[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: font.png (350 KB, 517x520)
350 KB PNG
I really want to know why people that don't have the same phenotype would be 99.9% equal to us. I can agree Scandinavians would be 99.9% equal to Slavs, but 99.9% equal to sub-saharan africans. Something is wrong. It doesn't make sense. Polar and grizzly bears are more equal to each other than africans and europeans and they are 96% equal to each other. I don't believe in this theory I think smarter people would clearly notice "genetics" don't match. And why don't northern Europeans and Eastern Asians have African DNA when they do DNA test?
>>
Why do you retards seethe so much over lip plates? They're not even exclusive to black cultures. Several African countries have explicitly banned them and the only people who still practice it are rural communities in virtual anarchy like Sudan
>>
>>18484531
Because of whom? Who gave those African tribes knowlodge? Why did they stop using those plates?
>>
>>18484531
>They're not even exclusive to black cultures.
I've never seen a white person using this before.
>>
>>18484544
Literal Black and White thinking here.
>>
>>18484531
>Several African countries have explicitly banned them
None did. It only exists in like one area of Ethiopia near the border.
>>
>>18484531
>Why do you retards seethe so much over lip plates?
mocking cooky ghost hominids =/= being mad
>>
>>18484584
The woman on the right is a Nilote. Also there's ghost hominid populations allover the world so not sure why you cling onto the phrase so much.
>>
>>18484601
>Nilote
How is she so black. I thought Somalis were the same color of Indians.
>>
>>18484518
You have a very feeble intellect.

>>18484584
The ghost admixture in Niger-Congoids is almost certainly universal, they just have the most of it (likely ~7% of their genome).

Somewhat unrelated, but I think it's a bit funny how people accused nigs of mixing with and in some cases literally being homo erectus when all scientific evidence only connects Erectus to those with Denisovan admixture (Melanesians, Abbos, Southeast Asians,
etc).
>>
>>18484563
we're talking about black and white people dipshit
>>
>>18484518
How can someone look at this picture and not think racial superiority is a thing?
>>
>>18484518
Humans aren't really that genetically diverse, all humans come from a bottleneck of around a 1000 breeding pairs something like 80,000 years ago, which is nothing in genetic time scales.
What differs between human populations are the rate of expression of genes, which those phenotypes come from, but nearly all of the genes that exist in one population also exist in other populations that are different races, just in a significantly lower expression.
Like, you can have icelanders or irish with chinky eyes even though they have no asian blood, the san also have faces similar to east asians even though they've been seperated for like 80,000 years.
Some people think papuans/negritos/andamanese look like niggers (imo they don't, they have more flatter neotenous faces compared to west/central africans) but obviously they've been seperated from africans for a while.
>>
File: 1628409351450.jpg (41 KB, 640x781)
41 KB JPG
>>18484834
You think comparing an actress and random woman is proof of racial superiority?
>>
>>18484518
the same subspecies btw
>>
>>18484544
>>
File: images (4).jpg (8 KB, 201x251)
8 KB JPG
>>18484518
Being unequal doesn't mean being superior
>>
>>18484844
That bottleneck is so bad in fact that humans have less genetic diversity than any other primate, even the near extinct ones that have tiny isolated populations. Humans (being social higher primates) are simply programmed to investigate our fellow mans facial features in absurdly minute detail, because looking at each others faces is like 90% of how hominids communicate. So our brains make a big deal about features like "He has a somewhat wider nose" that we don't even notice when we look at the faces of other species.
>>
>>18484518
You realize the lip plates aren't part of the dna right? White supremacists are so fucking stupid
>>
>>18484956
desire to insert plates into their lips IS part of their DNA
>>
>>18484987
>high school dropout understanding of genetics
>>
>>18484518
take that lip thing out, unstretch her ear, let her grow her hair out and straighten it and color it blonde, bleach her skin. looks pretty similar
>>
>>18484834
Because they're able to think for 5 seconds. Take some dolled up hollywood negress next to some scrawny methed up trailer trash blonde girl and you have the reverse effect.
>>
File: images (4).jpg (6 KB, 173x280)
6 KB JPG
>>18485007
Nah these retards unironically believe that picrel isn't hot
>>
>>18484995
behavior is heritable as well anon, not just physical traits. Maybe try college understanding of genetics next time?
>>
>>18485046
>>18484987
I am racist and you are retarded. Humans have largely diverged via knobs turning up and down; It is *extremely* unlikely that completely novel behaviors/traits have developed since OOA, and I'm even more inclined to believe this is cultural given that it's done by like, one backwater tribe.
>>
>>18485086
> It is *extremely* unlikely that completely novel behaviors/traits have developed since OOA
why is it unlikely?
Evolutionary selection pressures since humans left Africa have been extensive and mostly local
>>
>>18485046
Bait
>>
>>18485094
Its unironically because there's been too little time, not enough for any sort of ultra-specific propensities to appear among the different groups.

For example: you'd probably be right to say that black people are more spiritual, aggressive, extroverted, and musical (I know the first three have basically been proven), but the keyword there is *more*. To say that black people see the world completely differently (which some have actually argued after noticing some quirks of the Niger-Congo languages) is dumb and almost certainly wrong. The biggest racial difference I can see actually existing would be Ebonics having genetic roots.
>>
>>18484518
the 99.9% number is a stupid muh hecking science factoid that says nothing. Wether a race is similar or different to another is determined by observation.
>>
File: 3oBaIr (1).gif (1.34 MB, 480x436)
1.34 MB GIF
>>18484518
Some nations are not equal to the others
the defeated nation will end up having their lands taken away and colonised
>>
>>18485114
>just go with vibes o algo
This is a 90IQ take
>>
>>18485121
my instinct is more accurate than your nerd numbers
>>
Scandinavians and slavs aren’t the same phenotype
>>
i miss when haploautists had a reasonable grasp of genetics
>>
>>18485135
Estonians are nordic
>>
File: 1755134888755657.jpg (104 KB, 1200x720)
104 KB JPG
This is more brutal
>>
File: 1761003046865867.jpg (173 KB, 1080x1350)
173 KB JPG
Nilotes are possibly one of the ugliest ethnic groups after Abos. They look like a racist caricature.
>>
File: 1760383224659084.jpg (107 KB, 1200x675)
107 KB JPG
The refugee you want to receive vs the one you receive
>>
File: 1755131889118083.jpg (136 KB, 1080x1350)
136 KB JPG
>>
>>18485344
>>18485354
The most rightward women in both of these pics are the cutest present.
>>
>>18484518
Now do a picture of a black model next to a morbidly obese Appalachian sow on a mobility scooter at Walmart!
>>
>>18485007
>>18485872
Average white woman isn't any of these things. I don't think you guys realize when you say that a typical African woman matches the attractiveness of a bottom of the barrel European woman you're making racists' case for them.
>>
>>18485897
>a typical African woman matches the attractiveness of a bottom of the barrel European woman you're making racists' case for them.
Not really. The woman on the right isn't the "typical African". The idea of using cheerypicked pictures as representative of a typical anything is peak stupidity.
>>
>>18485111
>black people are more spiritual, aggressive, extroverted, and musical (I know the first three have basically been proven)
Lmao where do people come up with this shit?

>The biggest racial difference I can see actually existing would be Ebonics having genetic roots.
Which it doesn't
>>
>>18484834
They have been thoroughly programmed by modern institutions to believe "everyone is equal".

This idea has only been around since the 1960s. The thousands of years' worth of evidence to the contrary, and peoples' obvious continued unequalness, easily proves it wrong.
>>
>>18485939
fuck off blankslateist nobody wants you anymore
>>
>>18485872
>thinks this is a persuasive "argument"
The averages of each compared is still white>>>>black.
>>
File: 20260305_231757.png (94 KB, 800x566)
94 KB PNG
>>18485939
> Lmao where do people come up with this shit?

>extraversion
see picrel.

> spirituality
Black people are genetically prone to schizophrenia, which is related to religiosity.

> aggression
Look up MAOA
>>
File: images (90).jpg (34 KB, 447x447)
34 KB JPG
>>18486077
Notice how "the map" appears here.
>>
File: 1760414104304406.jpg (383 KB, 1280x1054)
383 KB JPG
>>18485872
Coloring without contrast + African features makes blacks look ugly.
>>
File: YorubanWoman.jpg (63 KB, 400x624)
63 KB JPG
As an aside, what's so difficult to grasp about human phenotypes changing to adapt to differing climates and UV levels?

>>18484603
Nilotes/Nilotics have nothing to do with Somalis, they're a Nilo-Saharan speaking group known for how tall and dark they are.
>>18484518
>And why don't northern Europeans and Eastern Asians have African DNA when they do DNA test?
Europeans and East Asians are descended from a relatively small offshoot of the general human population and it's been tens of thousands of years since that happened and races as we know them didn't exist back then.
>>18484531
It codes as "foreign"/"primitive" and "African". If the picture on the right was instead a groomed Yoruba/Igbo woman in traditional dress, the visual comparison would lose a lot of its imapct.
>>
>>18484518
There are many black women who are better looking than that fivehead balding german woman on the left
>>
>>18486108
>African features makes blacks look ugly.
What the hell is African features anyways? Half the time I see people denigrating them they either call the features they like "White features" or brown guys projecting onto a population they can safely "punch down" on.
>>
>>18486077
>Look up MAOA
Asians have even more "aggressive" MAOA genes but retards like you don't even understand what they are talking about.

>Black people are genetically prone to schizophrenia, which is related to religiosity.
Not really since no comprehensive testing has been done on Africa as a whole. Nor is religiosity something that has neat correlations.

>>18485976
>>18485986
No one wants the shot you are slipping. You only say that shit in the safety of a dead site because you know you'd get btfo anywhere else. You have nothing to offer so all you do is just fixate on being a total asocial online in the hopes that someone out there tolerates your presence long enough to say they agree with you which is unlikely considering you are posting here lol.
>>
>>18486181
Isn't the one onnthe left Natalie Portman? Isn't she Jewish and Israeli?
>>
>>18486189
No, it's Diane Kruger, german actress. She was also in Inglorious Bastards where she gets strangled to death
>>
>>18484987
some indigenous American natives had lip-plates, they're 100% Eurasian, no SSA ancestry.
>>
>>18484834
>>18485976
>this photo of an actress next to a tribeswoman makes me feel.....LE SUPERIOR
Sub 80 IQ right here
>>
>>18486181
Those black women in question are New World mulattoes
>>
>>18486275
Not even close.
>>
>>18486281
There are no black women with zero Eurasian ancestry who look good without modern cosmetics.
>>
>>18486313
well you are presumably Eurasian and have a Eurasian , particularly a Caucasoid standard of beauty, Through this particular lens, sure.
>>
>>18486313
Any that you'd see would be labeled as mixed or having hidden "Eurasian ancestry". Like kid you do know ancient non-African ancestry isn't rare in Africa right? You'll always downplay any African woman looking pretty because you are fucked in the head. Imagine seeing some East Asian hottest and going
>" you she probably has some distant Dutch ancestry. Yes because of that it's safe for me to call her pretty because she isn't truly pure Japanese."
>>
>>18486108
I dunno man. Black chick there is seriously hot.
>>
File: 1750371926573451.mp4 (3.17 MB, 720x1280)
3.17 MB
3.17 MB MP4
>>18486275
>>18486313
cope

(needless to say now I expect you are going to delusionally say she's ugly because you need to follow your preconceived racist script)



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.