[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: slobo.jpg (199 KB, 940x1529)
199 KB JPG
Why was Serbian ethnonationalism so vehemently supported by progressive leftists.
>>
>>18737498
Varg Vikernes and William Luther Pierce are progressive leftists now?
>>
>>18737498
Tankies are fucking retarded like the far right they will support anything that is anti west
>>
>>18737498
>Why was Serbian ethnonationalism so vehemently supported by progressive leftists.
Because Germans prefer Ustase to Serbian fascism.
>>
>>18737498
Because it was defined by being against Western Civilisation, therefore it was an ally of lefties against their many enemy.
>>18737622
Yes.
>>
>Both far-left campists and right wing Republicans are weirdly supportive of the revanchist crusade of the nationalist government of a declining ex-soviet bloc country
Wait, this sounds familiar...
>>
>>18737651
the far right's opposition is either retarded or runs in contrast to their professed ideology (shouldn't they want "white countries" to rule?) but left-wing opposition to NATO war is natural.
Why should we want the plutocrats who rule us to get even more countries to loot? It means them getting richer at our expense and therefore more able to crush us.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.