[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: G47zjujboAAjfxI.jpg (357 KB, 1500x500)
357 KB
357 KB JPG
there are a ton of very interesting artists out there who have styles that would be more respected if they put their stuff in galleries.
>>
translation: I think there's an authoritative body qualified to decide what is and isn't art, and it's only through them and being in a gallery that something becomes art
>>
>>7840102
part of my point is that you wont be remembered if you are just a digital artist. traditional places you within the physical world and if you get into a gallery it guarantees that people who really appreciate art will see and remember your work (granted it is good or striking enough). digital art is at the mercy of algorithms and brainrotted doomscrollers. your art becomes content on the internet. bring it into the real world if you want people to respect your artistry
>>
File: 44444444.png (2.29 MB, 2246x870)
2.29 MB
2.29 MB PNG
>>7840105
I see your point about the physicality of it and the algorithm
I'm not really in tune with that kind of art space, but maybe the difference between digital and trad is that with trad, there's an inherent quality where you know it went through certain processes which gives it an appeal lacking in digital, ie you can admire the quality of the brushwork and know that there's no real trickery like with color grading, ajustment layers, filters in post etc. what's a digital artist gonna do, just print off their work onto a piece of printer paper and hang it in a gallery? hope that makes sense
idk man. maybe I'm optimistic but I feel like the good stuff will always rise to the top, or at least have a sizable audience relative to its quality
one other thing to maybe consider is the availability of art. there's a good chance I'd have never heard of 99% of the artists I enjoy if not for the internet, much less be able to view all of their work. even for older artists like Heinrich Kley, it'd be one hell of an effort to find all of his work IRL
for what it's worth, I actually saved a load of art from that guy about 2 weeks ago. in a way he's in my own little curated digital museum
>>
>>7840093
you give digital artists too much credit, if you think they would be anywhere close to as good without their hands being held by a computer program
>>
>>7840353
you don't draw sharty retard
>>
>>7840093
galleries are just spaces for trust fund kids to party and balding jewish creeps to try to get laid and launder money
>>
I’m 31 years old and have never seen the inside (or outside) of an art gallery. They might as well be unicorns
>>
yet another retard that thinks they have all the answers



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.