Is this not the tightest shit you've ever seen?
Jace, every time you post one of these it looks worse. Please, for the love of god, do some self reflection.
>>7830232there's a gaudy quality to it. But I like the clouds, the wings, and the rock.
>>7830232It's not very tasteful
>>7830232how uninspired
>>7830232That seems like pillow shading together plus girl being completely separate from wings and background. It's shit.
>>7830232the red shading on the upper side of her arm looks like sunburn. would look nicer if you shaded her according to the environment like the OG, with sky light casting on her.
>>7830295he's doing the Miyazaki thing where the hair bristles and floats up when someone's angry lol
It's inferior to the original in many ways like most parodies but if you did this all without photobashing, I'm impressed.
>>7830232Shading doesn't make much sense, unless the angel girl is standing in a source of light from the front left, and the sky&sea are painted onto a wall.
I'm no longer 16, but I congratulate you on a formative moment in your journey
>>7830232>thing man>but now thing womanincredible
This thread went ALMOST exactly how I thought it went but it's clearly just one guy this time. I think you guys are out of resources. This might actually just be trump himself.
je suis Trump !
>>7830232her right foot looks like horse hoove
>>7830232It's literally just a goon-ified version of >>7830295.
I feel like this is the kind of sub-pseud kitsch that trump would actually like
I mean this will be my last reply to this because again, it went exactly how I thought it would. You people are so fucking stupid. You are still spending money on this. We all already know this is all fake. I'm not the one wasting money on harassing an innocent person.As for my skillz, you just confirmed them. These replies are just opposite day. You took all the extreme positives of this piece and tried to tear them down. Because you always do the opposite of what I do. So saying shit like "goonified version" actually means "Extremely classy" and "I like everything from the original and hate the new parts' is just saying "The original is ok but the new stuff is even better than the original".It's hilarious that you're still spending money on this and will until the bitter end. If I wasn't a threat to you, then this kind of stuff wouldn't be happening. You are scared shitless and this thread confirms it.
>>7830664I would love to draw such stuff for money
>>7830674your last reply... unless? what meds are you currently on? possibly need dosage adjustment. I've known you since the early CA days, I hope you are getting help.
>>7830232anon, elasticity isn't judged on sight, but touch.i dont know if she's tight, but her posture and lack of clothing makes me think she's actually a loose goose, if you catch my drift
>>7830232I think this could actually be good if someone else did it
>>7830232It's good to have pride in your work, but your post has a lot of "I'm in my 20s and I'm so talented for my age, I'm such a rock star" precociousness. Yeah you do have a good technical grasp, but not a great one. The original work you've based this on is exceptionally well-rendered and the composition is much better and far more intentional with the design and color choices. I don't want to be mean, but you need to be knocked down from your attitude. It is not the tightest shit I've ever seen. It's truck stop T-shirt tier edgy.Technical errors:-Jawline isn't delineated in the face so the shape of the head looks flat and round simultaneously. -Boobs are too spaced out for the internal rotation of her arms; they should be pressed together-As others have pointed out the shading is uneven so the casting of shadows looks chaotic-Proportions and body fat displacement are off; arms look way more muscular than the legs-No visible muscle flexion when that's one of the stand-out qualities of the original; pose is awkwardly modified to show her bush instead (which I'm all for drawing coomer shit, just don't shoe-horn modern horny sensibilities into something with a very deliberate tasteful design)-The shadows on distant background objects are rendered more blueish on the original which is more consistent with the skyBad/lazy design choices:-Earring is stupid; wouldn't make sense for Lucifer to be wearing modern Judeo-Christian iconography, but I don't know if this is supposed to be fem-Lucifer or a whole other character.-I like the rendering on the shoes but they seem like a lazy design choice. It just seems like you'd rather black out the areas of her body you don't care to render/hide them in shadows.-Excluding the angels tells me that you thought it was either too much work or you didn't have an idea of how to adapt them to your vision.That said I do think you still have potential.
>>7833550He is 35-40+. Worked on the sims 3
>>7833550I think your critique is spot on. However it seems the artist has left this thread.
>>7833550>Judeo-ChristianThe Cross is a Christian symbol. "Judeo-Christian" is goyslop propaganda for gullible Christians, but let's leave that for /pol/.
>>7833729Basically any church is Judeo-Christian; Jesus specifically cautioned people against statehood/priests. Probably wouldn't have wanted people worshipping his execution bed so really any icon that isn't a chi-ro is probably zogslop.
>>7830232Rendered like a math textbook
