Do you need more?https://archive.org/details/davincionpainting00leon
>>7758800You think low iq trannime fags can into davinci?
>>7758800>https://archive.org/details/davincionpainting00leonMy kind of tism
Thanks anon. Got any more books
My college library has that book i always go look at it
>>7758800it's excellent in many ways, but dated. also, too theoretical, like, no plates to study from
>>7758800Very nice.
>>7763842The drawings are at the end of the book. Try the gutenberg version. It tries to place the figure drawings near the relevant texts.>>7758800I got 2 questions.1. Are they actually Da Vinci’s drawings? Looks really clean. Either because they cleaned up the drawings, or someone else drew everything for the book.2. Are they drawings lost or something? I get he’s smarter than most humans. But no example drawings to illustrate most of his lessons?
Any painter that died before 1600 was objectively trash and would not be of notable skill by today's standards. Prove me wrong.
>>7766399>The drawings are at the end of the book. Try the gutenberg version. It tries to place the figure drawings near the relevant texts.> 1. Are they actually Da Vinci’s drawings? Looks really clean. Either because they cleaned up the drawings, or someone else drew everything for the book.no, none of those are Leonardo's: proportions are off, figures ungraceful, all is very remote from his sketches and pieces.Leonardo left a bunch of rough notes, which were compiled by one of his pupils after his death. he planned a course, but didn't had, or didn't took the time to finish it.I guess this answers you second question as well.> I get he’s smarter than most humans. But no example drawings to illustrate most of his lessons?drawing was only a small part in his life. you may find printed copies of his notebooks. by reading them, you'll be able to glance at how he was thinking, studying. in particular, he's studying *everything*, and tries to build a rational, coherent understand of everything.in this regard, his approach is very close to Aristotle's.Leonardo's intelligence has nothing to do with what we commonly understand as being "smart": it's a relentless quest of knowledge, for its own sake. deep curiosity. contemporary "smart" people are on the lookout for knowledge for fame, social recognition, and so forth.very, very different mindset, although they may look superficially similar.it's a good idea to try to push oneself in the shoes of "great" historical men, fwiw.
>>7766714you'll be able to get a feel for how he was thinking*to put oneself*and so forth. my bad.
>>7766714>contemporary "smart" people are on the lookout for knowledge for fame, social recognition, and so forth.Literally me, expect im not smart lolLike, ive finally gotten around to study the topics i was supposed to learn in highschool just because ive found that having general knowledge is very helpful for writing fiction...
>>7758828Davinci is good, yeah.Good anime art is really nice though. But Whatever . The trad nerds can beat off to classical paintings all day if they want.
>>7766714>you may find printed copies of his notebooks. by reading them, you'll be able to glance at how he was thinking, studying. I'm from Bulgaria so I doubt my local library would have anything like that, are there any available online like on the internet archive or other online library?Sounds like if anything it would be an interesting read.
>>7766767What topics would those be
>>7768717sorry, I've got this one https://www.amazon.com/Carnets-Pascal-Brioist/dp/207284486X but it's a French book, not translated from English to French.I'm sure you can find various English versions online though>>7766767oh, that doesn't seem to be what I had in mind. you've found a way to self-motivate to learn, that's rather good.I was more thinking about some top-school performers, say
