I recently started recording my work process because people think my work is made with AI. https://www.youtube.com/@Nicu-%C8%98tefan-CristianAm I the one who has that problem?https://www.deviantart.com/nicu-stefan-cristian
>>7862823sloppy abstract stuff looks like early AI art. the AI slop machine made art like that pretty much worthless. stop drawing sloppy abstract stuff if you don't want people to confuse it for AI or get good enough so that it actually looks intentionally designed and curated art.
>>7862823'sup mongol! hows your game going? I have had a few accusations, but did have timelapses of a sort since my painting process often involves using new layers for experiments and refinement rather than using undo, so by the end of it I might have quite a few layers I can switch through showing the evolution of the work.
>>7862823> By all means, friend! The source file with layers is available on the Patreon
>>7862823>Am I the one who has that problem?no far too many people get accused of thisonly assholes care if its ai or not and only absolute malicious scumbags try to cancel people based on a *suspicion* that a person *might* have used something *they* consider "bad" you can recond one or two videos to prove your skillz but anything beyond it pointless since these people are just crazy idiots on a stupid witch hunt.
>>7862823i have the physical drawing cause 90% of my art is traditional and it's too small for me to bother tracing.>>7862865>only assholes care if its ai or notI don't hate AI but I do hate dishonesty. It's like plagiarism and tracing, no one will crucify you for being honest about where you got your ideas but everyone treat you like scum if you take text from others without source and pretend it's all your own work. this was the norm prior to AI, I ain't making a double standard now for them specifically. AI users should just admit they use it, there's a big enough community not bother pretending you didn't gen it.
>>7862878>this was the norm prior to AIAnd it still is? dont fall for the AI scare anon.>AI users should just admit they use itThey do? The ones that dont exist but they are foolish losers.
>>7862823Just don't let it get to you. Post one example showing your work method, and whenever someone says anything about your work being AI, just post them back to that example, if they keep posting about AI, mute/block them unceremoniously.You've already gone out of your way to make art, and post it for them to see, and if they're going to DEMAND more of your time so that your art may meet their BS standards - fuck 'em.More still, I think many are unwilling to admit when they call it wrong, because that means they were being massive immoral cunts, and unlike most artist on this board, I think most arty people (creators and audience) tend to get high on how righteous they are.So post link to work method and block. Done.
>>7862881>AI users should just admit they use it>They do? The ones that dont exist but they are foolish losers.Nah, most don't. They may admit it if asked, but most don't indicate that they were using it. It's (to me, anyway) a fairly rude thing to ask, and by not letting people know before hand, you're allowing people to misunderstand that it was made with talent, and by only admitting it in the comments of singular pieces, you're allowing these misunderstanding to build.I'm actually fairly appreciative of AI creators who state outright in their bios that they use AI - I may not like their art, but at least they understand the current landscape and are doing what's appropriate by giving people a heads up.
>>7862888>Nah, most don't. how do you know? from my experience most do. have you counted every person on the planet that posted AI gend stuff and did the math to figure out that "most dont"? or were you baited by social media like 4chan or twitter into believing some made up bullshit? i didnt do the math but its most likely the former do you not agree?i only use pixiv and twitters chronological feeds and i only encounter AI scammers when its something relating to politics or money
>>7862895>how do you know? from my experience most do.And how do YOU know? Because from MY experience, most don't.If you're going to come out swinging against people's anecdotal experience, don't use your own anecdotal experience as the retort.As for the extent of my anecdotal experience, every time I come across someone posting AI art, I take note of whether or not they say anything about; On the actual postings? Basically never. In their bios? Rarely.Is this any form of conclusive evidence? Nope.Am I going to keep saying it anyway? Yep.As for where I'm encountering AI images, like you, it's twitter.
>>7862823Just show psd or record one drawing would be enough.
>>7862823this is the average AI Accuser btw
>the eyelashes are THAT inconsistent Nah, it checks out
You don’t feed the trolls. No amount of evidence will convince them they were wrong. Trying to defend yourself will only make it worse because more retards will join the discussion.You know you don’t use AI. If someone thinks you do, that’s their problem.
>>7862823the best thing you can do for AI accusations is to just tell the truth: say you aren't. you don't need to "prove" anything with timelapse videos (AI fakes those too). your art will appear human made once you get a large and consistent portfolio over a long period of time.AI sloppers will generate images from any art style, with no continuity between images, and they will generate a hundred images per day, so if you're consistently putting out 1 full illustration per week, attentive observers can just cross reference your output with how long you have been drawing.
>>7863076Modern day "trolling" is just harassment and most trolls are unironical nutjobs.Doesn't matter what you do or don't do, you always lose.
>>7863076Yeah but you can get ruined by some accusation Check this nigga https://x.com/fuckAI_0, he accuses a bunch of people EVERYDAY, probably some real artist will get eventually accused and ruined because of his "credibility"
>>7862843Average pjeet in the ganges
>>78628232018"The time will come when reality will be doubted and questioned because of AI"2026"AI did it"
>>7863116What are you going to do about it? Play the witch in their little witch hunt? Sue them for slander and defamation? You ignore it and do nothing.
>>7863118Yeah, it was a dtiys thread and the photo was a pajeet in the Ganges or something.
My art is too shit to be accused of AI so if that happens I'd probably feel both good and bad.
Tell them they couldn't smell what the Rock is cooking even if he was actively DDT'ing that retard through a table from the top of the cage during hell in a cell and just post my vod
>>7863152IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU ACCUSE ME OF AI
>>7862823I'm not popular enough for people to care.
>>7862823It's pointless, even if you have all the proof in the world, some jealous 150k follower faggot artist could make up bullshit about you and ruin you forever.Might as well not care and just use AI as a tool to better yourself.
>>7863405>Might as well not care and just use AI as a tool to better yourself.Nice try, turd worlder. You fail this charisma check.
>>7862823weeeelll i checke ur oldest post and that was posted6days ago,, u have 107 pages of poasts, o u hav nyything before 2022??
>>7863622https://web.archive.org/web/20160530075454/http://juststeven.newgrounds.com/art
if they are talking behind your back just fart in their face and keep going
>>7862916>And how do YOU know?i dont but i dont need toread:>>or were you baited by social media like 4chan or twitter into believing some made up bullshit?this is more likely isnt it?>If you're going to come out swinging against people's anecdotal experience, don't use your own anecdotal experience as the retort.ok. 1st of all you claim as if its a fact that AI scammers are as common as water in the ocean i tell you of my experience it disproves it period anecdotal or not irregardless of your experience.think about it for one second before rage posting if my experience differs from your so largely from yours then something is wrong isnt it?where do you see these ai scammers anyway? are you one of these idiots who use "for you" tab or something? do you follow them or what? as i said i only see ai scammers when its some crypto shit or putin/trump propaganda stuff that's it theres this one famous 80s jap boomer artist in my follow list who keeps reposting that slop.>Is this any form of conclusive evidence? Nope.>Am I going to keep saying it anyway? Yep.why? you wanna be a shitty dishonest person just for sake of it? didn't you hate dishonesty?
>>7863043Yes. The average pixel hunter can't conceive that someone would draw eyelet very slightly differently. Must be AI. Ears are too far apart. Must be AI. Slightly wonky anatomy. Must be AI. Torso too long. Must be AI
stream obs, psd, timelapse, all the stuff that's extremely easy for someone that actually did the thing to provide.>but what if it's....a le 3d copyif it looks like garbage it's garbage.
>>7863116https://x.com/fuckAI_0AntiAIbros... our leader has fallen...
>>7865705Accused the wrong witch ey
>>7865705lmao good riddance
>>7865705Lul
>>7862823just ignore itdon't engage with angry mobs. i nall facets of lifethis is knownI'm pretty sure a lot of ai accusations are from pro-ai trolls btw. sometimes you see a few less sophisticated attempts where it's obviousalso, if you start putting value in the process, ai rats will just start using ai to replicate the process. I've already seen some not very convincing attempts at animating the drawing process, complete with hands and all, but it will probably get better
9 times out of 10, when people accuse obvious non-AI art as being "ai slop", it's from prompters trying to goad you into sharing process videos so they can A) use it as learning material for their algorithm and B) use it to fake process videos for actual ai art. don't feed the machine.
