What are your thoughts on people editing other people's art?
>>7872796People should just make their own art.
>>7872796Fine as long as you mention it.
>>7872796ok as long as they have a similar skill level, which OP clearly does not the cloth has no thickness on the edit's edge, and the texture on skin in the cleavage is completely different to the original
>>7872796The Caleb edits are distasteful, fat woman are disgusting and fat saggy tits on fat woman are the worst of the worst
>>7872796edit as you wish, but don't post it online.
evil only corrupts etc.
Edits I am fine with:- constructive criticism (possibly with notes to the artist on how to improve)- when the edit is better than the original- adding cool backgrounds to a 'character in white void'- drawing- making tits bigger- an improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls) Edits I am not fine with:- shit taste- perversion - anything meant to put down the original artist
>>7872796It depends. Most memes are just edits of other's art, and people reuse other's art in plenty of other context, so in a general sense I'm okay with it, and I think most would be too.Then there's edits to make fun of the art or artist, and I think the artist themselves would obviously disapprove of that, and therefore I would as well... so I guess my approval depends on the artists approval.As for AI editing, which I assume is the real meat of the question OP wanted to get to... I'm against it in a general sense, since the artist will likely also be against (since artist are almost universally loath to AI right now), it probably trains the AI on the artists work without their permission, and many have moral considerations against AI at this time so, having an AI edit of someone's work without knowing the artist's feelings on the matter is extremely inconsiderate.
>>7872796if you put it on the internet it's free game there is no way to enforce edit etiquette, so it's a moot point
>>7872796
>>7872898Look at those sheep. that lady must be huge
>>7872796Dick move. Art "fixers" should get the rope. Unless it's to teach.
>>7873018seethe
>>7872904nigga, she's literally wearing shields as bracelets
>>7872844>- an improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls) does this happen...
>>7872844>improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls>replacing men with w*men>improvement of morality
>>7872796subhuman behaviour
>>7873141>behaviour>uguess you would of known about subhumans lol
>>7872796Tale as old as time
>>7873146>would of
>>7872814i mean, for a photoshop job it's ok
Breast edits are fine
I think counterspells are bad game design.Planeswalkers were a mistake and you deserve way more UB than you slop eating pigs in the Nebraska ecosystem can handle.Also tittyedit anon uses AI.
>>7872796depends on the purpose, obviouslyI think it's fine when it's done out of actual appreciation for the original and you're trying to build on top of it and make something coolstuff like making covers of songsmaking edits of filmsediting sprite sheets (I remember spending ages making little characters and scenes out of final fantasy sprites when I was a kid. in paint. if I had aseprite I would have been in heaven)
>>7873146>would of>implying I care about your ooga booga amerimutt way spellingCOLOURARMOURFAVOURITE
>>7873525>OUI OUI HON HONwhat did he mean by this
>>7872796it has its place
>>7873530retarded or just very american?oh wait there's no difference
Can I get more GTS art pls?
>>7872898Original is much better. You cant stop people from making lewd edits anyway
>>7872844>an improvement of morality in the work (e.g removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girls)unfathomably based
i’d hate it so much, probably because the stuff i’ve been making recently feels extremely personal and i care about it a lot, specifically as i feel the subjects are complexly characterized, and people tend to do really bad things with them. kind of like how you wouldn’t want someone to take a quiet, soulful drawing of your waifu and hypersexualize it.>>7872832but this too. i wouldn’t mind at all if they did absolutely anything if they kept it to themselves. but i understand stuff happens, and wouldn’t lash out at anyone no matter what they might do. it’s me who shouldn’t feel this way, because it will happen, like ai grabbing whatever you post, and there's nothing i can do about it, except to try to engage with more interesting, positive things elsewhere rather than tilting at passing windmills.
is Richard Prince's work really transformative?
>>7872796its like fucking the creators girlfriend.not yours.fuck.off.
>>7872844>removing dicks from Futa drawings or redrawing femboys as actual girlsdogshit awful taste
>>7875364>>7875564the duality of man
Making this sort of garbage with Jesper's art should get you whipped
>>7875531>its like fucking the creators girlfriend.
I hate cuck shit so I managed to acquire the skill of race swapping brown/black people to white or, at the very least, sorta orange.
>>7875938how does turning a nigger white make it not cuck shit?
>>7875993use your brain and maybe you'll be able to figure it out
Coomer brained retards that consoooom whale products can’t enjoy Jesper’s fantastical art for what it is because they can only devour and not do anything new. He’s actually an incredible artist and his process of peeling the paint is fascinating
why do you care?
>>7873317It's one of those arms race situations. I think counterspells can be fun as a known quantity where it becomes a game of trying to bait out a counterspell vs trying to feint its use until the perfect moment. I don't know if there's a way to keep the design space small like that while having continuous updates and additions to mechanics. The community has voted in favor of more content at the cost of retarded design
>>7876119kek
>>7872796>>7872898bre of clan stoutarmfrom most recent mtg setartist is jesper ejsinghe also did a lot of work for warcraft/blizzardvery painterly with oils-like digital techniques and great exaggerated/caricature work, james gurney vibes (dinos included)https://jesperejsing.com/for anyone curious>>7875737>>7876103taste can't be taught and these sorts of goon slaves will always exist, unfortunately
>>7876338never mindi'm full of shit, apparently he does this shit in mostly actual oils, sometimes acrylic, but always trad?that just makes it even more impressive desumy point still stands: he's great
as long as its a meme i don't see any reason not to.
>>7877370would
>>7872796I fucking love the MtG booba editsTime honored and peak /tg/ tradition.
unrefined and tasteless aberrations produced by those that have a vision but lack the skills and talent to produce anything without coat-tailing off a real artists' work.
>>7878010Plus now you can just shove it into ai and prompt a huge chest.
>>7876341He does this thing where he blow dries pieces of his paintings off to create contrast. I have no idea why/how
I made this character. This is Ms. Fortune, the female version of Fortune.I combined a random four-leaf clover character I found on the internet with Ms. Pac-Man.
>>7878985The originals.
>>7878495>I have no idea why/howNGMI
>>7872815theyre the best idk what ur on about
>>7872796It kind of depends to me. I say 'depends' but honestly I've never seen it done out of anything but bitterness or "They did it wrong...here's how it SHOULD be!!!" to go further i can't think of an actual, good artist who edits other peoples work. it's always some mid tier or beg stomping down on another beg or showing their lack of understanding for what makes good art (and subsequent bitterness)
>>7872796One should atleast credit the original artist. Even if you hate them, it's not your work.>>7872897Weird how this applies to art where you can just take it and reupload it regardless of the artists premission but if you just take some's writing and use it without credit/source people will cruficy you and try to ruin your career for plagerism. Music is also very reliant on the creator being good willed.
