Why are Jews hated for revolting against a supreme empire (Rome) but Greeks are praised for revolting against a supreme empire (Persia)?
>>18486210Are you forgetting the part where the Greeks spread their wisdom willingly and created a vast intellectual heritage spanning from Spain to India or being intentionally obtuse? The Jews don't want anyone else in their little world, and they hate outsiders. That's the difference. If a Roman or a Cyrenaican or a Chaldean was interested in the writings of Plato, a Greek would feel joy in being able to teach him. On the other hand, if a Roman or a Cyrenaican or a Chaldean was interested in the Torah and wanted to follow it, they'd be taken by sicarii and threatened with murder unless they were circumcised on the spot. That's why. You have a highly intellectual and excellent warrior culture that dominated the entire Near East and then you have a band of Palestinian thugs who stole everything in their holy books from surrounding cultures and used it to murder, lie, and desecrate.
>>18486210Pretty easy, they won. I know that /his/ is full of lefties, but let me break it down: If you lose you look like a bitch.
It is a mystery. Sicarii were noble freedom fighters.
Remember that time a Greek billionaire was also a pedophile who blackmailed hundreds of other pedo politicians and businessmen into doing whatever was most advantageous to the Greek government?
>>18486616Yeah, pederasty totally wasn't a thing in Ancient Greece. Not at all.
>>18486621>Comparing people who lived over two thousand years ago to people living today who still do all those things
>>18486210Who do you think is doing the hating in this case?It's people who claim Rome as an ancestral civilisation. If Persians hate the Greeks then that's up to them.Automatically assuming this universal perspective is gay and retarded. We're not God.
>>18486623The thread is about ancient revolts, retard. I think the actions of ancient Greeks reflects ancient Greeks more than Epstein does ancient Jews.
>>18486670Have you considered that the Jews subsequent actions may have had an effect on their ancient actions?
>>18486672*Had an effect on perceptions of their ancient actions
>>18486672Yes, modern actions have an effect on ancient actions. Because that makes perfect sense, retard. I guess because modern Greece is a useless nation, we should consider ancient Greece useless as well, rather than the foundation of Western civilization?
>>18486676See >>18486675 fuckface.
>>18486676Modern Greece's inadequacy only tells me that their adoption of Christianity aka the idolatrous kike slave religion and their domination by Muslims aka kosher kike slaves destroyed them morally and intellectually.
The jews are the enemy of all mankind. Rome (white civilization) is still mankind’s best hope
>>18486770>The jews are the enemy of all mankind. Rome (white civilization) is still mankind’s best hopeI love it when people see the light.
>>18486210Culturally Romanized peoples are the ones doing the praising and criticism
>>18486210>the Greeks have never done anything of worth in their entire history>they are already under Egyptian rule when the Persians show up and submit without a fight>later on they fly into a rage over some petty bullshit>they massacre/mutilate as many Anatolian civilians as they can get their hands on>when the Persian military shows up they fold like a lawn chair>they repeat this two more times before the Persians finally have enough and scatter them to the winds>their diaspora spends the next two thousand years being an exclusively negative influence on the worldI think the Greeks would be viewed pretty poorly in this case. The jewish revolts have more in common with Boudica, the national embarassment of the Britons, than they do with the Greeks' wars against the Persians. Except even Boudica wasn't as bad as them, there was only one of her, and the Britons were otherwise normal people so it can be chalked up as an atypical chimpout rather than a pattern of behavior.
>>18486770But Persia was full of Ayrans and Alexander the Great (PBUH) knew that the world needed an empire with its hearth land in the Middle East.
>>18486815Why would the actions of Boudica be considered embarrassing, or even that of the Jews? Because it ended in a lot of bloodshed on both sides and because they lost? Why is it simply a 'chimpout' when you fight for the freedom of your people and not a 'chimpout' when you march across Europe and the Mediterranean warring with and subjugating anyone you can lay your hands on?
>>18486902Exactly, what did the Romans ever do for the Jews? Apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the freshwater system, and public health, they did NOTHING!
>>18486902Because their only accomplishments were slaughtering civilians and then suiciding themselves against actual trained soldiers. At least in Boudica's case it was coming fresh off the heels of going from sovereign to subject. And she targeted Roman settlers in Briton. That's quite a step up from a people who were already conquered before the Romans ever met them randomly chimping out and slaughtering other peoples subjugated by Rome in their own cities well outside of judea. There's no way to frame that as "freedom fighters". Killing Greek civilians in Alexandria was not going to free the jews from Roman rule. It was a pointless, omnicidal tantrum. And they did it three times.
>>18486770Judea was the force for a world full of nations thst are independent, proud and driven by strong self-identity and determination. Rome was a force for homogenizing empires.
>>18486210Because the Greeks won while being the underdog while the Jews lost and then seethed about it for 2000 years.If you lose you get no sympathy from history.
>>18486611Thats one fruity centurion
>>18486670What about the Maccabean revolt. Their antics during the revolt put down by Nero and Vespasian was a little disturbing. I do think they are the same after generations on inbreeding.
>>18486611>when principes are approaching but you can only afford peasants
