?) Fr. Retardger imagines it is. When non-Italian popes and cardinals ruled, like the French during the Avignon Papacy, they naturally used the Medieval French pronuciation of Latin they'd learned during their education.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_regional_pronunciationWere the earliest bishops of Rome demon-possessed because they spoke in their native tongue of Classical Latin, or did the time-travelling Holy Ghost teach them a far-future "divine" language so that they could chat with their equally spirit-filled congregation?I've heard rumors of a few Greek wewuzzers who believe Koine Greek was pronounced exactly the same as modern Greek because it's the perfect language of Alexander the Greek who ruled the world like all Greeks should and it cannot undergo sound change, but they do it for secular reasons despite the same type of retardation.The schizo part? Typical prottie anti-intellectualism painting modern classics departments as Satan himself, probably combined with a dash of "trust me bro, an exorcist told me this". Without any interest in looking into the guy, he's probably an American tradcath secrectly taking the Oath Against Modernism of 1910 with one foot into schism, and will join the Palmarians or Polish Old Catholics within a decade after a succession of learned, articulate and theologically conservative popes mindbreaks him for washing poor brown peoples' feet too much.
>is it Hebrew or Aramaic on the CrossYou mean the letters?At that time, the Hebrew Bible was rendered in Aramaic square characters.Had been since Ezra.>>18479436Good job not understanding the basics of what OP is even talking about.Ripperger is saying that these entities chose to speak with him, in particular, according to a particular and purely academic diction because *he* is the one trained according to a different and religious pronunciation.Moreover, even if the pronunciation of ecclesial Latin varies over time, it's still intrinsically connected to the church, part of it's living tradition and the liturgy. So they would naturally prefer speak in a mode that does not have any connection to the church or the mass.>Fr. Retardger>muh brown people, muh modernism How flagrantly and lazily disrespectful, your knee jerk reaction indicates patronizing and insipid egghead arrogance which isn't limited to your opinion on this matter, but probably characterizes your entire life. How insufferable.The only reason you would deliberately mock someone like that, in such a spineless and uninspired way, is if what they had to say made you angry and you had nothing meaningful to retort with. Which would be strange, and would make you look stranger by extension.In short, your uncalled for snide hostility and asinine choice in words outs you as someone who probably needs his services.I'm surprised you don't simply accuse him of fabricating the entire account.I can guarantee that despite your obviously puffed up opinion of yourself, he has studied it more, understands Latin and its development over time better than you.And what's more, you clearly spend more time thinking about "brown people" as being brown than he does. That's embarrassing, you are embarrassing. Fuck off.
>>18480373Demons aren’t real bro
>>18480381I don't care what you think.Just be sure to call him a liar next time.
>>18480373Can we have one Catholic thread without swearing, frater mee in Christum?
