I don't think we have anything to worry about, long-term. Just keep gitting gud.
>>7755084I have catastrophe fatigue.
>>7755084is this guy usually wrong or right i genuinely dont keep up someone tell me
is jeff bezos that bad, at least out of the billioniares he d oesnt come across as annoying as ellen musty, suckerberg or altmen
>>7755084I mean Jeff Bezos is right about many things. Like >>7755090 when their customer service phone lines need improvement, his customer service department rep counters that it's actually better by presenting the data that the time taken on average is bout 60 seconds or something. Jeff Bezos himself dialed the customer service in front of them, and it turns out it took 10 minutes. So he proceeded into dating "if anecdotes and data disagrees, usually the anecdote is right. You're measuring the wrong data". Maybe he sees it as just another pattern from his own experience.
>>7755105Just because a billionaire is smart enough to avoid being a constant public figure(a lost art in recent years) doesnt mean the stuff they actually do is good
>>7755137>dating*sayingFucking fat fingers on tiny keypad
>>7755084he's right. all these ai companies are pumping each other up by passing money around and getting investors hyped, but they haven't turned a profit and wont be able to for the foreseeable future.
>>7755140not saying they're good, just wonder if the criticism is actually comparable to actual evil demons like the other 3. at most it's just "he treats workers badly"
>>7755084keep coping, A.I. will continue to thrive and you can't stop itadapt or be left behind>>7755145what's going to stop it, the government? hackers?solar flare?it will continue to the future regard less of what you want it to see end up
>bro trust the billionaire with multiple mansion bunkers across the world whose interests go against the publics, I'm sure he'll tell us the truthStay still frogs, just let the pot do its thing.
>>7755190>FINALLY make it after 10 years of trying>great depression 2 electric boogaloo>no one has money anymore>widespread famine>people getting shanked for bread in the streets>widespread disease>at least you finally got good
>>7755190>billionaire says the sky is blue, he must be wrongYou faggots are only capable of crying, because anything else either collapses or led to capatalism with extra steps. You won't do shit because there's nothing left to do.
>>7755207bootlicker
>>7755183>A.I. will continue to thriveAI is not making money, and as a business, that's the opposite of thriving.>what's going to stop it(?)The not making money thing. It turns out business need to make money.
>>7755183>what's going to stop it, when shareholders realize they've been duped, they'll pull their money out and the whole thing will come crashing down.
>>7755224Don't be dumb, the shareholders know exactly what's going on, that's why they're investing. It's a free money printer until the plug gets pulled and the last one holding the bag loses. And if the past is anything to go by, that's going to be retail traders and the general public after all the big traders get bailed out by the government in some trillion dollar relief package.
>>7755229if its an Obama economy, maybe, but we literally won't have the leverage for that now. This is going to be 1920s bad.
>>7755183Those AI anime girls you generated all by yourself look so good! I'm very proud of you saar!
>>7755084we have a lot to worry about, that bubble is basically the entire US economy, AI affected the dollar more than all other factors put together. we're all fucked when it bursts
>>7755084what about all those anons that got broken because of AI, and gave up?all those sites that got spammed with ai, and became almost unusable, damaged is done, sadly
>>7755285>what about all those anons that got broken because of AI, and gave up?And nothing of value was lost
>>7755183>>7755145>AI coming whether you like it or not luddite>Adapt or be left behindWhy do AI bros always only say this and only this? The average pagan tribesman has more intellectual depth than them. It's like the only weapon in their arsenal is FOMO and they're trying to pass their desperation onto others so their industry doesn't tank.
AI is based. Crying about AI is like crying about photoshop. No rules only tools.
>>7755294that's just ignorant though. the strong-minded may not be talented and produce worthwhile work and the meek may have good potential. besides, look at those who rose to the top, mostly slop producers who actually wouldn't be missed if they were replaced by AI. given you need some mental toughness to make it anywhere but you're being disingenuous.>>7755285there is a lot more wrong with digital art and the modern art industry than just AI. stalkers, paywall platforms being shit, the indie industry being garbage, general lack of interest in new and interesting art direction by hollywood, art schools being scams, the social media algorithm being ass, lack of good artist communities online, lack of good new IPs to inspire a new generation (I fear what the skibidi generation of artists would be like)... the list goes on.the fix isn't that complicated though, as long as the artist cares about the art and there are people around him or her who support the works then people will get through it. microwave meals and fast food didn't kill off real cookery.
>>7755084I get it. It's massively demoralizing. You spend 5 years learning to render and some techbro generates your magnum opus in 30 seconds by typing "goth gf, big tiddy, Greg Rutkowski". The blackpill is hard to swallow.But dropping the pencil entirely is peak retard-tier. You're thinking about it all wrong.>You think drawing is a race to a finished product. It's not.>It's literally rewiring your brain. You are forcing your monkey brain to observe the real world, break it down into forms, light, and shadow, and then reconstruct it.>This is a fundamental problem-solving skill. It's applied visual literacy.>You can storyboard an idea, design a chair, sketch a map for your buddies, explain a mechanism. You can think visually.A promptcel can only describe things that already exist. He's a glorified image searcher. He has zero creative agency beyond the words he can type. He is a pure consumer.The guy who can actually draw can look at a generated image and say "the perspective is fucked, the anatomy is impossible, the lighting makes no sense". He can fix it. He can use the AI as a tool for a single layer, then paint over it, photobash it, and turn a soulless generation into something with intent.Stop thinking of drawing as a job that a robot is going to take. Start thinking of it as a fundamental human skill, like being able to cook or fix a leaky faucet. It makes you more capable and less dependent on the machine.Stop seething and go fill a page in your sketchbook. It's brain training for the apocalypse.
>>7755090it doesn't matter if he's right or not. It's obvious that AI is a bubble like the 00s one. Bunch of tech grifters pumping each other and lying to investors about what AI can do when it really can't. They've been saying for 2+ years that their internal models have reached sentience and other crap, yet none of their released updates since have shown any worthwhile improvements. There's also 5 gorillion companies all trying to cash in on the trend.I don't think AI will die nor go away, but it's going to implode within 5 years and bite a lot of people.
>>7755326>>It's like the only weapon in their arsenal is FOMO and they're trying to pass their desperation onto others so their industry doesn't tank.That's exactly it, and it's the same shit all AI CEOs are doing to investors. All these LLMs cost a billion gorillion dollars to develop and maintain, and are basically making 0 money. Their only hope of survival is to make as many people as possible entirely dependent on them to function, so when they turn around and make them a paid service, they have no option but to shell out. If tomorrow GPT became paid, it'd lose 99% of its users, that's why they are pushing hard to make everyone retarded and rely on GPT to do their work or finish school assignments, so retard normies can't function in society without it.
>>7755356>He can fix it. He can use the AI as a tool for a single layer, then paint over it, photobash it, and turn a soulless generation into something with intent.I disagree, it cannot be used by as a tool, it goes against what a piece of art is.
>>7755370>>7755356Forgot to add. That's just gigacope from turboshitters like you that need 40 lines of paragraphs on why it's demoralizing and why it can be used as a tool.That's all, i think you are a bitch.
I love my electricity costing 5 times for no reason!
>>7755415That's due to carbon taxes from the climate change hoax. AI is a bubble, don't pay attention to it. Everything is fine.
>>7755416Ah yes, I shall ignore my country setting up projects to increase generation by 20% annual use where it directly quotes growing datacenter needs!
>>7755183>the loudest proponent of AIslop is also the least capable of using them effectivelyWhat is this phenomenon called?
>>7755280That's the only thing I am concerned about with AI. Hitler Mario costed tech bros billions of dollars to create amd and they keep burning money to force it into being a thing. I'd still say that AI is just advanced pattern recognition than actually makinf anything though.
>>7755431Governments are now forcing multiple sectors to use AI, it's not only art and education now, shame it's kinda worthless, if everyone can make a thesis with AI then the thesis are worthless. We were promised robots, curing diseases, robo waifus and helping Elon Shart not die in poe2. Instead we got reddit slop everywhere and online companies getting bankrupted https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQEOMgdzBI4
>>7755105Isn’t amazon the one that made the wage cage
>>7755356Are you a fucking bot, everything in this post reads like a LMMTard Bot, Nothing makes fucking sense here, you say that AI art is demoralizing then say >"He can fix it. He can use the AI as a tool for a single layer, then paint over it, photobash it, and turn a soulless generation into something with intent."Like what the actual fuck? Is your LMM Brain retarded or something? AI cannot make art with intent. This post makes no fucking sense. Im starting to think none of you are real anymore and im red pilled
>>7755447Yup. Except I would extend it from governments to stupid people, and since stupid people are everywhere slop is spreading like a fungus.Come to think of it, the sentence “AI will kill us” has the same meaning as “bleach will kill you”. It’s an inanimate object on the shelf, you have to actively ingest it to harm you.
>>7755362But making everyone in society a bumbling retard monkey is imprudent, isn't it? They're trying to take money from people who aren't productive because of their own doing. If the consumer masses become fleshbags who have no worth outside of being AI beggers, why don't they just use AI and skip the human part? You can't take someone whose worth nothing, can you? What's their endgame? Did they even think it through? American companies are notoriously short sighted in that regard. Perhaps there will be a great economic change when everyone becomes drooling retards who can't contribute anything? Maybe the fleshbags will function as good batteries lol.
>>7755447>>7755473I don't get why they're trying to push ai onto multiple sectors. What do the government have to gain by forcing this? An agenda to save the economy and stop the bubble from popping? What kind of future are they trying to build?
>>7755485When people are telling you that its the future after they spent billions of dollars on the tech, the tech illiterate politicians are gonna think the tech is valuable
>>7755477You dense motherfucker. When will you come to the conclusion that LLMs have no intelligence? They can’t do anything. Businesses that install them are getting burned left and right. OpenAI recently published an admission themselves that hallucinations are mathematically unavoidable (probably to pivot over to some grand regulation later). It’s a fucking scam to resell the knowledge already present on the Internet back to you. The dumbing down comes from the fact that chatbot consumers just go on autopilot because they get an electronic buddy that agrees with them. It’s literally a websearch that structures its responses as if it's having a discussion with you.
>>7755487>Second Stage of Grief: Anger
>>7755477>What's their endgame? Did they even think it through? American companies are notoriously short sighted in that regard. Perhaps there will be a great economic change when everyone becomes drooling retards who can't contribute anything?Every single CEO, especially in America nowadays don't have a growth mindset, only a "cash now as much as you can, someone later can eat up the consequences". They are crashing society to make as much money as possible now. If they can create a cattle dystopia great, if not they'll retreat to their bunkers in Hawaii with infinite resources while everyone else fucking dies.
>>7755084I don't use AI because it is of Satan. Also, I have yet to see an AI generation that I would include among my favorite works of art, and it's not even close.
>>7755084the amount of money wasted on machine learning data centers is insane. and all they produce currently are yellow tinted memes for retards. its a massive bubble that generates no profit. so the only reasonable explanation is training models and eventually using it for propaganda and excuse to attack population/crackdown on internet freedom of speech/anonymity. theyll demand digital IDs and censorship with laws against AI use for porn of people, etc. free AI use will be gone and only governments, etc will use paid options all while monitoring and digital control of internet finally secured.
>>7755137>Jeff Bezos himself dialed the customer service in front of them, and it turns out it took 10 minutes.Neat reality check
>>7755084I think if yo are good you can compete with AI. That said AI is very good and very cheap and will only get better, though the improvement might be somewhat more capped than originally feared.I would not recommend this hobby as a career, though.
I still think they'll regulate AI until it's unusable at some point. Not to protect my rights or the environment, nobody gives a shit about that, but there's no way we plebs get to keep it once it actually works.
>>7755779I doubt they're going to regulate it unless someone definitively wins the imaginary arms race. There's still too much cope potential in continuing to throw obscene amounts of money at it. Much of the hype has to do with being able to present it as a thing that's happening RIGHT NOW wow much future. Otherwise it'd be vaporware tech like fusion that no one cares about.
>>7755370>it cannot be used by as a toolIt's never been designed as a tool, is the truth of it. It's not designed for artists and professionals to use. It's not like Photoshop or AutoCAD. It's for the higher ups who want to cut down their workforce. That's who they're selling AI to.
>>7755084oh no no no no ahahahahaa
>>7755183So who are you stealing from this time?
call me paranoid, but I'm suspicious of everyone suddenly pointing out that the burst is imminent, it's like they want people pulling outnot in the sense that I think AI isn't a meme, but I don't understand the angle
>>7755105A billionaire can never be goodPoor and money corrupts everyone
>>7755105supposedly amazon working conditions are abysmal, like the delivery guys need to make 3 stops per minute with 3 addresses per stop on averageplus the media amazon produces is pure goyslop in a way that feels aggressive rather than following trends
>>7756171everyone is saying its a bubble because it's impossible to ignore the economic reality of the situation where ai companies are being massively overvalued compared to their actual profits, of which 95% of them are in the red, ai companies know they're in a bubble but they say they can reach AGI before it bursts in which case the amount of money they'll make will be incalculable and the risk will have been worth it. it's a pretty horrible gamble to make and it's most likely just a lie to generate hype because they need constant infusions of venture capital to keep the party going.when the dot com bubble burst, companies made things worse because of dumb loans to eachother, just incestuously passing money around to eachother like >>7755145 it kept the bubble going for another year, but the economic damage was made worse for it. when over half the current economy is just AI tech companies pumping eachother, we're talking about potentially millions of people's 401ks wiped out overnight. thousands of suicides, and the government will be forced to bail out the ai companies with the tax dollars of the people whose lives they ruined to keep it from spiraling any further out of control.
Normies won't give much of a fuck, AI gen is a novelty for them and if the AI bubble collapses it wont matter because they've already got their fill of meme spam. Only AI cultists that unironically think AI-waifus and one-click Hollywood caliber films are around the corner will be pissed. And Indians.The real damage has already been done though, with models that can be run on local machines and custom trained with LoRA to rip off any existing artist. This is basically permanent brain damage to art. You will now never be able to tell if some beg-tier fraud is tracing/referencing AI, or doing shit like inpainting faces or have AI backgrounds that they blur to hide. It's gonna take some Nuremberg trial level shit to bring these tech faggots and complacent legislators to their heel and I doubt that will happen.
>>7756345>models that can be run on local machines and custom trained with LoRA to rip off any existing artist. This is basically permanent brain damage to art. You will now never be able to tell if some beg-tier fraud is tracing/referencing AI, or doing shit like inpainting faces or have AI backgrounds that they blur to hide.This is based though. No rules only tools
>>7756212>thousands of suicidesthere were thousands of suicides just from the crypto dip two days ago from people losing all leveraged moneywe're in for a ride if this goes tits up
>>7756345>if the AI bubble collapses it wont matterThe bubble bursting would effectively delete everyone's savings.
>>7756380It will only delete your savings if you bought into the Jewish stock market.I didn’t do that because I don’t want my fortunes to be tied to the fortunes of megacorps that hate me.
>>7756452Nigger, how do you think savings work? Everyone's 401k will be fucking gone. There is literally no scenario in which you don't walk out of this poorer unless you literally have nothing to your name
>>7755105All billionaires rape and drink the blood of children, so all of them are evil.
>>7756345if the gov was competent and actually gave a shit about society they would just use the intel backdoors or whatever and they could use the to detect whenever some shitter was cooking up some ai fraudslop but they wont.
>>7755326>Why do AI bros always only say this and only this?Cause if you’ll notice, they’re unironic cultists - they’re literally recycling rapture jargon because they’re so mentally ill that they use AI as a phony god (which is also why they’ll rope themselves when the bubble pops)
>>7755084it's a bubblein the same way the internet was once a bubblebut the internet did change everythingwe'll see what the world looks like when this settles down
>>7755084>I don't think we have anything to worry about, long-termWe never did. DC comics just banned AI art forever and SoraAI 2 is already lobotomized by copyright restrictions.
>>7756997>SoraAI 2 is already lobotomized by copyright restrictions.Good riddance
>>7756997>DC comics just banned AI art foreverThe same way Magic the Gathering did?Companies will say they won't do something... until they just decide that they'll do it anyway, because fuck their morals.
>>7755370>it cannot be used by as a toolAnything can be used as a tool. AI (whole category of technology, not just generative AI) can be considered a super tool that's capable of almost anything and can be adjusted for your needs>it goes against what a piece of art is.That's an okay opinion to have. I'm sure that the old masters would say the same thing about digital art in general despite millions of artists using that medium and considering their work to be authentic expressions of their human spirit.
>>7757034>AI (whole category of technology, not just generative AI) can be considered a super tool that's capable of almost anything and can be adjusted for your needsIt can't. Let's say i want AI to do the flat on my line art by using the colors that i choose, it can't.You are garbage, a failed artist and a scammer. Seethe and cope all you want, you will never be an artist, you will ALWAYS cry about talent, you will always be a low IQ retard.
>>7757144>Let's say i want AI to do the flat on my line art by using the colors that i choose, it can't. Your ignorance of technology is comical. CSP does that easily. You probably benefit from AI related technologies every day without even realizing it
>>7757167>CSP does that easily.It doesn't, it's extremely time consuming to do flats and basic shadows. You will never be an artist.
>>7757034>capable of almost anythingYet it still struggles to produce anything. Text generation straight up lies to you.
>>7757168CSP does have a colorizer AI, but it's really fucking bad and still in beta.I don't get why you would need this anyway, coloring doesn't take that long.
>>7756380>investors greed playing around with funny money>burst>big gov heeelppp!
>>7755330This anon gets the gist of it, but the most critical lacking, is the lack of integrity.
>>7755105he's not annoying or too cringe inducing and doesnt fall into the weird cultist shit most billionares do but he also owns the company that came up with the wage cages so he's very much amoral
>>7755433Indians
>>7755477>But making everyone in society a bumbling retard monkey is imprudent, isn't it?The less power you have over your life, the more power the government does. THINK, retard
>>7755084more concerned with llm slop in shows (I assume it's already being used heavily especially for scene transitions) because no one cares about good writing, than gen art being used in an anime anytime soon. Instagram models are likely going the way of the radio star.
>>7756347>people actually think tracing AI is a bad thingngmi mindset
>>7757750>Instagram models are likely going the way of the radio star.wtf I love AI now
>>7756171The sooner the bubble bursts, the less painful it will be. If your main business is selling people consumer crap, you want the inevitable recession to be as small and as short-lasting as possible.
Benefits of GenAI:>silly memeslop>companies can advertise moreDetriments of GenAI:>ruined search engines>political propaganda>falsified evidence/bodycam footage>blackmail/revenge porn>AI CP>hack artists>fake news articles>absolutely not being able to trust anything you see on the internet whatsoever even if it is “verified” footage from a “trusted” sourceThe AI bubble has popped for tech cultists who thought we’re all going to merge our consciousness and become superhuman. But the rest of the world was not ready for generative AI in the first place and we will suffer immensely for it.
>>7757920True. Generative AI has been a net negative on humanity. The world would be better off without it. Anyone who disagrees is a grifter or a drooling idiot who simply doesn't want his gacha toy to be taken away.
>>7755183It literally copypasted the exact same face in both pictures LMAO my sidesKeep FOMOposting, I'm not buying your bags, faggot
>>7757026>Companies will say they won't do something... until they just decide that they'll do it anywayDon't get me wrong, I don't trust companies either, they'll do anything for profit, including using AI art, but DC comics and other art companies won't use AI art because they can't own the art generated by AI.>INB4>AI art is fair useFar too risky, and companies are averse to taking risks, there's a reason why OpenAI is censoring Sora 2 just days after its launch, most companies don't fuck with copyright.>Picrel is extremely relevant
>>7757955>fair use>Far too riskyHere's a great example:>Anthropic will pay $1.5 billion to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by authors who alleged the company used pirated copies of their books to train its AI, Claude,. The settlement, filed in a San Francisco federal court, is believed to be the largest copyright settlement in history and is considered a landmark case for AI and copyright law. Authors who opt in are eligible for a share of the fund, and the settlement includes provisions for destroying the datasets used and other requirements.
>>7757974That's a funny case, the AI company wouldn't lost so much money if they did everything properly, like buy the books and maybe pay a license, idk, but they did what every other AI company did and trained their model on pirated copies on Libgen, TPB, etc so you can imagine how much money a bigger fish would lose on the same case, Meta would lost $22B+
>>7755183This regurgitated sentence of "adapt or die" is so obnoxiously dishonest. You come on here, an art forum, implying that you're some kind of evolutionary adaptation of an artist. Implying becoming a lazy scammer instead of having integrity and practicing actual creativity is the natural progression of things. You're a parasitical midwit-bugman coming on here to spread your ideological beliefs, spreading doom and trying to convince actual artists that you and your moronic ilk are superior to us, thinking your opinion holds any sway here. Akin to one of those employees at an indian call center calling up 70 year olds in order to scam them of their retirement money.We like you even less than the normies do. And the majority of them already hate you. You're a piece of shit who's too mentally inept to think critically.Just know your place promptnerd. We are not your peers - we are your superiors in the natural order of things. Get it right parasite.
>>7755183>Just a few more trillion dollars, in 2 weeks we can start the 150 year countdown before you turn a profit.It's a bubble at best, and the world's most successful con at worst, anon. Investors do not care about whatever gooner slop you like making.
>>7755433They're called "marks"
>>7755285I almost gave up. This shit unironically made me spiral into depression, when it exploded in popularity.I wasn't really surprised about some Silicon Valley kikes trying to fuck over everyone to make a quick buck. I also kinda expected their hordes of mindbroken corpo slaves. I wasn't ready to see how the average person would react though. You can attribute AI zealotry to plain retardation and ignore the minority of tech chuds throwing hissyfits as their cognitive dissonances unravel in real time. But I really thought that the average guy you'd meet anywhere would have at least a wrinkle of appreciation for the monstrous amount of media they consume every day, given any thought to their favorite movies or books...They don't. They don't give a shit. They don't ask how the sausage is made, or by who. They don't care, they never did, they never will. They will put machine slop on the same level as historical masterpieces on their Twitter feed, like both equally (which means not at all) and scroll past both equally. They don't see anything wrong with boiling Ghibli masterpieces down into a formless soup and belch its mangled "aesthetics" on everything they see. If it looks cool, they will slurp it up, shit it out, and move on to the next thing.AI came and soon it will go, but I won't forget, and you shouldn't either. Only you and a minuscule handful of enlightened retards who dared pick up a camera or a pen even have the ability to care at all. Make art for yourself, and no one else.
>>7755084.com was a bubble too, didn't stop it from being one of the most important assets of the modern world after the bubble poppedThe bubble is purely economic, AI is there to stay, it's just that all the nothing burger grifting will calm down
>>7758082>I really thought that the average guy you'd meet anywhere would have at least a wrinkle of appreciation for the monstrous amount of media they consume every day, given any thought to their favorite movies or books...>They don't. They don't give a shit.But they do care, that's part of why businesses aren't promoting their products as AI generated product, they know that consumers hate AI, only a loud minority of lazy UBI cultists and Investors love AI products and say AI is the future.The other anon mentioned Magic, but that's the company using AI, the card players are doing witch hunts on MTG artists that use AI. Lots of people hate AI art with a burning passion.
>>7758099MTG players are based, they should fuck AI artists in the ass for their bullshit. WoTC is a (((business))) so you can expect anything from them, from woke cards to AI art. Even Disnoy cards and Furfags are better than them and that's saying something.
>>7755183Namaste sarr
>>7758099>picrelFinally something good starting to come out of AI. First people rebel against AI-slop, now they will ditch hand-made slop. I have no symapthy for artstation render-monkeys churning up endless merc wips, fantasy landscapes and sci-fi armors.
>>7755326it's a script, they're not "bros" or anything, they're bots
>>7758099>>7758153This is good news. If AI will bring in a new age of originality instead of the stale, safe artstation slop people make I'm all for it.A couple years back I thought I didn't like art anymore, that it was stale to me, until I realized that I was looking at generic "Hire me for your game pls" art instead of anything actually creative.
>>7756212Do we know when the AI bubble is going to burst?
>>7758082I feel similar. I feel like some of the "bots" i see are just drooling retards that are addicted to AI like drugs and cant help themselves but spam it everywhere, and want to reduce all media into 5 seconds of dopamine for some haha funny look at the ai animating someones elses work while using up a massive amount of water and energy, and money that tax payers will have to pay once the government tries to bail out the slop companies.Part of it i feel like is consumer culture and disconnect from personal responsibility to the whole and people neglecting that there is actually another person on the other side that but instead they just treat everyone like a mcdonalds worker as mere means to an end, and this applies to everything not just art.
>>7755153>most it's just "he treats workers badly"You're on welfare aren't you
>>7758099AI made certain art styles worthless
>>7757974>destroying the datasets usedDid they trick a bunch of boomer lawyers or something, destroying the datasets does nothing, they need to destroy the models that learned on the data and redo them without the copyrighted data for anyone not opting in.
they're getting desperate
>>7755357>Bunch of tech grifters pumping each other and lying to investors about what AI can do when it really can't.your cope is fantastic, current grok can create full cgi characters without much effort, big tech is investing in development of this shit to push it to mass usage or industry usage so save money and cut corners and costs, nobody fucking need artists because they become too expensive and overdemanding
>>7758099AI was trained with Artstation and similar art. Make no mistake, these """""""""artists"""""""" just photobashed people and painted over them, a lot of digital art was already mediocre, basically git gud or GTFO.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2s8I6yBrxEAlso LOL LM AORIOFRIKROLROLOLOLOLLOLOLOLOLOLXD!!!xD!Make no mistake , Jeets are still going to be able to scam others with art and code because local models for the lesser but holy shit RIP large models
>>7759229>current grok can create full cgi characters without much effort>big tech is investing in development of this shit to push it to mass usage or industry usagedamn, it's over brosai can create full chin characters without much effortas soon as big tech invests enough money to make it usable in uhm industry and at uhhhhhh scale, it will be over, they will be able to make full cgi characters without much effort in the industry
>>7759236AI fags say that this obvious thing is a meme despite research from 2023 proving that it happens and now your link.>https://www.anthropic.com/research/small-samples-poison
>>7758268unless you can find a counterexample. im a fan of good arguments and not just reacting off of vibes, seems low intelligenceand i looked up the wage cage, its for working in a robotics heavy area to protect the workersi think he did cheat on his wife or something though
>>7756463Bro you didn’t buy gold and silver?
>>7756212>AGINot possible unless you want to take the whole world and use all its resources solely for AI slop, and thinking people will just let every bit of resources used to survive be solely for it. they fed it the entire library of human knowlege and it still hallucinates because it has no grounding in reality as well as being a turing machine. The tech bros will just endup trying to create a more inefficient human simply due to resource usage
>>7759236>this is what the average prooomptcel believeslollmao evenHere's a (You) for the effort of holding shift for those quotes
>>7759294Sar malding
>>7759294>pop
>>7758241it can go on indefinitely as long as they can convince people to continue to invest in the promise of it. passing around the money is good for giving off the impression of good economic activity and raising stock prices, but internally these companies are having to spend some of it on internal upkeep costs like building infrastructure and paying salaries.as long as there's enough hype that investors pump them with enough money to offset these costs it's not a problem. but once they come up a bit short the whole thing collapses like a house of cards.
>>7759260you can't convince them because they'll just prompt their AI to ask why it's not true, and then it'll say>yes, you're so perceptive to understand that this is not true, let me break down why you're right,because it's designed to suck you off like that.
>>7759421Just let them get psychosis and then they will use it alot less. Happened to me. If most search engines didnt become near unusable alot of the AI would lose more ground.
