[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 908475075.jpg (362 KB, 950x882)
362 KB
362 KB JPG
why do people struggle with this angle?
>>
>>7857274
you're like a month late dude
>>
File: foot job.jpg (583 KB, 2736x1792)
583 KB
583 KB JPG
>>7857274
it's naturally unappealing and awkward and it's especially hard to render with line art.
There are other shapes that are as awkward to me, like the foot extended forward seen from the back without a shoe, especially if tippy toeing on the ground, whether in photos or drawings it doesn't matter.
>>
most people suck at foreshortening in general. And if you have to ask then you probably also suck at foreshortening
>>
>>7857274
whats wrong with the bottom right? from the pic i see in the top right it doesn't look like a bad way to interpret that angle.
>>
You don't get to draw it very often.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.