Well? Which one is king?
CSP for line drawing, Photoshop for painting, Krita if you're poor.
>>7752225Firealpaca
>>7752225if you don't have money, choose Krita
green is my pepper
>>7752225beg problem
>>7752234Painting in photoshop sucks
>>7752263It still provides the best results
Krita is free so, Krita
>>7752225Painting in Krita sucks
>>7752225Photoshop is more complete, Krita has a terrible system for editing letters, csp it is saturated with garbage brushes that are useless.
>>7752300>Photoshop is more completephotshop literally steals your data and owns anything you have done in their software
>>7752325Everyone uses Photoshop CS6 from 2012.
>>7752325NTA, I use the pirated version, I don't give a damn about Adobe.
>>7752225get a pirated version of Photoshop CS 24.0 or some old version like CS 20.0 are still a better option, CSP is full of unnecessary shit, meaningless brushes and a lot of multimedia shit that you are never going to use like labels and mannequins and 3D objects, it is inflated with shit filler, although it is true that you don't need to download it, generally people get tempted and full Its software is garbage, it's also slow, Krita is for people who want something light and fast, for drawing and painting it's very good for basic art, but you can't edit your works precisely, you can't add text efficiently, Krita sucks at editing.
>>7752263Absolutely not, because Photoshop can handle well the painterly brushes, while CSP would lag if a simple brush is too big.Also, the most breathtaking art pieces were almost always done in Photoshop, because of those painterly brushes.Sure, now you will say the hard round meme, but we all know that, sooner or later, other brushes get involved.
>>7752328Yeah, Adobe stopped being cool after their CS6 suite. If I ever use photoshop again it will probably be CS6, CS4 at the oldest.
