He's going to save the good seeds and give them eternal life and burn the bad seeds in "unquenchable fire". He's literally Hitler on steroids.
Why would you judge someone if you know pretty well you can't read minds and your judgement is bound to be wrong every single time?
>>18484489at the very least we can judge in line with how Jesus judged people, and he judged the jews and satanists as evil and his believers as good. Doesn't say anything about those who are undecided of course
CHRISTIANITY IS ARISTOGENETICAL, NOT EUGENETICAL: CHRISTIANITY SELECTS FOR NOBILITY, NOT FOR ADAPTABILITY.A VIRTUOUS PERSON WILL CHOOSE A VIRTUOUS PARTNER IN LIFE; A VICIOUS PERSON WILL CHOOSE A VICIOUS PARTNER IN LIFE; A GIVEN COUPLE'S PROGENY WILL INHERIT THE COUPLE'S CARNAL TRAITS, AND THEIR MORAL ETHOS: A VICIOUS COUPLE WILL BRING INTO THE WORLD VICIOUS PEOPLE; A VIRTUOUS COUPLE WILL BRING INTO THE WORLD VIRTUOUS PERSONS.ACTION SHAPES FLESH; MORALS AFFECT GENES; ETHOS TRUMPS ETHNOS.
>>18484025Every single thing about Jesus' and the apostles' ministries seem to contradict that. Paul, for example, was a decrepit, sickly man. Jesus preached that the meek, the poor, the wretched are to inherit the earth, etc. They all preached to the downtrodden and lacking. >>18484741This retard has the idea.
>>18484753forget weak. I'm talking about eugenics based of the only dimension higher beings seem to care about — morality>>18484741I think we're agreeing
>>18484765Well that's not really eugenics, man. That's completely different. At the level you are treating it, eugenics include nearly every selection process.
>>18484741>A VIRTUOUS PERSON WILL CHOOSE A VIRTUOUS PARTNER IN LIFE; A VICIOUS PERSON WILL CHOOSE A VICIOUS PARTNER IN LIFE; A GIVEN COUPLE'S PROGENY WILL INHERIT THE COUPLE'S CARNAL TRAITS, AND THEIR MORAL ETHOS: A VICIOUS COUPLE WILL BRING INTO THE WORLD VICIOUS PEOPLE; A VIRTUOUS COUPLE WILL BRING INTO THE WORLD VIRTUOUS PERSONS.Then why was the first family that Job picked on his own so shit that god killed them and forced him to take a new family of god's choosing?
>>18484765>I think we're agreeingI DO NOT THINK SO.CHRISTIANITY IS ARISTOGENETICAL,NOT EUGENETICAL.HITLER'S IDEOLOGY WAS EUGENETICAL, NOT ARISTOGENETICAL.
>>18484771Well I thought it was kind of similar. Hitler killed the evil people to end their bloodlines and get them out of the gene pool which is kind of eugenic vs Jesus sending the evil people to hell so they can't infect the rest of reality ever again. But they both punish jews because they've determined that they're the most evil, so Jesus is like super Hitler.
>>18484791>But they both punish jews because they've determined that they're the most evilIt depends which account of judas's death you accept. In one he punished himself via suicide because he wasn't intentionally doing evil, he thought he was helping and didn't like the results, in the the other account he just tripped, maybe the holy ghost tripped him, but it fails to mention that part explicitly.
