>>18481646
that is because state employs was not in charge but religion heads were the leader of each branch

File: Turkish Revisionism Regar(...).png (19 KB, 1689x131)

19 KB PNG

>>18481646
That's because they weren't, and we know that based on the entirety of modern historiography regarding the Ottoman Empire, and primary sources. The Turkshit who made these graphs is fully aware of that, and therefore, cited two Turkish regime historians who asserted otherwise based on the mere fact that the "Turks" in question were linguistically Turkified Janissary aspirants who were taught OTTOMAN Turkish (instead of the Anatolian Turkish language of the Turkshit masses, who couldn't understand Ottoman Turkish). Besides, the Turkish moderators of Wikipedia REMOVED the ethnicity Tab from the Grand Vizier Wikipedia article because the noted majority of the Grand Viziers were of non-Turkish origin.

File: Turks Rep. Remove the Eth(...).png (58 KB, 1668x392)

58 KB PNG

>>18481926
Here, they outright admitted to removing the ethnicity tab, which refuted this image because facts hurt their based Turkish feelings and shit.

>>18481646
Litteraly just Balkanoid cope and delusion
In reality, Serbina mom's were begging local Turko Ministers to take their son away make something of him beyond a goat herder

File: 1735974958415178.png (11 KB, 512x342)

11 KB PNG

>Chief Treasurers (56): Unidentified.
even then?

>>18481646
Turk is a very complex thing, it can mean more than just ethnic Turks like Islamized Greeks btw

File: Ottoman SE Europe Was Ori(...).png (1.12 MB, 849x895)

1.12 MB PNG

>>18482321
In reality, Ottoman Southeastern Europe was notably more developed and wealthier than Ottoman Anatolia, which is why the Ottoman Empire redirected all of its military, economic, cultural, and demographic policies towards it, and why the vast majority of the Ottoman administration was of South Slavic, Albanian, and Greek origin.

Goatfuckers and villagers resided in Turkish Anatolia, and were the Anatolian Turks, sorry to burst your bubble, shitskin.

>>18483030
I mean, wasn't Ottoman Anatolia less populated and poorer than Byzantine Anatolia pretty much until the empire fell? I remember that a guy here had a graph that showed the population of Anatolia didn't recover to a number comparable to the prime Roman-era until the early 20th century, something about pastoralism limiting population size.

>>18481926
>>18483030
so when are you giving us reparations

>>18483030
>Ottomans are the reason the Balkans are a shithole
>But actually the Ottoman Balkans were the richest part of the Empire
Something doesn't add up.
>t. Canadian white man.

>>18483697
>t. Canadian white man.
doubt
i will explain it to you like you are 5 just because india has a county that is richer than the rest of India it doesn't mean that India isn't a shithole compared to the rest of the world

>>18483703
So the Balkans are a shithole despite being rich and developed because the rest of the Ottoman empire was a shithole? No I think you meant to say that you will explain it to me as if YOU are five.

>>18483030
Balknaoid delusion again.
Maybe some Italian populated coastal parts of the Balkans were rich. But the interior of the balkans has litteraly NEVER been wealthy in comparison to anywhere but maybe Ethiopia. Lmfao the nationalism of the balkanoid vis a vis their pathwtic history is certainly something.

Maybe bulgargolians can claim some prestige, but that mostly comes from the grekoid larper regime being even more pathetic.