>>7814588
No

>>7814588
What does that have to do with your picture? Are you one of those retarded tourists than think digital artists use a mouse?

>>7814593
....no.........

Honestly they should've been doing it even before AI. Knowing how an artist thinks and approaches problems on the page gives you the same insights that having a programmer write code in front of you does.

coding interviews already did this years ago

I don't get the problem with AI, if the end result looks good, why does it matter?
People have been using techno tools to make jobs easier for decades now, that's why humans rule the world, not apes.

>>7814607
most studios do art tests unless you have industry experience

>>7814611

For studios there are definitely copyright issues to consider that are still in the early stages of being worked out.

>>7814611
AI is very limited and you have very little control over it. You don't draw or never have had a job.

construction fags won. tracefags/3D model crutch fags, and copy fags lost

>>7814620
My job is to draw, lol

>>7814588
Maybe? When people were first talking about theirs worries with AI, I pondered if we'd have a new Arts & Crafts movement, but we haven't seen much of a up-tick in interest for either traditional arts, or traditional crafts. That said, the hate for AI has been quite palpable and understated. Despite all the claims that normies don't care if something is AI, it's clear that they actually do care, and that's why AI usage is desperately covered up as much as possible to hide any backlash.
If it were just artists complaining, companies and AI users wouldn't care about the small rabble's complaints, but it's obvious that AI hate is a far more mainstream of an opinion than what is let on.

>>7814611
>I don't get the problem with AI, if the end result looks good, why does it matter?
Because studios require you to be able to change things to their exact specifications and demands; something that AI can't do, and something that requires actual drawing abilities. People using AI in their portfolios, while claiming they drew those images, are just being deceitful towards their employers; claiming to have skills, they simply do not.

There was a popular story sometime ago about an art director who had been told by her higher ups to hire and direct some AI users, instead of their usual artists, but whenever she asked them to make changes to an image - one that was close to what she wanted, mind you - they'd hand her an entirely different image, because they couldn't draw and generated an entirely new image for each bloody change.
Granted, it sounds like those AI users were outright incompetent, because even at that time you could do 'in-painting' and make changes to small sections, but a large issue with aiAIbut they're not, because they lack any sort of drive - including the drive to actually get good at fucking prompting as well - we get so much ghibli styled, piss filtered, slop.

>>7814626
For adverts? Because that's the only field where AI is used extensively. My condolences.

no, not at all

>>7814611
I'll bite, besides the legal stuff an artist hired for a studio is problem solving visual issues for a team, the ones who make stuff "too look good" are the outward customer facing artists. since image gen doesn't give you a ton of control (it's like a fancy gacha) if you hire a prompter instead of a trained artist your always going to have a problem of rolling the dice on a prompt until the "correct" one comes up. what employer would hire someone like that?

>>7814611
ai lacks problem solving skills, people who have illustration skills have those problem solving skills. Ai is much better at rendering sketches than actually "coming up with" new illustrations, errors pile up upon iterations of the same image and a person needs to in-paint to get it to look right. Really ai art is just a fundamental misunderstanding of what illustration is, its like a ceo firing his entire illustration team and replace them with his nephew who can trace gokus and vegetas really really well, he swears it, so clearly he can draw whatever he wants.

People who are stupid enough to think ai will do all the work for them arent smart enough to learn to draw in any capacity.

>>7814588
I am unafraid because I have 10 years of traditional painting experience AND programming experience before AI ever hit.

>>7814611
>if the end result looks good, why does it matter?
it doesnt. it's imprecise and not consistent at all. it's a randomizer at best

>>7814588
it doesn't matter. art was already ruined.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OHQRo3Uz_VQ

>>7814611
if you're dependent on AI it means you are a lot less useful than someone who can already draw but can learn AI in the next week

>>7814611
Does anyone have a >5m piece of quality animation that solely used AI ?

File: return to monke.jpg (51 KB, 680x541)

51 KB JPG

>>7814588
>>7814588
yes . but its not enough . we need to return to monke

>>7814687
no but in two more weeks the technology will be good enough to where you can generate it yourself.

>>7814696
I feel like it’s been two weeks away from being made for so long. I honestly feel like this is just big tech/ trump trying to make us too depressed to make art, so we don’t resist authoritarianism

>>7814611
go back to eating poo, dikshit.

>>7814687
The possibilities of AI in animation is the only thing that's interested me, and everything I've seen so far has been dogshit.
I haven't seen a single silver lining in this bleak grey ai sky

File: images (1).jpg (19 KB, 578x531)

19 KB JPG

>>7814611
If it doesn't matter, you'll tag it as AI

NO ONE LIKES FAKE

>>7814611
It doesn't look good lmao

>>7814611
this is a board for artists retard

>>7814766
No, I drew this :)

>>7814611
Every other company developing some AI product shuts down their project because of copyright issues or the AI going apeshit after too much money got invested into it
It's a scam and companies are pulling their hair out now that they're in sunk cost fallacy mode

I work for an IT company and I get constantly begged to make some random ass report saying that I magically saved 30% development time while in actually I didn't because the true bottleneck is the dogshit teams calls anyway and not the half a day of actual coding I have to do

I think as we continue down the current path, human art, especially human art that can be verified like OPs pic, will have a major resurgence of interest. People will associate AI with advertising and corporate Hollywood films and deliberately try to seek out something that conveys human expressionism that AI is unable to.

I can imagine that in 10 years people will buy tickets to see people paint live

>>7814876
We forget that the point of art wasn't originally to get famous on twitter, or hell, even necessarily look pretty. The point of art is expression, which humans have always craved and always will.

I don't think AI will ever go away, but I think people are underestimating humanities drive to connect through art.

>>7814588
>employers for once actually screen hiring candidates
>instead of relying on AI or dumb HR scums
Finally, maybe now unemployment will go down for real.
You could have an above average portfolio, but if you fail on their arbitrary formula or "personality"-tests. Your application is immediately discarded.
Could be something as trivial like you objecting to work on holidays. HR cockroaches who don't know jack shit about the field, will push your application aside because you didn't meet their stereotype of what you should know. Also if they don't like your explanation for "why do you have an employment gap here".

File: 1742996345917447.jpg (339 KB, 722x907)

339 KB JPG

>>7814588
Why do these histrionic faggots keep thinking Miyazaki is some le wholesome Japanese Disney grandpa? It reminds me of that shitty webcomic Zenpencils made.

>>7814611
The job posted is for artists, not prompters.

>>7814588
>another day another AI humiliation ritual

>>7815121
Also because probably they accidentally hired a prooompter, got outed as a prooompter, and ended up having to start the hiring process again. Wastes everyone's time

>>7814611
>I don't get the problem with AI, if the end result looks good, why does it matter?
the problem has many layers and is very dependent on individual perspectives
"looking good" is subjective. and that also has layers. something can look good superficially, but break apart when you start paying attention
something can look good for a package of peanuts, but be almost completely useless for concept art because it didn't develop any concepts, it didn't solve any problems, so you send it to a 3d modeler and they have no idea what those pocket looking things that actually seem to be attached to some sort of belt-- wait is that part of the coat?-- are so their job is suddenly harder
and sure, you can also get AI to do the 3d models directly
push the bullshit up
the more humans you remove from the process, the more bullshit ends up in the final result, obviously
and it's insidious. you add AI to your process as "just a tool" and suddenly you have a bullshit generator someone is going to have to deal with sooner or later. but it looks superficially OK. and everyone is overworked. better hope someone takes a closer look before the consumers do

>>7814588
Literally, handdrawn art and handwritten literature is all that will be safe from the Jeets.

>>7814611
>looks good

File: Crying Statue.jpg (179 KB, 1024x1024)

179 KB JPG

>>7815334
I think we're deluding ourselves if we say that none of it ever looks good, or that there aren't some artists out there who are using it well.
The big problem is that AI has been completely tarnished for the vast majority of the creative community, and the people who are enthusiastic about AI are some of the my uncreative dullards the world has ever seen.
They cheer and applaud, and pat each other on the back for how creative they are, for prompting the equivalent of fan art.
It's so rare for me to see an original thing made via AI - and the moment one is, the rest of the AI community immediately copycat the idea to death.
I seem to vaguely recall that AI big foot was popular because someone started a channel with the idea, only for every huckster to fuck that person over by stealing the concept and watering it down.

(picrel is AI btw, though you may not subjectively like it, you can't say it looks like shit either. It was made by a professional artist/graphic designer, who plays around with AI.)

File: G7ZcJjLXAAAvyBY.png (250 KB, 572x579)

250 KB PNG

>>7814588
They will still find a way to do it

>>7815345
Seriously. The reason why ai generated content is doing so well is because we have such a large population of drooling chuds with no taste

Can we have an holocaust for idiots? I feel like Covid was God trying to get rid of the fatties and smookers slowing us down

>>7814611
Clearly this studio has found that people who use AI without any artistic skill underneath are less valuable than an employee with just artistic skill. I don't see what your problem with that is. They're entitled to the best possible work if they wish to pay for it.

File: 5.png (347 KB, 598x548)

347 KB PNG

>>7815334
This shit has 200k likes, and most of the people weren't able to say it was AI until someone pointed out, there are even people saying they feel betrayed
Yeah, sometimes it looks good

>>7815345
Looks like melted AI shit to me, honestly. There's some passable AI art but it's always the most simplistic shit ever that exists in billions on the internet or it's so heavily edited the dude might as well have made it himself
>The big problem is that AI has been completely tarnished for the vast majority of the creative community, and the people who are enthusiastic about AI are some of the my uncreative dullards the world has ever seen.
A big part of creativity is the process. If all you do is typing random words in a gacha system you are more of a "producer" giving tips to someone than a creative in itself. A is just inhently anti-creativity.

>>7814620
>you have very little control over it
How?

>>7815663
Most people who say this shit only know generic chatgpt AI art.
You have stable diffusion with hundreds of models and thousands of loras trained on basicly any artist and arstyle ever and you can mix and match them.
People don't realize how many thousands of AI images they like or scroll past on a daily basis.

>>7815622
>le heckin science juice!
My heart is better than yours :) how about that 4th clotshot, "lillith"?
>le chuds!
Coomer-bux seethe~

>>7815687
How indeed. When you have a bunch of talentless faggots making slop anyhow, why not have thoss very same make corrections to the slop normies ALREADY enjoy?

It's already happening.

>>7814588
I am so bad I would fail to copy my own few "good" things, and I am not ironic...

File: wrwfwgrg.png (337 KB, 895x1287)

337 KB PNG

>>7814611
if that garbage is SOOOO good, then most of you faggots wouldn't lie about using it. Face it, you shitters know it's bad cause no one wants to commission that garbage, other al troons don't commission art in the first place, so your only option is to lie about it and get gullible people that none the wiser.

>>7815707
If it's bad why does this person had a vgen full of commissions all the time? You faggots only start to think it's bad once you know it's AI, the best part is that you didn't even know it wasn't until someone exposed her lol
Not you nor even one of those people asking for comissions
check the comments and quotes on this: >>7815663
It's over for anti AI faggots, you are being deceived more and more and someday you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anymore ;)

File: Untitled.png (2.91 MB, 1908x1188)

2.91 MB PNG

>>7815718
>saar look at those bot commissions saar look at those botted reviews saar all honest truth send money

Lmao

File: total ai death.png (60 KB, 309x361)

60 KB PNG

>>7815718
>think it's bad once you know it's AI,
yes

>>7815718
even if ai becomes the gold standard of efficiency, artists will still use it better than any slopper can. You act like its magical technology that takes years to master, yet providing ai a sketch to render makes it much more reliable and useful than generating images on prompts or references alone. Really its over for sloppers, your product is inferior, and you cant make anything without existing datasets.

>>7815707
>check the people that follow that i know tab
>its all japanese artists
without fail, every time

>>7815718
I think AI looks fine but is not good at anything truly new or creative
It makes convincing looking work that would normally be good for pinups or commissions, but people like the human element of knowing someone dedicated put care into the details of their character, it is a connection they do not feel with AI generations.
If you do not understand to desire for the human element, you are just autistic and will never understand why normal art will never go away. There are a myriad of other reasons, but in the case of simple posed commissions, the connection to the person who made the picture, and appreciation for art as a creative process, is what the client ultimately desires

>>7815707
Reported their fanbox for AI

>>7815737
Fanbox prohibits AI? What the fuck? Why can't pixiv do the same on the main website when the place has become filled with that shit to a point where it's unbearable to use it to find art

>>7815744
Once patreon bans Al content, then it's over for these faggots. For pixiv, probably due to those sloppers not make money from just posting there and inflate the site's value by making it seem like a lot of people are using it. It's the same with deviant art as well.

>>7815749
How would Patreon control it for potentially thousands of AI accounts?
It's not like they automatically know or all the accounts point it out. If anything most AI accounts go out of their way to hide it.

File: eafaefaefe.png (97 KB, 544x814)

97 KB PNG

>>7815760
You're right about that, but that's where reports comes in. Just like vegen banning this >>7815707
faggot once they became well aware. Though I doubt patreon will do anything about it, until some copyright/lawsuit nightmare scare happens. It's the same with steam, itchio, dlsite, etc cause money from those slop accounts.

>>7815707
looked at all the pics of their 'art' and its all basically just ripoffs of other artists' style. wtf. nothing wrong with inspirations or studies or following (ohisashiburi occasionally drops encouraging comments on tweets of people studying her art), but this example here has literally nothing but direct copies

also 'readers added context' is the fucking funniest thing in twitter, why the flying fuck has any other socmed sites not just copy it kek

>>7814588
Yes.

>>7815707
The problem is that 99% of people can't tell even with way more obvious accounts than this one. Anyone who used stable diffusion even once can instantly tell that it's just a WAI model traced and vectorized like most AI artists.
But they make hundreds or thousands a month with basic ass tracing and poses so why stop.

>>7815776
That's all it takes and shows how easy it is these days. Just grab some easy to trace models/lora and then spam generic gooner bait and art trends.
Most AI accounts are also really obvious since their artstyle just changes from one day to another and they suddenly post images daily.

>>7815707
How do people fall for this, do they not notice that people are just straight up using other peoples artstyles 1:1?
You can almost replicate this in a few seconds in SD.

>>7815881
>How do people fall for this,
non-artist aka fucking normies. You have to point out the obvious so they don't get scammed.

>>7814588
no. zoomers can't learn new skills. they were born only knowing shortcuts with the attention span of spaghetti. this is why they are the worst generation.

t. bimbamboomer

>>7815345
Clout chasing is a mistake. The moment anyone found anything popular everyone starts copying it because they want some of the profit/clout. Technically you can make AI useful for the actual demographic for specific tasks, but AIsloppers are more convinced into focusing on 'making the model better' so that prompters have to spend less effort. Which is stupid. The less effort and control you have the more homogenised the work become. If it's a production line then sure. But if it's designing some with clear intent, then AI is quite lacking in the control department. You can supplement it with controlnets, loras, using flux kontext or whatever but you need to be able to reliably predict an outcome with the controls you have. Most AIslop dont focus on integrating better/more seamless controls and instead focuses on training models 'to get better' but there's a diminishing return to that.

Also what, the designer made that pic with Comfy/Invoke?

File: 1621390701497.jpg (172 KB, 821x652)

172 KB JPG

>>7815718
>You faggots only start to think it's bad once you know it's AI
Correct.

>>7815718
>You faggots only start to think it's bad once you know it's AI
yet you dont give your mom shit for leaving your dad once she found out he was fucking the mailman. hypocrite much?

>>7815718
Yes, but i know right away.

>>7815920
I bet you're one of those (COMMISSIONS OPEN) faggots lol

File: waiN48584587.jpg (565 KB, 2048x2560)

565 KB JPG

>>7815707
>put artists image into danbooru tagger
>throw tags into SD with popular model
>get this
I'm an artist now!

>>7815922
your mom cummissioned me last night actually, twice

File: 1701827982450371.jpg (7 KB, 280x280)

7 KB JPG

>>7815927

>>7815707
This case is living rent free in my mind. What if i get accused of AI and can do nothing to prove it's not? Apparently videos or timelapses are not enough. So what if it happens to me? Am I just ruined?

>>7815943
Are you really that popular.
>Apparently videos or timelapses are not enough.
Yes they are, just set your phone in a way that your hands and monitor are visible at the same in a way that its reasonable, most of the timelapses are unnecesarily zoomed out and are ayylmao 2009 tier in terms of quality.

>>7815943
Just draw shit on a livestream, maybe even on paper instead of digital. And overall most real artists won't get accused of it or looked into it that much.

>>7815943
be active in art circles, post shit often even wips, make friends and they'll vouch for you unless you're a standard /ic/ sperg then idk

>>7815975
/ic/ will be against you

>>7816000
ic is against everyone even themselves

>>7815943
100% of ai tracers are obvious to people who actually draw. It takes hard evidence like chromakey or finding the original ai pic to nail the aifag for a normie. If you actually draw, you have nothing to worry about.

>>7815903
>Also what, the designer made that pic with Comfy/Invoke?
No, I believe it was a straight prompt on a browser based generator, but the artist actually writes up full javascript code to stylise the image, like line widths and the exact colour palette and such.
I'd take a quick look at his profile because I seem to recall that he tells you the exact site he uses, but google image search is bloody useless.

>>7815908
Funnily it's not even just "you faggots" its nearly everyone aware of AIs existence
In like 2 years, AIjeets and tech autists have turned out to be such a fucking nuisance just by existing that people got pavloved into associating their machine vomit with scams, copyright infringement, corpo dickriding and bootlegging. It wasn't just artists who popularised the term "slop" to such an extent.

aijeets will never have an eye for aesthetic, their entire """"""""""career""""""""""
is simply typing words related to the most vague idea of what they want to be output, and hit redo if something is extremely off (and they normally miss a bunch of things others see anyway)

>>7814611
When it's a meme or low quality porn, sure. Good artists aren't going to be out of jobs since people will still pay for a higher quality product
But they're outsourcing EVERYTHING to AI and it's fucking dogshit

>>7816042
Cope, I post my AI drawings in artistic discord servers and never been caught

>>7816347
nobody cares enough to examine your dogshit past a glance, congrats! and it's safe to say since you're an aijeet, anything you would have made yourself would be even shittier and also ignored

>>7814622
>construction fags won
...an opportunity to turn their hobby into a 9-5 wagecuckoldry

>>7816350
Lol so now artists can't say in a glance? Not so powerful huh

>>7816369
Not him but what, your point makes no sense at all

>>7816389
You niggas just need to admit that not every AI art is obvious, see >>7815663 this fooled thousands
Some people act like they have superpowers to tell "oh this is AI trust me"

>>7816397
Most people who think that only know the generic chatgpt ghibli art or the overly detailed and rendered base SD models.
There are thousands of AI twitter accounts that have tens or hundreds of thousands of followers and make a bunch of money and nobody can tell.
They still think there is an "AI look" when the whole point is that there are models for every artstyle and artist now.

ai discussion needs to be banned on this board, it just becomes a shit flinging (pun intended) competition were no one accepts the fact that artists can use ai better than some slopper prompting. It would take a week for an artists to master ai and apply it in a way sloppers only dream of. It's not a competition, it's not over for artists, its a grift for a new technology which is still complete junk, hence why top artists aren't using it.

seriously ai sloppers, address this point, you conveniently ignore it and say your art is indistinguishable saar, and we make thousands of dollars saar. if this is true, and you can do this, why wouldnt artists be able to as well? Really its a gold rush, sell shovels for these indians to fling shit with.

>>7816397
>>7816414
Why though do you AIbros need to go to the artwork board to bitch about AI which is so successful and foolproof and looks so good and everyone loves it
Why as an advanced AIchad do you dwell here talking to people who have a desire to chisel out art themselves if it seems to have nothing to do with you

>>7816423
>AIbros
You idiots are more annyoing than the actual AI slop makers. You will not shut up about it and witch hunt all day.

>>7816425
Sorry, meant to say saarjeets or slop generators
>>7816420
This btw

>>7816420
the problem is that jeets will flood the internet (and irl too, apparently) with their dogshit no matter what, so the world is just a worse place now

>>7815718
> ;)
Such obvious bait.
But if I play along for a bit, it doesn't matter if the end result is good, if people don't like how the sausage is made, they have a right to be informed of that and make an educated purchase. To not do so, is essentially scamming people
So yes, it is totally reasonable to like a piece of work, and then retroactively hate it once you find out it is AI, in the same way you can retroactively hate a piece of clothing you previously loved, because you found out it was made via slave labour.
But you're probably Indian and therefore see nothing wrong with scamming people, so why am I even trying to discuss this with you?

>>7814611
you're not wrong but i'd still drown you in a shallow puddle for being an annoying faget

>aitards so desperate for epic trolls they're samefagging their own bait because no one's taking it

>>7816423
I'm not AIbro, i just don't hate AI and think sometimes AI makes good stuff, you forget that it was made to copy artists so it's normal it will get better and better at copying with time
Not every AI is obvious, some are fooling people out right now

>>7814611
I WILL NOT PAY MONEY TO CONSUME THE EQUIVALENT OF A CURATED SET OF GOOGLE IMAGE SEARCH RESULTSPROMPTED BY SOME THIRD WORLD FAGGOT FUCK WHO SHITS WHERE HE EATS AND LITTERS THE GROUND WITH TRASH EVERY STEP HE TAKES. I WANT TO SEE THE SWEAT AND SOUL IN THE ART AND EXPERIENCE THE ARTISTS' JOURNEY VICARIOUSLY EVEN IF IT FUCKING SUCKS YOU FUCKING FAGGOT.

THIS IS WAR
THIS IS WAR
THIS IS WAR
THIS IS WAR

I didn't know community notes could get removed

>>7814611
there is no problem people are just being racist to our fellow clankers

>>7815943
Starting out on social media at this point is a shitshow no matter what if you are already at a certain skill level. People just assume you are using AI because everyone expects you to be terminally online and post all your work online for the last decade.

File: 2312199012.png (26 KB, 516x131)

26 KB PNG

>>7815718
Just gave up in even trying to hide it.

>>7815697
getting it to stay put and generate what you need is actually one of the harder things to do, even if you use masking tools to help it generate things more clearly. it's almost entirely random even if you hone it in enough, and it will just change things for no reason, much like what was shown in the coca cola AI animals trailer.

>>7815697
>make corrections
certainly didn't happen with the coca cola commercial
no they're trying to see how much they can get away with by cutting corners, not only in art but literally everything because ordinary people are blind and don't pay attention but more are starting to notice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salami_slicing_tactics

File: 1398571984617.png (197 KB, 500x516)

197 KB PNG

>>7815707
Felt good to see an AI tranny getting brutally executed but at the same time it's so fucking depressing, with the mountain of effort it takes to catch just one, it feels like there are 3 more flying under the radar.
By the way if you have doubt about someone being a tracing faggot look for picrel, it's not as telling as AI hair/lighting traces but these rats always default to black & white gym shorts with their uninspired gens.

>>7817618
you think that artist is using AI too?

>>7814611
no one hires tracers

>>7814588
kill that fucking jap bitch
why didn’t he die instead of matsumoto

File: file.png (245 KB, 583x885)

245 KB PNG

>>7814611
I don't get why people got butthurt about it either

File: 139581098415.png (727 KB, 822x724)

727 KB PNG

>>7817640
Beyond a shadow of a doubt. He's being relatively subtle about it but it's very blatant in some pieces, you can pinpoint the exact point in 2023 when he started doing it in his timeline. But really I just picked whatever picture from my seethe list, I could give you several more examples of AI sloppers tracing some variant of these pants. Put on your sceptic hat if you spot the gym shorts.

>>7817684
>that picrel
Haha, that really is a nightmarish and ghoulish thing.
It's similar to how they had that hologram concert with tupac - just let the dead be dead.

>>7814611
give us photos of your family. we will use AI to make videos of your family shtting each other face.

File: giphy.gif (947 KB, 500x375)

947 KB GIF

>>7814588
Yes, but the AI pajeets will say "no" to confuse you.

>>7814588
Yes, mainly because all the mediocre AI-generated crap comes from India.

>>7817710
In Russia they made a whole business offering AI generated farewell videos to families of killed soldiers lol
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ZRtahbaNPsA

>>7817761
Why on earth did they choose to put all of them in front of the gates of heaven!?
Might as well had the grim reaper sharpening his scythe in the bloody background...

I feel like those who think this is a good, or tasteful thing, are a very different breed from me and others who are repulsed by this crap.
I wonder what the split of the population, for those who find this charming, and those that hate this, would be?

>>7815296
> handwritten literature
If that was a thing, I'm sure there would be proompters willing to write down stuff from their chatgpt sessions onto the paper.

>>7814622
> 3D model crutch fags
Is it morally wrong if I model scene in Blender and then paint over the lineart render of it in Krita?

>>7817784
wouldn’t you have to kinda design the scene in 2D first to know what you’re gonna do in blender? feels backwards.

>>7817810
I don't have any drawing background, I started from game mapping and moved to 3d modelling in Blender and now I want to get some painting skills to paint textures. Normally I would do that in Blender itself, but manually "rendering" over exported lineart also seemed like nice exercise. I also want to learn drawing some basic little details like stones and cavities, but in terms of bigger or more complex stuff, it seems way easier for me just to model it in 3d. I focus on environments and environmental props, not doing characters.

>>7817810
>he cannot visualize

>>7815663
no it doesn't retarded nigger faggot with ass aids
>but look goycattle like it!
SHOCKER

>>7816397
>>7815718
You're just as fucking retarded as the ones who fell for it. Aitranny

>>7817693
AN easy tell is gym shorts + tanktop, bunny suit or bikini in general for characters that usually wear very specific outfits. Since they can easily just put every character into them instead of original outfits.
But hundreds of thousands of people still fall for it or don't care for some reason.
I forgot that name, but there is a big AI account who just posts characters in the same bikini and bunny outfit and same post over and over and makes tens of thousands of bucks a month.

>>7815943
hwo about don't make shit that look like AI lol
its the same case with any big technological leap, the slop affects fanarts trannies and coomers the most so I personally dont lose my sleep over this kek

>>7816414
>SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR MR AI GRATEFUL HAVE THOUSANDS ARTISTS EASY GENERATOR I SIT HERE TO TELL YOU I MAKE BIG MONEY SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR

>>7815707
It often looks bad, but most idiots often can also just not tell. There a a bunch of accouns that are very clearly AI with tons of mistakes on the character and background etc. and nobody can tell because most people just want to jerk off and scroll past/look at it on their small smartphone screens for 3 seconds.

File: aa30d26c3a3a1302b231d2f7f(...).jpg (100 KB, 1024x1024)

100 KB JPG

https://x.com/mukurout/media
People straight up don't give a shit if it's AI at this point. This guy never even mentioned AI in his bio until someone pointed it out on one of this posts a few months ago and it still didn't affect him at all. Gooners and social media addicts are another breed.
People also make exception for some reason when it's "ai assisted" aka they added some text and noise filter

>>7817883
Exactly. AI sucks, but it's not much worse than 95% of art out there. Everything is just the same 1-2 trends every week, the same currently popular anime/gacha character in generic outfit or trend hopping outfit, random meme redrwa like the retarded frieren lately.

>>7817887
why do you bothe answering i was just venting some frustration

>>7817884
>tasteless fanart coomer tranny
>"artist"
really helping your case here AIjeet

The only thing worse than AI are AI redraws. I'm so tired of
>tehee guys i did a redraw of trending ai image #NOTAI!!!

>>7817891
>jeet
>jeet
>jeet
So original. Say the line Bart!

>>7817906
We are not the same, Kumar.

>>7817913
Thank god

>>7817906
if you support AI you're either a real jeet or a spiritual one, pick which one is worse
>SAAAAAAAAAAAR DONT EXPOSE ME AI YOU HURT MY IZZAT SAAAAAAAAAAR

I’m now realizing Spotify is flooded with ai music and this realization came to me when every track I listened to in some album had an inhale sound at the start of the song which came off unnatural and strange. It should have been much more obvious with the ai album covers. Now I gotta purge my likes.

>>7817948
it's what you get for listening to modern slop

>>7817950
This is so grim. I guess this just means I have to be a little bit more active in vetting who’s a human musician and not blindly listen to recs now.

>>7817857
>>7817858
Gigacope

>>7817864
>Bunnysuits
I'm fucked then since I love bunnysuits

>>7817884
Won't even lie, this is one of the few AIfags I kinda liked, feels like some coomer with a cast of OCs he likes to mess with and AI just happened to be one method.

File: 1763071240273389.jpg (19 KB, 210x240)

19 KB JPG

>>7815718
Notice how these Dalits defend the very art of scamming

File: 1556151921773.jpg (57 KB, 377x423)

57 KB JPG

>>7817684
>your mom just gave your informations to a bunch of pajeets

>>7819568
If governments have their way, we'll all have to do that just to shit post on this shit site.
Fuck this shit world.

File: ai.jpg (302 KB, 607x727)

302 KB JPG

>>7814766
But tagging my work as AI invites toxic comments!

>>7823016
Hey, they still had the moral sense to notify people that they're using AI.

>>7823016
>There's a dedicated disclaimer section at the end of my comm sheet
>trust me bro
lol

>>7823029
They did add it after people mentioned it

>>7823031
>after people mentioned it
LMAO