[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


So i was talking with some anons about this tumblr drawing, right? And they said its ugly.

how exactly? The anatomy is okay, the artstyle is okay and there's no bullshit like the infamous tumblr nose. Problemo?
>>
>>7771973
I dont find it particularly ugly, its just incomplete because it has no shadows. I like it.
>>
>>7771973
Looks demonic and pedophilic. I instinctively hate it.
>>
depends on the context it is seen. imagine seeing it as a tattoo, ugly. on a church wall, ugly. on tumblr? par for the course, in adventure time inspired tv show? probably ok.
>>
>>7771973
More bland than anything.
>>
sex
>>
she looks like she fucks human men
>>
>>7771973
they don't like it but they aren't precise with their words, so its easier just calling it "ugly"
>>
>no breasts
>no ass
>a fucking tummy
how would you fix this?
>>
>>7772040
>bigger boobs
>bigger ass
>bigger tummy
>>
>>7772066
ok
>>
>>7771975
Something is not "incomplete" because it has no shadows, moron.
>>
>>7771973
Explain what attributes the drawing has that make it not-ugly
>>
>>7772614
i dunno it looks cute
>>
Feels like the inside of the thigh/leg should have a paler fur tone like deers do in nature
>>
not ugly, just very amateur, which is fine, but its very clearly drawn by someone whos not all that experienced yet
>>
idk
>>
>>7771973
What anons aren't pointing out to you is that she doesn't have a pelvis. Like this bitch is basically a fauna but she goes straight from tummy to legs, no pelvis in sight. Just look up cartoon fauna or centaurs, we should be seeing her bush man. Also while your at it trim the feet to make ot more like hooves, when they are sharp like that it looks like she's constantly tip-toing
>>
File: lineweight.jpg (50 KB, 1422x800)
50 KB
50 KB JPG
aside from the simple artstyle, there's no line weight whatsoever
>>
>>7772837
For this style in particular I think lineweight would bring things down since it break the flow of the simple forms. It definitely lacks detail and a proper use of lines to express form, the right type of hatching and balance between thick and thin line to ground things better it be more beneficial outside normal line weight.
>>
>>7772840
thois
>>
File: 1761406050064594.png (101 KB, 434x750)
101 KB
101 KB PNG
>>7772037
This.
>>7771973
It's really a matter of taste, especially with something so deformed/stylised.
I like it, I think it's cute. I'd make the shirt longer though, the lack of visible pelvis makes it look a bit off. I also have a personal preference for long legs.
>>
>>7771973
guys this isn't his drawing, it's from 2021. stop giving him free advice

the only thing i would say is particularly ugly about it is that the stubble looks more like leg hair than fur, but that is a valid style
>>
>>7773083
i am just trying to learn from pieces i like and make /v/ review pieces so i can get advice, the pic is from some tumblr chick
>>
OP wanted to shit on the drawing because the person is trans.
>>
>>7772837
>shaky with inconsistent flow
lmao you cant even draw a line properly, embarrassing
>>
>>7771973
What anatomy? It's flat, more of a symbolic representation than an accurately portrayed body.
>>
>>7773735
idk they seem pretty fair to the drawing i think youre just making things up
>>
>>7773735
No.
>>
>>7771973
is this a very roundabout way to make a dtiys thread
>>
>>7773738
It's a skill I can improve. But you'll always be a faggot
>>
>>7773877
whats that
>>
>>7773970
Dtiys
>>
>>7774009
can someone do it?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.