How did this artist accidentally achieve soul, depth, 3D dimensionality, and personality on a throwaway doodle. when their supposedly finished artworks look like absolute beg slop>
>>7779574.
looks retardedyou're just blinded by coom
>>7779576it looks bad and has no personality. generic anime coomslop. those thigh squishes look so bad.. her skin looks like it's pants tucked into socks, not actual skin. moids are so retarded holy shit
>>7779577>>7779578you're not looking beyond the goon
>>7779580we're discussing soul not technique you illiterate nigger
>>7779574Wut. It's just your average twitter coomer artist
>>7779583it doesn't have soul
>>7779574Skills. They come from practice and dedication.No, for the fucking 10000th time, there is no magic pill. Stop being lazy and JUST DRAW.
>>7779580>moidsits not great, its ok though, the artist just needs to work on understanding the subject matter (flesh).either way, you're too critical of the drawing, while you haven't even posted your own work, or an edited version of OPs pic, showing your own techniqueyou should practice some self reflection
I was thinking maybe he referenced something but the fact that the perspective on the bottom of the sweater is wrong leads me away from that theory. Sometimes as an artist you get lucky and manage to draw something from your head that feels more right and is more dynamic than your other more stiffer works. The goal is to do it consistently.
what you need to learn is how to simplify detail and complex forms. if you look really really closely at it, its not AS impressive as it seems, but it just simplified a lot of complex detail really well. thats what art in general is, its all just giving off an impression of something
>>7779574This has long been a problem for many artists; they lose all the energy from their sketches as they polish and finalise things
>>7779580>moids are so retardedThe majority of retards are men and women are smarter on average so you're correct Femcel-chan.
>>7779574your jelly is showing
>>7779576>>7779574
>>7780499Based enjoychads
>>7779814Dawg youre not getting that 4chan femcel hole
>>7779814and yet women haven't done anything in history that would earn them that status and all the geniuses are men. Linux was created by a man, same with windows. The people who created www, IP, hypertext, html were all men. Tesla, Leonardo da Vinci, Shakespeare, Houdini... thousands of well known geniuses are all men
>>7780609Because machism as always been the default setting for most of humanitys history, dipshit, women were not allowed to even go to school until very recently. Bet you dont know who Marie Curie is, and like her there are a lot more, of course you wouldnt know that since you are too busy having your head to deep into your own ass.
>>7780628YOU.AINT.GETTING.THAT.4CHAN.PUSSY
>>7780609grace hopperada lovelace
>>7779574>drawing art for the worst Phase member
>>7780628and look what happened in just a century of women going to school...terrible, terrible mistake
>>7779814>>7779814>and women are smarter on averageImpressive that you cant even understand the graph (THAT YOU POSTED LOL) properly.Both Men and women Peak at the same spot, meaning the average IQ for women and men is the same. The central tendency is identical for the sexesThe graph means that both the boys and the girls have the same average iq, but boys are more likely to be far from average (in a positive or negative way). This pretty much means that more male geniuses has nothing to do with "machism" as you say, its natural variance.
>>7780628>Bet you dont know who Marie Curie is,Yes, she's an edge case.> and like her there are a lot moreUh no, Marie Curie and Ada (Not really the first programmer btw) are mentioned often because they are a some of the *few* examples.Do you know that the graph above, while it means that there are more male anti-geniuses, it also confirms that women are way way way less likely than men to be geniuses? Seems like a good trade off ;)Women are less likely to be turbo-retards, but also less likely to be geniuses. This is confirmed by... welll, all of history lol
>>7779574having a good idea, spark of the moment, inspiration, motivation>>7779576VS just showing up for work, drawing when you really don't want to, just making your weekly pinup for your patreonbux
>>7781386it's hard to believe that women are not significantly more stupid on average.Could it be that men faked the data to appease women? Wouldn't be the first time
>>7780628Marie Curie was just following her late husbands work project (and findings), as in chemistry it was just a matter of time, not some ground breakthrough you think it was. This could have been achieved by anyone working with Pierre Curie, like an intern, nothing special, work had been done, only a matter of seeing project through. Curie case is so often used as some fucking "gotcha" when bringing up famous female achievements and yet its ironically the opposite, hence the same people typing Curies name like this :>Bet you dont know who Marie Curie isand then going :>and like her there are a lot moresince they don't know jack shit. If they knew these famous and ground breaking achievement of women you could throw them like a machinegun like Tesla, Einstein, DaVinci etc. because these people made achievements.
>>7779814>study from 1932Using data from a 100 years ago, from a time when you would've gotten beaten by your husband for saying something like this. Not to mention that the implications of this data are the exact opposite of what you would like (men being the only retards, but also the ONLY geniuses; and most women being midwits).
can these anons stop having the 1729373937th sexism rant jesus christ this is an art board gtfo>>7779574>soul, depth, 3D dimensionality, and personality...where? the ass is decently drawn but everything else isn't. i guess if you don't tryhard and enjoy the process you'll get better results
