AI isn't bad; it's a useful tool for artists. I drew this image on the left and made the right image with one sentence. Sure, there are mistakes, but I could just print it out and use it as a framework beneath tracing paper and the blend of ideas. This is quite productive. Anything AI messes up can be fixed with PS or your imagination.
Nobody should be able to draw a picture by just typing a sentence on the computer. Making art already seems like a hopeless waste of time with how talented some people are, but now it's just completely senseless and you will never get noticed in a sea of AI pictures, unless you are one of these rare talented artists.
>>7896655I can tell the right is AI
>>7896658>>7896659I drew the picture on the left in pencil, then inked it and reinked on the computer. Despite the flaws, I like the version on the right better. Again, the ai flaws can be fixed practically or digitally.
>>7896655Honestly I’d rather study something flawed from a human than something accurate from AI. The image on the right is nice but I wouldn’t want to get so comfortable with learning from computer generated images. I feel that it would affect my art in a way that I wouldn’t want.
>>7896661>something accurate from AI>The image on the right is niceOk now the actual trolls entered the thread
>>7896661I think though, that amateur artists like me or even casual designers can greatly benefit from this technology. It could encourage people who otherwise wouldn't show enthusiasm in art to do so.
>>7896662I mean it’s certainly not a bad drawing but it’s not something I’d want to learn from either >>7896665There are better ways to get people to find enthusiasm in art. Coming up with your own style, concepts and ideas without reliance on AI is a good place to start.
>>7896655generic AI sloppacleaning up the slop it spits out is some cuck shitif you think AI looks good, you need to develop your tasteif you need AI for ideas or encouragement, you were never gonna make it anyways
>>7896665Not much more, I think, than just telling them the little secret that using references is totally fine. Photos and 3D models are generally more accurate and can be posed more freely, and you can use them without offloading your entire creative process to a machine.
>>7896655>westoid """""""artists""""" have to resort to using AI because they can't create anything worthwhile to save their livesYou'll never be an artists, you'll never be Asian
>>7896660you are wrong for liking the right one. its disturbing. hate the legs so much. and the expressions.
>>7896655but you didn't draw the right image, nor do you likely have the skill to do so, nor will you even gain those skills by relying on AI like this, so you can't you fix the mistakes that AI makes because you lack those skills.Your art will never stop looking like stiff generic stock art if you're going to take shortcuts like this.
>>7896655Why does ai always make them onions pog
>>7896655Can't summon the gumption to draw such a plain and rudimentary character design in the most basic of dynamic poses?You're not cut out for this. You'll quit no matter what sort of shortcut is made available to you, because you don't understand why you wouldn't want to use such things.Without the love of the act of drawing and the pride of having made something excellent with your own hand, you'll burn out, with some excuse like other people had better genetics than you or some other horseshit.Draw or fuck off. Those are the two options.
>>7896655If you are unable to draw the right on your own, then you use ai as a crutch, not as a tool. I bet 99% of ai sloppers can't copy what AI shits out even half-decently
Those who spend money on art care a lot about the artist and they usually dislike Ai.That's the group you are missing out on if you are known to use Ai. The pro-Ai crowd that hates human art is tiny and there's too much supply considering anyone can use Ai and be an Ai artist.
The joke is: both images are ai.
>>789665590% of professional artist especially those who work on movies and games use ai in thier workflowI encourage everyone to do the same unless they want to be replaced and blacklisted for being a luddite
>>7896777it's closer to 99% sir, I see white timmy artist fired all time, I imported my cousins yesterday and already find job in beautiful america. we are very loyal to AI, the true god of future and technology, we all must adapt and praise
>>7896780good morning! very based
You're a /beg/ so you don't understand its problems. It's frankly useless for making expressive art with an actual viewpoint other than "generically competent", which we see on display here. AI can make something look "not bad" but invariably it lacks personality and is contaminated by the sheer amount of data it's been trained on - if you ask it to do a grungy noir comic book style, it won't actually do this, it will instead give you something like a semi-rendered, glossy polished turd with some deep shadows.I think it's okay at generating reference and have used it for that a couple times. But beyond that, it's just a toy. You're getting wowed by stock art, you motherfucking shitter.
>>7896655About as useful as getting someone else to lift my weights for me. The point is to be able to get jacked art skills anon. Not to gain a crutch.
