What if Hitler didn't invade Poland, but actually focused on normal development?
What if OP wasn't trans
>>18478825The USSR and U.S would have still economically mogged Germany which would cause Hitler immense clitty leakage which he would take out on an innocent neighboring country
>>18478839Germany mogged the USSR economically in 1980 and that despite being divided for 40 years and losing another 1/3 of its territory to Poland.An uncrippled Germany would have dominated Europe.
>>18478849>muh gdp Yawn
Could've been better if he stayed in Austria and didn't bring out the long knives
>>18478825Fascist Spain times 100
>>18478859Brownoids cope.
MEFO bills
>>18478849>in 1980The power of American tax dollars and military protection.
>>18479071>everything in my country is overpriced and the cost of living is horrendous, take that commie!
>>18478825What if Boudica of the Iceni possessed military prowess in shieldwall tactics, pre-modern guerrilla warfare, and proto Scottish Schiltron-style formations borrow/evolved from classical phalanx, having learned from captured auxiliary commanders, and proclaimed herself Queen in London, utilizing it as a logistical hub instead of sacking the city? This might have enabled her to capture a fleet or construct a navy later, raid prominent Roman bases, and forge secret alliances with the Batavians. She realized Camulodunum and Verulamium would have to be rebuilt into key fortresses for future Roman incursions. Boudica strategically orchestrated political alliances for her two daughters, one through marriage to a northern Celtic tribe or auxiliary commander, and the other with a Germanic leader, potentially from the Angle, Saxon, or Jute.
>>18479084By this logic Haiti would be the Switzerland of the caribbean
>>18478825>>18478825Germany would be 25 years ahead of the rest of Europe (and Russia), technologically and economically, by 1950.They would come to dominate all of Europe with some type of early equivalent to the EU, with no military subjugation necessary. By the 1960s, they'd become a 3rd world power like the US and the Soviet Union (the Soviets wouldn't have anywhere near the power they did with a strong Germany surviving. Very likely most of Central and Nordic Europe would turn into vassal states to the Germans simply from Germany's great technological and economic power. Very likely most of Easter Europe would be strongly allied with Germany as a bulwark against potential Soviet expansion.Franco's Spain would be mostly left alone, though they'd be a trade partner. Mussolini's Italy would be mostly left alone, but Hitler would send in troops to keep Mussolini from being ousted. Switzerland would be left alone as they washed a lot of dirty German money.The government of Germany today would probably still at least be Nazi, at least in name. A power structure that remained untouched for over 100 years. BUT I think in the 1960s-90s, Germany would chill the fuck out a bit and introduce much more freedom, though they would still strongly endorse eugenics and still believe in German supremacy.I doubt the holocaust would have happened, but the Jews would eventually be deported out of all areas of German occupation (the original way they intended to answer "The Jewish Question"). Probably to Madagascar, or maybe even Israel.... but the Germans wouldn't make a point of propping up Israel, they'd just leave them there to build a life on their own. Maybe England or America might help out an early nation comprised of European Jewish exiles.
>>18479084>>18478859Germany mogged the USSR economically in 1938 having surpassed them in production as well.Did commies forget Trotsky wrote an entire book about the wasted potential of the USSR?
Their economy was about to fold, MEFO bills were not a long term solution.
>>18478849>Germany mogged the USSR economicallybecause of trade with the West, which is what hitler would hate
>>18479086SAAAAAAAAAAAAR
>>18478825If they said "let's peacefully co-exist with our neighbors and develop our consumer goods industry instead" then they wouldn't be nazis
So the first problem with this thinking is that from the getgo he pursued a policy of rapid rearmament that was unsustainable long term. So what are we supposed to assume he would just not rearm as much?
