This screenshot is true art. It encapsulates the modern man to a t.

>>7774644
i think it has to be ofc man made and made with true creative or expressive intent. technically coprorate clip art is art, but i wouldnt hold it to the standard of "art" if that makes sense. the bar can be as low as "human drawing" tho

>>7774644
To me:
>is it made by a human?
The reason being man made is important is because I believe there has to be some sort of intention behind a piece for me to consider it art. Sure, there can be an intention behind a prompt, but the image itself was made by a machine, the decisions were taken automatically. By the way, I think AI can be used as a tool to make art. I'm not completely against it. You just have to intervene it a considerable amount.
>does it make me feel something?
The feeling can't be too shallow, like feeling disgust or weirded out towards an inflation fetish drawing made in paint uploaded to DeviantArt, but that doesn't mean "disgust" or "weirded out" as feelings can't be a reaction one could have to art.
>is there a great demonstration of skill?
I was a bit on the fence about including this one, but sometimes you can appreciate something for the level of skill behind it alone. It can be enough to captivate you.

File: 27e45192b7c72bca7a47b247f(...).jpg (89 KB, 720x960)

89 KB JPG

>>7774644
there is a saying. "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder."

>>7774802
i think personally ai can be used to make art, but we're at a point where its kinda 'not in good taste' with how contentious it is. if you say you used ai in your art the majority of people will assume it means pure or majority ai generation, which either means youll lose 'cred' in art spaces or your entire audience will be AI shills. I respect what corridor digital did using AI to make an 'anime' a few years back cuz it still required a ton of actual film making and editing skill

>>7774644
To me, art is the experience when witnessing intention, craftsmanship, and meaning converge with expression, spontaneity, and subconsciousness. It needs both sides, and they need to play off one another. To some extent, how well they do so is up to the viewer's subjectove experience (even the artist is a viewer), but if that can't be well communicated, I feel less need to engage with their opinion. This is also why I do not see everything, or any inspiring/beautiful/evocative thing that happens to exist to be art. I do really detest such overly broad and terribly meaningless, vacuous definitions.

>>7774644
cue shiki

>>7775235
Yeah this is what I think too. You can definitely use AI as a tool to make art, as long as it's not purely or majorly generated as you said. I'm sure the general perception of it will change in a few years, when we start getting bigger projects that use it along human hand (that are good).

>>7774644

"true art" is art that's made for the sake of art, not clout or financial gains. very rare to see today

>>7774644
The product of a creative process, that evokes emotions and or thoughts.

>>7776030
Spoken like someone who hasn't drawn since grade school.

>>7774644
how close it resembles reality.
if i don't feel like i'm looking at a photograph then i'm not interested

>>7774644
if you are invested in your work and you put your heart into it

>>7774644
Expression that points to God (Truth, Beauty, the Good) and the Divine as revealed by Jesus Christ, the second Person of the Trinity and the Logos incarnate as expressed in the Nicene Creed and understood by the Church Fathers.
Anything else is craftsmanship, which is fine, but isn't capital "A" Art.

>>7774777
Or atleast it wasn't made by AI

>>7774644
being born in East Asia

>>7774644
wish I still had it but there was a definition I saw here once that resonated. there's no singular definition but there are several traits and real art must invest in one of them

- technical skill
- innovation in expression
- motivation above financial profit
- and either pursuit of the divine or 'art for art's' sake in more secular terms

seems like a pretty encompassing definition without pretending everything is art. if anyone has the copypasta then post it.

>>7774974
"It's not bad, you just huh gotta be in the mood or something for it!"
"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder" is the biggest crab bucket enabler in this universe
It's like the casting couch for acting, it's a bullshit barrier made by talentless hacks
Beauty is objectively provable by the negative, that some things infect your senses and cause repulsion and wanting to throw up (llike your mom), therefore, the opposite is empirical as well
Beauty objectively exist for everyone