File: 1576446393541.jpg (701 KB, 1600x2000)

701 KB JPG

Giantesses in pretty dresses!

File: paris__no_1__by_ponticpri(...).jpg (929 KB, 1920x2868)

929 KB JPG

>>5127677
My kinda thread

File: the_playlist_no_3___golde(...).jpg (1.28 MB, 1920x1889)

1.28 MB JPG

>>5127677
>>5127683

File: 1699777114489724.jpg (1.52 MB, 1806x1200)

1.52 MB JPG

>>5127723

File: 1758119633762322.webm (1.41 MB, 1920x1080)

1.41 MB WEBM

>>5127660

>>5127934
Making this my desktop wallpaper

File: 253281.jpg (1.23 MB, 1399x2410)

1.23 MB JPG

>>5127677
Well dressed is the best

File: annazilla_makes_landfall_(...).jpg (2.57 MB, 3000x1963)

2.57 MB JPG

>>5128149
this one's a classic

>>5127934
What does she say? Does she tease him to suck them?

>>5128608
She says "I got big by myself" and then makes pew pew noises.

So idk what people here think of AI giantess smut art or how 'taboo' it is to mention it (and it's generally crap imo compared to actual collages and blender vids)..but with the new Sora 2 update, could this have potential for some strong giantess stuff?

Seen some Sora 2 giantess vids that were able to get past policy terms and might even improve further in the near future haha

>>5129317
No thanks

>>5129317
Vast majority of what people share of AI is complete shit, because let's face it, if you didn't have the patience to learn drawing/Photoshop/Blender/etc, you aren't going to be spending time refining your two to three sentence prompts. I follow a few Japanese dudes on X that will just put up a video now and then, and they're usually not half-bad (though still weird and uncanny in parts). But the overall deluge of 50 pictures of the same prompt with minimal changes, and being super gay about demanding to be called an "artist," absolutely does not make me want to respect the people using AI.

Just my two cents.

>>5129479
Frankly, this was already an issue without AI as well. So many artists just churn out endless streams of low effort slop. The prospect of how much worse this is getting with the addition of people who - to anon's point - don't even have to *kinda* learn to draw / collage / model is ominous as fuck.
The time isn't far before it's actually impossible to sift through the endless piles of sizefetish trash to find anything even of middling quality.
It's enough for the gooners and the autists so it'll just get churned out with ever increasing frequency.

>>5129485
We already lose plenty of talented people due to sheer apathy. >>5129117 was made by a guy that started getting traction on X, asked for the bare minimum of feedback (comments on his work and some input from the people hitting "like"), didn't get that, and peaced out again. Super frustrating. I can only imagine less people will be interested in making stuff and putting it out for free if they see a bunch of slop diluting the market, as it were.

>>5129497
GOAT collage for sure

File: s6df54g.jpg (4.61 MB, 2600x2600)

4.61 MB JPG

>>5129485
>>5129500
For better or worse, I find myself wondering how much longer collaging will exist as a common practice. I used to make collages often, but as the years go on more and more of the time I would spend on it gets eaten up by other hobbies and responsibilities. And while AI slop definitely isn't there yet, I wonder how much time I spend on pics is justified when AI can generate something (almost) passable in a matter of minutes or even seconds.

Ultimately I think it is all the more reason for people to just make what they want. That's why I learned, I wanted to make pics of models I wanted to see and got tired of waiting for someone else to make them. The community aspect of it all has always been a bit lopsided imo, putting hours of effort into something isn't rewarding if you value it in terms of the likes and comments you'll get. I used to get frustrated when pics I worked really hard on would get overshadowed by other pics I spent half the time on, just because of something like the model I had in the pic. And AI is making it all worse for sure, but even then I feel like algorithms and the the direction of the internet as a whole has been degrading the quality of the community experience anyway. I wouldn't even know where to look for new collages aside from here and artist pages on twitter.

So while I don't like these "AI artist" pages, if people are able to make the content they want to see then good for them. I myself have messed around with SD a bit and had fun seeing what I could generate. I just wish they would keep it to themselves: both in terms of not flooding galleries with actual content, but also at least using local AI models and not contributing to the server farms that are wasting resources and supporting a toxic industry.

File: cs53 - kirbs - 1.jpg (2.51 MB, 3600x2065)

2.51 MB JPG

>>5129697
>>5129500
Curious who this was? Don't recognize the image from anyone, but the composition is very interesting.

Real shame they left, in any case. Like >>5129697 touches on though, doing this for the likes and engagement (maybe?) never was enough, especially if what you want to make falls outside stale pics of the hottest new celeb. Community feedback can definitely be a healthy component of motivation, but large parts of it has to be something internal. It's difficult to justify the time we spend otherwise. I could maybe see that with the Internet flooded with slop, people might engage with genuine expression more? I doubt it though. Most folk will just get numb to it all, have a Jork and leave. I wish they'd do that without flooding the web with samey, stale pictures, but alas.

Semi-related, I've done lots of paid work lately to make rent---not all size, but a decent amount of it is. I'm satisfied with very little of it. Even the many edits which are "objectively" fine don't vibe with me. And with the amount of images that haven't turned out great despite my best efforts because I was dealt a bad or mediocre hand... Hard not to feel I'm just making slop.

Ultimately my own personal satisfaction doesn't matter, only if the one paying likes it, and if they do that's absolutely rewarding, and my tastes my be different, sure, but man can it be soul-sucking. Feels like I'm stagnant. I don't have the time to experiment or learn new things because I'm on the clock. I'm withheld from peaking higher because I can't choose to spend forever on a edit where I carefully chose the material. Getting better was core of what motivated me, and it's been harder lately.

>>5129500
... was made by a guy that started getting traction on X
>>5129697
>I wouldn't even know where to look for new collages aside from here and artist pages on twitter

I've not been on there for a long time aside from whenever someone throws me a link. Any good new folks I've missed out on?

>>5129775
https://x.com/CollagesByN
Last post was in March.

I agree that you need to do it for yourself but I understand wanting some degree of engagement, if you're going to bother disseminating it online. Then there are some people ( https://x.com/R3kacutioner ) who you can tell are just trying to farm likes - not hone a skill - by making dogshit collages of women with large followings who they know will retweet them. It honestly pains me to see someone with no grasp of perspective, lighting, etc. get 1K likes on something like that.

I've tried doing some commissions in the past but had a similar experience to you, it feels soulless and almost inevitably I don't find the model I'm given attractive. Also there's a lot of back-and-forth because the people commissioning a collage give me low-resolution pics with bad lighting or other conditions that are hard to make work. But at the end of the day, even if I wasn't satisfied with the finished product, as long as they liked it, I guess it has some worth - like you said.

I'd like to keep improving, as with many other things I've tried I hit a plateau and progress becomes imperceptibly incremental. I can see improvement from my old stuff, which is good, but I think eventually I'll just feel more and more stagnant and hang it up for good.

>>5129697
Also anon this collage is really stellar and I've never seen it before, do you have an archive online somewhere? I'm really impressed by how you nailed the lighting on her, night pics are really hard.

File: GjpijVlXEAAkpYX.jpg (162 KB, 1023x1535)

162 KB JPG

>>5129843
These were pretty good, I'd've been happy to have be able to call them my own. Shame they dipped

>I'd like to keep improving, as with many other things I've tried I hit a plateau and progress becomes imperceptibly incremental. I can see improvement from my old stuff, which is good, but I think eventually I'll just feel more and more stagnant and hang it up for good.

I hope making an edit is satisfying or a good way to chill at least. Personally I gotta recognize that I'm not going to see huge gains anymore and I need to come to terms with it. Collaging as a medium is something I can just do once in a while I guess.

If you're up to it, you could try learning a new medium. Not necessarily for size stuff, but it could be. I've spent effort learning to paint. It's been nice to properly suck again

>>5129844
I wanna know too

Some interesting responses in this thread regarding collages/AI..

So what would be the future of giantess content? Any way it'll evolve?

Live-action videos have mostly stagnated and are all mostly the same. Ex. Gary Pranzo vids haven't been anything special in a long time and feel they've actually regressed in quality. Partly due to rampant pirating desu.

Also, gets a little tiring using the same models over and over again for the past 10 years or so, but I understand that its due to them being local. Would've killed to see a mega vid with Irene Silver, Stelle Elle, etc when they were around, but no one commissioned a custom I guess plus Gary hasn't bothered updating his customs site forever (or responds at all).

Still some decent collages, but feel there's limitations there and once again. Unless the girl or scenario is a bit different, it's kinda peaked in quality years ago.

Sadly, I feel that the best content right now is CGI/Blender content since you can play around with almost unlimited possibilities. Analternateusername, Palika, Heavenly, GTSGuyEnjoyer, to name a few.

Too bad I'm computer-retarded since I would love to make my own Blender (I'm assuming the best for this type of stuff) material.

Maybe just be patient, use tutorials constantly, and start out basic-bitch simple stuff I can get there eventually haha

File: G2OOhXKXUAASPOX.jpg (1.26 MB, 2214x1580)

1.26 MB JPG

>>5129857
>If you're up to it, you could try learning a new medium. Not necessarily for size stuff, but it could be. I've spent effort learning to paint. It's been nice to properly suck again
That's true, drawing or painting is something I've wanted to try for a long time. I used to be demotivated by the internet because you can instantly see people who are at the top of their game, and sometimes it's hard to push past your own feelings of mediocrity when looking at that stuff. The glut of AI has actually helped me a lot with this because now I enjoy humanmade work more, even if it's nothing particularly amazing. I like writing and recording songs even though I'm not a particularly skilled songwriter, and I just have that innate enjoyment of it that I wish I had more of for collaging.

>>5129892
>Maybe just be patient, use tutorials constantly, and start out basic-bitch simple stuff I can get there eventually haha
Exactly, you gotta start somewhere. I even enjoy seeing people chronicle their progress on these kinds of things on X.

>>5129317
>Seen some Sora 2 giantess vids that were able to get past policy terms
Do you mind sharing these? Very curious to see what they look like

Here.

>>5130481
Something hot about the idea of a cruel giantess tricking/forcing a gentle giantess in causing destruction and killing.

File: 158765.jpg (2.52 MB, 2816x2112)

2.52 MB JPG

>>5130540
There sure fuckin' is

File: d5fg64h564gh.jpg (1.34 MB, 1440x2560)

1.34 MB JPG

>>5129775
>>5129843
I can relate with a lot of this. It can be fun working on a request at times when you feel the same spark as personal work, taking a source pic and creating a whole new context for it. But most of the time it feels like a slog. And even when you think you have a pic you can work with you can't find a setting where it really clicks. I also have some complex where actually being requested to do something grinds my creative drive to a halt. I have to trick myself into "goofing off" on side project after side project to get anything done.

>>5129844
>>5129857
Thanks, I really just lucked out with the position of buildings and signs. And no, these days I just post pics on here.

>>5130668
Gorgeous pics anon, appreciate you sharing

File: og651hgh.jpg (1.64 MB, 1770x2650)

1.64 MB JPG

(had to break this post up since something triggered the spam filter)

>>5129857
>>5129919
Learning new mediums is great, you'll be surprised with what past skills you have can transfer over, and how new perspectives will recontextualize those skills. Like how learning to add color to shadows in collages will teach you a little color theory in general, you start seeing it in paintings and everyday life. For me, I generally find size stuff being a good motivating excuse to learn something new. Recently I've gotten the addiction of getting figurines and placing them on dioramas by my desk. It makes me want to learn how to make my own through 3D printing, which makes me want to learn more stuff in Blender, and how to paint figurines, and all the other skills necessary for that hobby. I don't have the means of getting a printer currently, but it's enough to make me look into ordering kits and learning how to paint them. And these are all skills I need to learn anyway for non-size projects I want to do, so even I'm acting on my baser impulses it's going towards something productive in the long run.

>>5130669
Thanks, glad you like them

File: c13 - n 3 - 1 lr.jpg (1.33 MB, 2000x2883)

1.33 MB JPG

>>5130672
I see the videos of folk working in detailed little dioramas and while the idea is very appealing, I could never. Not having ctrl+z is terrifying

3D printing is fun though. I'd guess it's a lot cheaper to get into now than it was when I did, too

>>5130668
I gotta do more (of my own volition) at this size. Someday.

>>5130668
>And even when you think you have a pic you can work with you can't find a setting where it really clicks.
This is my biggest problem. For all the projects I "start", it feels like most die after failing to find a good background image to place them into. It really kills the motivation when you hit a bad streak and fail to find a good project to push beyond the initial stages for days at a time.

File: quirky_qualley_s_quaint__(...).jpg (935 KB, 1920x2104)

935 KB JPG

>>5130668
Strong work here!

>>5130672
Well said. I wonder how many people got good at stuff like Photoshop, Blender, etc only cuz they wanted to create their own giantess content haha

Dumb question cuz I know barely anything about this tech: what would be the average time it takes to make a single giantess collage? I know it'll vary person to person, skill level, etc.

Just with all this talk about putting in the amount of work to either make something well made or something that's didn't hit expectations or debate whether or not it was 'worth it' in the end.

I'm assuming even Blender animations that are around 30 seconds to a minute probably takes weeks alone.

File: 2f6f3ec45360db53f51554af6(...).jpg (567 KB, 1350x2400)

567 KB JPG

>>5130697
Yea 3D printers are affordable enough these days, I just don't have a good spot to set one. I've got too many people and animals running about to leave it undisturbed. And that's not talking about resin printers that need ventilation, which is probably the one better suited for the intricate stuff I'd want to make. As for dioramas I just have an architectural kit I got off eBay. I'd like to add more buildings and such, but again it's more a matter of free space.

>I gotta do more (of my own volition) at this size. Someday.
IMO I find that range to be easier to work with. Smaller scales are harder since you can't use destruction effects to do your blending, they really have to match their environment perfectly. Giga seems easier on paper, but for me getting the atmospheric and worldbuilding effects right to sell it are really difficult, I have a lot of respect for those that can make it work.

>>5130700
Yea I often will have 4 or 5 different projects saved of the same model in different backgrounds, with none of them really looking right. It's especially frustrating when the pic is oozing with size potential, but the lighting or angle is, like, 5 degrees off from any BGs that might work. That's another frustration with requests too desu, people really don't know how hard it is to make low angle pics like >>5130543

>>5130851
Thanks! And like you said it depends, but really simple ideas with easy cutouts can be done as quickly as 30min to an hour. It usually takes longer though with more details. It's hard to quantify after a certain point, since a lot of time I spend looking through backgrounds or trying to figure what details I want to add. I could probably be more efficient by learning new techniques, but I'd say it takes a couple hours give or take. Personally I think it takes much longer if you end up working on it in multiple sessions. I remember Alt saying he did all his collages in a single sitting, which is crazy considering how good his work is.

>>5130700
Many such cases. I wish more people knew how time intensive finding images that come together to make a half decent composition is.
>>5130697
I love that kinda fashion on a giantess

File: c7 - noseeum 2 - 1 lr.jpg (3.78 MB, 4251x3200)

3.78 MB JPG

>>5130959
There was more.

>>5130851
Shortest I remember for a solid, competent edit was 30 minutes. Plus another 30 minutes of fiddling with sliders. I recorded that one, actually. Was only so quick because the images matched perfectly

The one with Qualley there was maybe 4-5 hours? There'd a lot of invisible work no one ever sees. I tested her out with a number of different backgrounds. These things would take longer but I've built a large searchable atabase of background pictures and yeah, unless they're massive edits I tackle them in one sitting as well while I spend 6 hours listening to music or a guy talk about a Lincoln highway

File: nse1.jpg (3 MB, 1410x2045)

3 MB JPG

>>5130540
>>5130584

Good/Bad giantess duo is the best trope

>>5129317
Sora2 stuff was genuinely impressive and interesting at first glance but Sizetwitter is being flooded with absolutely milquetoast content from it. This is far from the worst but I saw an exchange on Twitter where this guy was citing "protecting his workflow" as a reason for not sharing his prompts, which is laughable, so I'll just cite this one as an example: https://x.com/TheTinyDude1/status/1975581063419199943

The awkward pacing and that on-brand insane way of eating that only AI could dream up are both great reasons not to post this. At the very least it needs some video editing. I've never seen an artist or collager refuse to offer tips and tricks to aspiring newcomers but the way a lot of AIheads jealously guard their prompts really shows their insecurity.

>>5132360
love racmoms body but wish she didn't have dumb millenial scribble tats and metal sticking out her face, women just love nuking their looks for no reason

>>5132394
The cringe makes it hotter, anon.

File: RDT_20251008_190707314176(...).jpg (316 KB, 1016x1280)

316 KB JPG

>>5132436
Me when I finally shrink but it's around quirk chungus polycule redditor white woman and not giga stacy. Still better than nothing ig

>>5132475
Passed around the polycule? Sounds neat.

File: GzTZySNa4AMNmTV.jpg (1.98 MB, 1632x2281)

1.98 MB JPG

>>5132394
It is a fucking ridiculous body to be fair

File: 17.png (4.59 MB, 1195x1712)

4.59 MB PNG

>>5132477
the polycule fantasy is just that, a fantasy because no hot women actually do it. Enjoy your fat 4 disabled fat guys and she-hambeast, tiny

>>5132509
she's hot and it's the worst part like. bumper stickers on ferrari mentality. you could be doing nordic pagan fertility goddess larp or something but insist on the trailer park aesthetic hitting you in 10 years. Idk if she lost the hardware she would make my penis the bigger penis

writing all this out I realize how much hate I harbor in my heart. complimentary big pawgs for my rambling

>>5132526
Big PAWGS and introspection. Nice post anon.

>>5132394
>love racmoms body but wish she didn't have dumb millenial scribble tats and metal sticking out her face

Tatted & pierced leftist alt-thot giantess > conventional & respectable trad-con giantess

File: 1622895382557.jpg (689 KB, 1080x1620)

689 KB JPG

>>5132526

This type of girl is my fav

Requesting a pair of african-american giantesses , about twenty feet tall, walking around the streets of New York City in the 1950s.

Thank you.

File: 1523370121517.jpg (736 KB, 1778x1000)

736 KB JPG

>>5133175
An ideology where women must be submissive to their men and obey their every command mixes with a femdom-adjacent fetish like macrophilia like water and gasoline. The leftist "grrl power smash the patriarchy" attitude fits it much better.

>>5134054
Conservative E-Girls aren't very submissive or conservative though. They're generally just kinda smug beyond their measure and rabidly attention whore just like progressive E-girls, only they pander to those who don't find leftists appealing.
In the end, any e-celeb is going to necessarily be big for her britches, boisterous, attention seeking, at least somewhat narcissistic, and probably controlling. All of these are great traits to have in a giantess.

>>5134206
>>5134054
if a women could somehow combine this personality with eroticism she's be a unicorn. too bad they can't, universally. dominant women don't exist. these traits are just female personality disorders they express to the world in the most possibly unsexy manner.

>>5134291
that is what we call a "lucky bastard"

File: F5DoxAeWIAAkzxa.jpg (651 KB, 1488x1488)

651 KB JPG

>>5134560
No matter how many times they're posted, I can never get enough of these. God I wish that was me so bad. It's my dream to be tiny and helpless as I'm firmly pressed between a woman's plush lips.
>>5134561
I also love this one. I need more collages in this vein.

>>5135233
Fun fact, I was literally inspired to make >>5134561 by >>5134560.
Nothing like a pair of lips each the size of a bus to activate the old almonds

Have a normal fetish, you freaks.

>>5135722
yeessss goon to nihger cuckold anal rape pornography like the rest of us normal goy!!!

actually kys retard

>>5134387
>he thinks girls with personality disorders wouldn't make extremely hot giantesses

File: lena_meyer_landrut___detr(...).jpg (1.8 MB, 2000x3000)

1.8 MB JPG

>>5132306
>the way a lot of AIheads jealously guard their prompts really shows their insecurity.

deep down they know it's not art, they know it looks like shit from an ass and they know they will never gain the respect they covet from their "Fellow" size artists or in other words. YWNBARA (you will never be a real artist)

File: please_by_ponticprince_diqa0vp.jpg (730 KB, 1920x1059)

730 KB JPG

>>5135964
>giantesses with mood swings, my beloved

File: 8b24eb_48a006416cc24f3a80(...).jpg (722 KB, 1185x1678)

722 KB JPG

I've said it previously but i love the Nu ads because they're like "ls your life boring? try getting a new haircut and rampaging through your city as a giantess!"

>>5130481
Imagine she takes off the blindfold and realizes the she's destroyed the place she gets her nails done or that she's stepped on the neighbor who watches her dog for her when she works late. And her friend can't contain her laughter after that.

>>5136310
I remember the commercial. I still jerk off to it every now and then.

>>5129317
As someone who enjoys fairly vanilla size stuff in ads (buddylee etc) I'm surprised by SORA2 and somewhat optimistic in that use case (I don't care much for AI in illustrations). As I'd say it's already reached a level of "realism" for character models/camera effects comperable to those mentioned ads (granted on occasion a few glitches with misplaced fingers but very rare compared to years ago in photos). The obvious shortfalls being consistency (important benchmark in this fetish) and movement.

Though currently due to usage sometimes you get a bad batch of videos ("glossy" look and physics glitches). Obvious tip is to under no circumstances use the word "giantess" instead specifying "100 meters/300ft tall woman" and no rampage stuff. If you get a good batch you can get a video of that gts size of her grabbing a car and it being consistent to size (backgrounds themselves need improvement), I've even gotten vids of her smashing car without prompting it (obviously not detailed). Audio is slightly desynced and the voice quality and voice lines are very good (even trying different languages/dialects is great). There are issues when you have multiple characters speaking (IE, a tiny using female voice and the gts having male voice) so it's best to restrict dialog to gts only. I dno how shrink stuff is like.

Google's veo3.1 was released yesterday and it was rumored to be 30 second video limit but that ended up being untrue and the quality itself (imo) is awful with audio worse than SORA and that usual glossy "ai look" and consistency is bad. Despite this SORA now upgraded to 15/25sec vid limit from prior 8/15 sec

>>5136113
Giantesses with mood swings who have to be endlessly coddled and supported by the tinies living in fear of her; giantesses with narcissism who are given all the power and attention they think they deserve, letting them believe they're unimpeachably right about everything because everyone is too afraid of disagreeing with her; sociopathic giantesses that get to indulge every pleasurable impulse they want, no matter how cruel or depraved, without any fear of punishment; giantesses who lack theory of mind or are too childishly self-absorbed to consider the immense impact of their actions on the human beings around them who now must orient themselves completely around her.

Giantesses made from girls who, in their normal lives, were marginalized and worked around because they were just too difficult for people to deal with, but are now The Most Important Beings On Earth. Her neuroses are now of world historical importance, dictating the course of countless lives. That's the good shit.

File: the_playlist_no__1___wick(...).jpg (1.67 MB, 1920x2654)

1.67 MB JPG

>>5136895
>Giantesses made from girls who, in their normal lives, were marginalized and worked around because they were just too difficult for people to deal with, but are now The Most Important Beings On Earth
>Her neuroses are now of world historical importance, dictating the course of countless lives.
>That's the good shit.
This nigga gets it.
>Bipolar giantess who fluctuates between manic episodes where she will redecorate the whole town according to the latest trend and being so depressed she just lays around in everyone's way for weeks
>OCD Giantess who micromanages the ever loving shit out of the city and everyone in it
>ADHD Giantess who can't take care of anything herself and is extremely dangerous because she doesn't pay attention for more than two seconds
And then there's the whole gamut of 'difficult / annoying at normal size' who become absolute terrors as giants;
>New Age Vibes girl who as a giant forces everyone to adhere to her retarded horoscopes and salt crystals nonsense
>Activist girl who subject her tinies to a stone age lifestyle to fight climate change
>Blabbermouth girl whose non-stop talking is now the most deafeningly loud thing in the metro area
>Girl whose entire personality is 'dude weed' or 'rosé all day' whose addiction now needs to be coddled by everyone and comes at their expense
>Woman who no one ever held accountable for being a violent bully because she was petite but now is a living nightmare
And, most simply and perhaps underratedly
>The woman who means well but is just DUMB as a sack of bricks
My favorite flavor of all these is where society starts sort of devolving to match her bad traits either just to cope or because people naturally (even subconsciously) mimic her because she's so powerful.

File: 13.png (2.93 MB, 1080x1377)

2.93 MB PNG

>>5136965
give me dumb girl any day, especially if she's top heavy. Massive tits for a huge ditz

>>5136965
What a fucking good picture right you have right there. She wants them to enter her bellybutton?

>>5136965
Giantesses who mean well and want to be peaceful but are clumsy and/or dumb, or simply cannot avoid collateral damage due to their size are the best

File: MelNYC2.jpg (1.05 MB, 2000x1333)

1.05 MB JPG

I know we're generally not lovers of generative AI in place of collages, but how do we feel about experimenting with image-to-video stuff? A friend suggested Grok's video generation, and while it fails 9 times in 10 for giantess stuff, it sometimes produces something nice. Pic/link related. Thoughts?

https://files.catbox.moe/tu1bbw.mp4

>>5137569
I've had fun throwing some of my collages into Kling or whatever. A lot of times the result isn't worth sharing but I've had a few gems. I know it's just personal cope but I don't feel as bad about it if (seemingly) the dataset the AI was using to turn my photos into videos was shitloads of random YouTube videos. I'm not down with AI that mimics art or illustrations but for making a photograph move I don't mind. I know a lot of people have a hardline stance against any kind of AI, which I get, so I don't share any of it on my accounts across different platforms, but I've gotten a few good videos out of some collages I made.

Kind of the same thing with what >>5136596 is talking about - I've had success with Sora2 make 90s-esque giantess commercials, which are my jam since I grew up with that stuff. It's about the only thing I would ever use pure text-to-video AI for, as I don't have the means to make it otherwise. It is fun when people manage to dig up actual size commercials from the time period that nobody has known about until now thanks to those accounts on YouTube that digitize and upload random VHS recordings of old TV broadcasts, but it's not an infinite well, and it takes a lot of sifting through hours and hours of random commercials.

>>5137569
Are there any AI generators out there that don't require you to buy credits or whatever to generate stuff? I'm not going to pay money to create AI slop.

>>5137810
Getting Sora2 code is best hope for now as it's currently free. Other alternative is to pay $50 for a wrapper like higgsfield which allows unlimited S2 generations even after credits run out (2 concurrent renders at once, which takes around 20 min to load) but that unlimited S2 ends tomorrow. In span of 5 days was able to generate little over 100 vids.

>>5137776
I'd say for a batch of 20 vids it's something like this

3 trash: GTS model has oversized proportions, "rubber-banding"/low effort "greenscreen" superimposed look (similar to tiktok), "body-split" glitches (two gts of the same model one smaller gts with only her legs etc), GTS herself looking like video game model, Bethesda-tier dialog

4 bad: no errors with GTS but poorly detailed backgrounds with poor consistency, no collision effects, same "greenscreen" look, bad movements (backwards walking, schizoid animation transitions)

6 basic: all good with GTS but needs work with movements, same bad BG or good BG but no collision/interaction effects

3 decent: no trash errors, few bad errors, more consistency with size but still not good (a car grabbed may be perfect size at one scene only to change later etc). Rarely a good clip but not the full vid

3 good: camera effects are consistent through entire video and GTS size is somewhat consistent but minor BG inconsistencies. On occasion you get a short great clip with consistent size and even good object/BG interactions.

1 great: still minor stuff but for 1 year impressive for AI vid process only issue is short runtime and hoping you get another in next batch roll

In my experience it's best to start with a scene with fully-body view of the gts where her size is established. Trying to create vids where she's revealed (IE window peeking and next scene top-eye view of her next to building) just makes inconsistency. As soon as S2 stops being free i'm going to try S2pro (25 seconds) for single month until next major Sora update is out as i'm optimistic.

>>5135722
>You like hot girls.
>You don't like it when hot girls are gigantic, meaning there is more hot girl for you to enjoy.
Where's the logic?

>>5137950
That poster is obviously a shitter and not worth engaging, but since a lot of us seem to struggle with the "why" here, here's the deal in a nutshell:
>Fetishes used to be entirely reviled as recently as the 50s, except for cryptofetishes like 'short women' or 'tall, dark, and handsome'.
>Now normalized, fetishes have kinda been carved into 'normal' and 'freakshit'
>'Normal' fetishes are centered around sex (esp PIV) no matter how otherwise bizarre (choking, 90% of the tags on the Hub, anal)
>'Freak' fetishes are anything that isn't easily, exclusively, and obviously linked to sex (Macro/Size, BDSM, baloons, furries, cartoons, sissification, ASMR, feet, etc etc)
The average person will generally ascribe any fetish 'normalcy' or 'weirdness' based on that criteria.

>>5137886
>>5137941
love it when girls show off the bare skin hiding their boy processing organ

File: casually_callous_colossal(...).jpg (287 KB, 1743x1000)

287 KB JPG

>>5137776
Yeah, I haven't really been too impressed ewith the still image to video/animation stuff thus far. Kinda boring and can't really do a whole lot even with strong prompts I feel. At least what I've seen so far.

And going back to the whole 'giantess AI' art..others have said it in this thread but I agree the worst part about the whole thing is that most of these 'AI giantess content creators' can get really annoying with not sharing their prompts and claiming to be 'artists' when they aren't.

I'll admit I've experimented with Sora 2 and it is loads better and surprisingly capable of making some decent giantess content. Surprising in a sense that it has gotten past some policy terms. I know there was that announcement by ChatGPT saying they will loosen some restrictions for GPT (which is connected to Sora) in December to allow more 'eroticsm' and mature content so maybe they'll be further improvement then idk

>>5138721
>And going back to the whole 'giantess AI' art..others have said it in this thread but I agree the worst part about the whole thing is that most of these 'AI giantess content creators' can get really annoying with not sharing their prompts and claiming to be 'artists' when they aren't.

There was just a thing on X recently where an AI "artist" got mad at someone else for "stealing" their prompt, which was literally just "day-to-night transition" (so not even a thing they invented, nor much of a secret). They wrote a huge post about it - the delusion was amazing. It's another example of them replying to concerns about copyright infringement with "haha fuck you" but then getting super butthurt when they perceive their "work" has been stolen.

>>5138745
That Shadiversity retard was the first time I saw it. Literally the joke about the pigeon stomping about the chessboard and shitting on it thinking it won.

Could some anon do a reverse king kong?
In other words a giant naked woman climbing the Empire State Building with biplanes buzzing around maybe with a man or gorilla in one hand?

File: bafkreibteg4k5zwjexjnirec(...).jpg (934 KB, 2000x2000)

934 KB JPG

>>5139077

>>5139077

https://youtu.be/vxfd31c51-4?si=6cAE-RjNAk7FzJhr

>>5136965
>My favorite flavor of all these is where society starts sort of devolving to match her bad traits either just to cope or because people naturally (even subconsciously) mimic her because she's so powerful.
I'm not sure if I've ever considered something like this. I do love when the process of adapting to life under the giantess involves the cognitive dissonance of accepting the arbitrary rules and horrors imposed on everyone while knowing in your heart that this is an inescapable nightmare, and the existential despair from the hopelessness of it. But I can't immediately think of examples/stories of people taking on her traits.

>>5138024
>>'Normal' fetishes are centered around sex (esp PIV) no matter how otherwise bizarre (choking, 90% of the tags on the Hub, anal)
Are those really considered “normal?” I feel like anything that isn't literally just vanilla sex is considered weird.

Also, does anyone sometimes think this fetish is incredibly cringe, but when you step away from it for a bit and then come back, it becomes really hot again?

>>5139801
These are irrefutably 'normie' to anyone but the most prudish these days:
>Choking (Women)
>Anal (Men)
>Costumes / Roleplay (schoolgirl, nurse, daddy, etc)
That doesn't guarantee that a partner won't find it repulsive anyway, but it's seen as a compatibility issue not the fetishist being a freak.
By contrast macrophilia is foot-fetish tier, which is to say amusing at best and shunnable at worst.

>>5127660
Imagine her taking a huge dump into the Guggenheim Museum or the Madison Square Garden... that would be... f-funny... ha-ha!

File: Gulliveriana_ Milo Manara.jpg (531 KB, 1080x1396)

531 KB JPG

Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but every time I see this pics I can't avoid thinking about their bodily functions...
>>5135768
>>5135770
>>5136090
I mean, in these ones they're pulling their pants, it looks like they're readi to squat and let it go
>>5136113
And here Gio looks like she's taking an urgent piss and/or shit behind that building... just look at her desperate face ffs

>>5139999
>>5139994
after digesting a lot a people a giantess will have to poop somewhere, that's just biology anon

>>5141227
Need more pornstar giantesses.

File: 984673.jpg (6.62 MB, 3777x2498)

6.62 MB JPG

>>5141228
Sure

I would love to see Jewelz Blu go on a destructive vore filled rampage.