Is there anything more pathetic lol?
>>7895029>Is there anything more pathetic lol?Yes. This thread, and the anon who made it, for example.
>>7895029you just want our permission to sign your art, don't you anon
>>7895029Don't ever sign your art, once you do that, you will never be free. You will regret it.
>>7895039What the hell does this mean? /x/?
>>7895029How dare someone sign work that they made? What an asshole!>>7895034FPBP
>>7895029This is bait.
>>7895040Your artistic journey encompasses a whole universe of things that you don't even know you will wish to explore one day. And it will drive you crazy not being able to draw whatever you want because you shackled yourself under a pen name, and then deviating from drawing Disney Princesses will destroy your "artistic career". Try to remain free, no string attached, as long as you can. Saving the exception that you can make all of your experimental weird stuff in private without sharing it with anyone at all. That's hard for most people. Not even Frazetta could resist signing his private blacked goon shit. Don't make his same mistake.
theres a compromise, you hide the signature in the art so if a jeet tries to steals your shit, you can still prove its not his. like the marathon tranny hiding loss in his art and the dumb jeets just put it in the game
>>7895055Yeah, we may have never known Frazetta drew those images, that were inside his house, in his sketchbooks, were it not for his signature...You're not making a compelling case here.
>>7895070What I meant was that EVEN Frazetta couldn't resist the ego trip of signing something that he didn't want to be seen or published. Therefore, asking the random beg artist out there to remain anonymous for his own sake is asking too much apparently. But keeping your art anonymous can be a good thing for your skill development if your ego doesn't stop you from trying anything that can pique your interest, like coom, gore, bizarre, scat, furry, or even futa.
>>7895055>that cartoonishly spent 2-foot long cock still erected and dripping teardrop-symbol globs of cum, as his prize flops limp to the floor ravished and defiled>the dude with a gormless sambo face jerking his horse cock so hard he physically levitates from the exertion and falls flat on his as, like some kind of Wile E. Coyote visual gagMan, this old fag was a fuckin' freak. Don't ever let boomer politicians convince you porn addiction is a modern phenomenon. They just knew how to cover up their freak shit a little better.
>>7895105Look at the american King of Orange, he's almost 80, and he's the nastiest motherfucker out there, beyond the imagination of the average user here.They are pretty self-aware of how nasty they were, and they are the ones trying to gaslight new generations about "morals and traditions" lmao, the nerve on these rotten demons
>>7895099>he didn't want to be seen or publishedI believe it was his wife who didn't want this stuff seen. Frazetta thought it was hilarious and loved showing it to friends. His wife was very religious and pushed him to paint over some of his overtly sexual and pornographic art, sometimes as a condition of allowing him to sell it. Frazetta's closest friend, "Doc" Dave Winiewicz, has written about this, because he spent a lot of time at their house and saw (and heard about) the ups and downs of their marriage in person.
>>7895055Does anyone know the story behind this series of drawings? The notes written in the margins give the impression that this was a commission of some kind. Also, I gotta say, although I hate the subject matter, that is some fantastically well-drawn coom.
>>7895167This >>7895164 is what I heard too. It was something he did for this "Doc" Dave friend of his, it seems. But about the rest of the "unseen" stuff he may have been drawings for decades, we will probably never know. I don't think he told his daughter "honey if I die, you can find my erotic secret work tucked in on the leg of my old desk, have fun". lolSame with Kim Jung Gi, we will never see his porn secret work.
>>7895099>that he didn't want to be seen or published.Do you know that for a fact? Are you forgetting the era he drew them in? There's nowhere for something as debauched as that to BE displayed or published, other than the homes of private collectors.
>>7895029These days you should always sign it since for the time being it's kind of shameful to sign AI images and most people don't. If there isn't a signature I usually assume AI gen.
I dont sign my art because its evident that I drew it based on the style and message.
>>7895029I really don't give a shit.
