[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
▼ Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique
Return Catalog Bottom Refresh
Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.
[Advertise on 4chan]
[Return] [Catalog] [Bottom]
Anonymous Archived
01/09/26(Fri)14:19:10 No.7853529
File: 1743939418912552.jpg (31 KB, 320x180)
31 KB
31 KB JPG
Anonymous 01/09/26(Fri)14:19:10 No.7853529 Archived
Is this what Sargent meant by drawing with 3 values, one value for the light, another for the shadow and a few dark marks for the accents. With an optional gradient for the light. Is this all it takes to make something that looks realistic besides the usual drawing fundamentals?
>>
Anonymous
01/11/26(Sun)11:36:02 No.7855082
Anonymous 01/11/26(Sun)11:36:02 No.7855082
>>7853529
>picrel
I hate how he tried to imitate the humor of the one who teaches watercolor
>>
Anonymous
01/11/26(Sun)11:58:07 No.7855096
Anonymous 01/11/26(Sun)11:58:07 No.7855096
>>7853529
Sargent’s paintings suck. The hype was all fake. It’s just to manipulate prices.
[Return] [Catalog] [Top]
Post a Reply
Return Catalog Top Refresh
[Advertise on 4chan]
Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.