because they were working class and thought women would vote for their parties and women's votes didn't actually change much until the 1960s

>>18485207
It was accurately guessed that most women have no beliefs except those of the men in their life and they figured it was effectively two votes for the guy.

>>18485207
>all old and ugly

>>18485252
5th from left is good looking and 4th could be milfpilled

>>18485207
Because the idea that women were oppressed throughout history is one of the biggest psyops on record.

>British working class men want the vote, stage non-violent demonstrations to draw attention to their cause.
>British government sends in the fucking military, and hangs the survivors as traitors.

>British women want the vote.
>Stage arson attacks on politicians who don't support them enthusiastically enough
>During World War One
>"Oh, yes, of course ma'am, we'll give you the vote basically instantly, while requiring nothing from you in return"

>>18485607
Which non violent British protesters were hanged as traitors?

>>18485207
This was pushed by richfags in order to split wages in half. Richfags don't believe in race or nationalism or morals. All they care about is money.

>>18485211
It was a major shock to the system and led directly to populism, communism and fascism and other irrational, emotional-based political systems actually.

>>18486351
Pretty much this, the most genocidal mass political movements of the 20th century all hedged middle aged women as the core constituency of their support base, and paradoxically empowered these roasties to act as IRL jannies tattling on others. Moderate social democrats in the early 20th century seen this tendency in women in politics to be partisan extremists, whether churchgoing tattlers or unhinged radical socialists, and really dragged their feet on fighting for their voting rights. They seen the women at the time have a hysterical obsession with the temperance movement for some fucked up reason and were getting sick of them trying to deprive them of entertainment after work.

Men would more consistently vote for reasonable fabian methods of advancing worker's rights. And the social democrats were right to be suspicious of women's rights, immediately after women co-opted left leaning social democrat parties everywhere to be massive gibs machine for roastie single mothers and providers of jewish daycare jobs.

The Ba'athist states in the middle east were also very quick to grant women the right to vote and legalized rights for women. They did this because they knew they'd be the ones tattling and screeching if some Arab guy didn't wave enthusiastically enough as the leader's motorcade drove past.

>>18485611
Not enough

>>18486396
thanks, ChatGPT