[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


How accurate is this?
>>
There's 3 big inaccuracies I notice:

1. Sapiens and Neanderthals were trading genes long before OOA (Africans are .5% Neanderthal)
2. Sapiens are actually ancestral to the proper Neanderthals; all Neanderthals were 5% Sapiens. The cultural impact of this was much larger than the genetic impact.
3. Sapiens and Neanderthals did not evolve cleanly from a LCA, and there is no cradle of Homo Sapiens. Evolutionary models indicate that Sapiens derive only 80% of their ancestry from their LCA with Neanderthals, with the remaing 20% being derived from a population that evolved directly from what literally has to be Homo Erectus. These two groups mixed, and the various mixes produced from that later mixed to form Homo Sapiens, with some failing to contribute universally and/or evenly to all populations (which is likely the reason we see "ghost" signals seen throughout Africa; they probably don't come from a truly seperate species). Iwo Eleru is a very likely result of this, as it is very divergent from sub-saharan populations and lies outside of modern human variation.
>>
>>18721692
> Sapiens are actually ancestral to the proper Neanderthals; all Neanderthals were 5% Sapiens.
Or perhaps I should say proto-sapiens; the sapiens-like group which interbred with proto-Neanderthals was only 15% B, whereas all modern humans populations are at least 20% B (Africans likely have an excess of that ancestry, Niger-Congo people especially, they definitely have the most).
>>
File: 1733528752675844.png (80 KB, 1517x1384)
80 KB PNG
>>18721626
wildly heretical, please refer to the attached image for the correct timeline
>>
File: 1789586832606726.webm (1.9 MB, 720x900)
1.9 MB
1.9 MB WEBM
>>18721626
>Proto Caucasian migration back to Africa
Subversive R1b nigger you forgot the CHOSEN people(proto Semites). The world isn't Niggers and Indian-Euros.
>>
>>18721626
The statue of liberty pass is a legitimate play is what I would argue
>>
>>18721753
>Proto semites

You speak an African language
>>
>>18721779
>We wuz cold adapted OG Caucasians
Tell that to the proto Semite yemenis and you speak an Indian language too if you ain't a nigger wewuzzer.
>>
>>18721692
The bigger picture is that human evolution was probably far more reticulate than the simple sapiens-Neanderthal split suggests, with repeated gene flow and archaic populations contributing unevenly to later humans
>>
>Out of Africa theory
It's completely false and irrelevant
/thread



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.