[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Screenshot_344.png (12 KB, 506x273)
12 KB PNG
At the end of the day, is the winner of any war basically determined by supply? Is there any war where the loser lost despite outproducing their enemies? Manpower is included when I say supply.
>>
>>18481189
>Is there any war where the loser lost despite outproducing their enemies?
>>
>>18481195
Shit, you're right, that was right under my nose. Although one could make the argument that America didn't really try.
>>
>>18481189
In a modern conventional war? Maybe arguably, kinda the Korean War, but even then America was far mlre industrialized than China. Outside of the modern era it's much easier to find examples, off the top of my head the Mongol conquests of the Jin and later the Song, Manchu conquest of Ming, Alexander the Great, and any war France lost before like the 18th century.
>>
tommykay >>>/out/



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.