What is your thoughts on this barmaid commission I had done by Dennis Fröhlich?
whos gonna tell him
>OP posts image that look like ai slop>turns out the artist has been drawing like this for over 10 yearsYou got me again. Are you happy now?
>>7826652Pretty sure AI was trained on Frohlich.
>>7826652must feel bad. you are not an ai slop producer. unfortunately due to ai art everyone thinks your entire portfolio is fake.
>>7826652Another case of people not knowing what ai gens actually look like, which they can't because there is almost no "ai look" at this point considering how many thousands of artist and artsyle loras there are now.People are too used to the generic gpt or dalle look from years ago.
is the face a photo pasted in?
>>7826710I asked him to trace the photo of a model I gave him.
>>7826735>>7826710Also his style is highly detailed faces
>>7826581The barmaid's face, aside from appearing to have been photobashed, looks like that of a present-day model wearing makeup and eyelash extensions. For that reason, it looks inauthentic.
This is so boring to look at. I really cant stand pretty girl (tm) art in almost any capacity.
It would look good if the eyes weren't so soulless. Her makeup and face look very "modern" in general which clashes with the more medieval vibe of the rest of the work. It reminds me of the "this face has seen an iphone" meme from xitter
who the fuck has an apple with beer
>>7826879people who like apples
>>7826581Shittly made AI/photobash paintover. Amateurish composition, and no attention given to brush stroke economy. I hope you didn't pay more than 20$ for this
What's the point of the thread? We got another one with a purple witch too.Are you not happy with the results?
Seeking validation on ic will usually bring the opposite OP
>>7826581>Spend all your effort on the face so she looks like your fap girl>do a rushed weak job on everything else to just get it done lel
>>7826581Man just use AI if you're going to pay for generic blonde bimbo in generic medieval clothesThis kind of art looks like the one a beauty shop commissions to the local crackhead to decorate her shop window
Why do you post the D&D stuff you commissioned like it's an accomplishment of yours, and why can't you keep it to one thread? And to answer the question, it's technically adequate, artistically boring, just like all the others you've posted.
was playing 'the roottrees are dead' and had the same thought about that games art
>>7827374>artistically boringYou mean concept wise?
>>7826581The image has several telltale signs that point toward AI generation rather than a traditional painting or a photograph. The textures have that softly blended, slightly airbrushed look where materials like fabric, wood, and skin all share a similar smoothness instead of distinct physical properties. Details that should show wear or irregularity, like the mug engravings, the tray, or the folds in the dress, feel oddly perfect yet vague at the same time.The lighting also behaves in a way that looks painterly but inconsistent. The firelight, window light, and ambient room light don’t fully agree on where shadows should fall, which is common in AI images that simulate atmosphere more than physical accuracy. Small anatomical cues reinforce this too, such as the hands and fingers feeling just slightly “off” in proportion and articulation, without being obviously wrong at first glance.Stylistically, it sits squarely in a very popular AI fantasy tavern aesthetic that models tend to reproduce: idealized medieval setting, cinematic warmth, highly polished character, and a kind of generic realism that doesn’t quite belong to any specific art tradition. It looks finished, but not intentional in the way a human artist’s brush choices usually are.All of that together makes it overwhelmingly likely to be AI-generated rather than a photograph or a hand-painted illustration.
>>7826701>at this point considering how many thousands of artist and artsyle loras there are now.nah, you can still tell if you arent a retard. that is like 1% of the earth though. i only get fooled when glancing
>>7826663>>7826660the only surefire way to tell if someone is a slopper is to look through their entire portfolio and judge based on the sum of their work. AI sloppers will naturally have way too many art pieces. OP's photo would have taken a real artist around a month to make, assuming they had a real 9-to-5 job and a family, perhaps other commissioners. if they have hundreds of photos like this, you know they're a slopper.
>>7827856Everything.
>>7828507Well does it work for basic barmaid NPC art?
>>7828971You don't need art for d&d unless you've got aphantasia.
>>7828990It still helps though.
>>7826860You think she's pretty?
>>7826581somehow more slop than AI
>>7826581Why is some dumb bimbo standing there and staring vacantly into spaceYour painting just pisses me off
>>7829178this
>>7826581imagine paying someone just to put them through a humiliation ritual anon it’s like wheeling out your trophy wife so everyone can remind you it’s only your turn
>>7826581the guy's art isn't even THAT badthe problem is he keeps accepting commissions from tasteless faggots like OP who just want their gay boring 0 personality having OC donut steel drawn
>>>7826581>be me, level 32 coomer paladin >finally save up 800 freedom dollars after 6 months of skipping tendies >hire Dennis “Hyperrealism” Fröhlich to paint my dream barmaid waifu >send him 47 pics of some onlyfans chick who wouldn’t spit on me if i was on fire >tell him “just trace the face bro, make her look breedable” >3 weeks later barmaid.jpg arrives >she’s perfect >10/10 would let her overcharge me for mead >can practically smell the pumpkin spice through the screen >time to flex on the poorfags >attach Barmaid.jpg >hit post >refresh >thread already calling it AI slop and generic waifu in the same breath >mfw the barmaid still won’t look me in the eye >ngmi >still fapping to it tho
>>7826581Honestly pretty boring
>>7826581can someone give op some examples of non generic art before he ropes
OP dont kill yourself
>>7826581too much coomer shit here is noncoomer version.
>>7829487wtf anon she litcherarry look underage wtf man you p*df file
>>7829487so women aren't allowed to have breasts?kys tranny
>>7829367Tht's the opposite of an having OC donut steel though. NPC character art.
>>7829376models make good references for character art like barmaids etc. sue me
>>7826581The tray is weightless. It floats in her hand, and she stands ramrod straight rather than tilt back slightly to balance the load.
>>7829521>>7829630Making people seethe is my favorite pass time. Thanks.
Apparently lefties dont like this type of art.
>>7826581The reason her face doesn’t match the background is because it looks like a heavily made up girl from porn ads. It should have referenced medieval shows more instead of a random model
>>7830442She's a sexy barmaid serving you beer. What's not to like?
>>7830133>i merely pretended to be a retarded faggot
>>7830133>obvious funpost>"ur seething"do i need to put a /s after every very obvious non-serious post?
OP wishes he was able to write instructions to get his guy to paint realistic medieval bitches
>>7830830why is this face more interesting than picrel?
>>7830830It's fantasy though the barmaids face can look modern attractive
>>7830848lighting
>>7826992Well I got her number, how do you like them apples?
>>7831011You can commission whatever anachronism the you want, it will just suck.Also not surprised you're completely clueless about what makes fantasy appealing.
>>7826581Why waste your money on this?Why not just draw it yourself?What's wrong with you???
>>7832393I can't draw.
>>7827911>OP's photo would have taken a real artist around a month to makeROFL. Tell me you are a slow beginner, without telling me that.
>>7833381depends how much is on the artists plate, but yeah usually about a month, but they are usually doing multiple commissions at the same time tho
>>7829445lol
>>7826581prebeg
Why are normalfags/non-artists obsessed with "full body" illusts? 99% of the time the artist isn't even allowed to put the character in a fun pose/use foreshortening and such, it results in a stiff boring mannequin and the composition is always bad. Yet normaloids scoff at portraits and want to pay for garbage instead. Is it the perception that a portrait/bust up is somehow low effort/easy to make?Anyway, I hate non-artfags, thanks
>>7834488>Is it the perception that a portrait/bust up is somehow low effort/easy to make?No? It's because the retards want to see the entire character and believe full body illusts are better for that purpose.
>>7826652lol, they could still just photobash and put a few patchy strokes on top of a magic erased photo and try to pass it off as a referenced painting, which would even be generous for what it actually likely is.
>>7832188IDK fantasy especially a cute barmaid makes sense to have anachronisms
>>7836948Thing is, she looks like trash.Check picrel. Anachronistic as fuck, but at least looks cute and has a fantasy vibe.Also not a lame ass manequin. How is your roasty supposed to be cute with the posture of a senior citizen.
>>7834243A well versed artist can draw something like this in less than a day. Of course it didn't take them a full month of drawing in order to finish a simple artwork like this one.
>>7837159This pose is just as retarded as the one OP posted. OPs might be more boring, sure, but the one you posted makes literally less sense. It looks forced and cringe to the extent that OP's looks better. Which is an achievement in itself lol.What you posted is pure slop.
>>7826581Worse than ai, this guy has npc brain
>>7837293hmm
>>7837296Sure thing, pucktard.
>>7826581This is probably the shittiest, most boring commission I've ever seen. DA fags have more sovl than this garbage
Would you fuck this barmaid?
>>7837856What's an exciting commission then?
>>7837856What do you have against barmaids?
>>7827911Frohlich most likely was used to train ai
>>7839450Nothing, but your roasty doesn't look like a barmaid, but like stacy wearing her grandma's worst dress.Everything but the traced face looks trash and the former looks like it belongs in her rich dad's SUV and not a fantasy world.
>>7826581>puckee postingLolLmao even
>>7839662You don't like attractive women?
>>7839910Get a new fallacy, puckltard.
>>7840578>Liking attractive women is a fallacyLmao this fucking guy
>>7840728But you're a faggot, puck?
>>7840785No, you are.
>>7840798Seems like I hit a nerve. Let's hope your Redditpals don't find out about your homophobia, faggot.
Puckee posts on /ic/ too?
You know her bush probably looks something like this.
>>7826581>>7837159Only way to know is to draw them shitting
>>7826581I don't like it, but I'm not easily able to express why.
