Cool it with the antisemitism.

>>7905159
Moloch's cock all sorts of problems. Have you even seen his cock before? Or ANY cock before? His cock looks like that? Who's Urethra looks like that!? It looks more like a tit than it does a urethra. The cock looks more like a sausage than a cock. Where are the veins? The tendons? The definition of the cock's head? Peh!
Also, we all know that Moloch doesn't shave, so why are his balls so smooth, and with not a single wrinkle?
And why is his cock basically coming out of his stomach? A cock doesn't take up more of the crotch the bigger it is, it's hangs off more, much like a breast does.
And speaking of cocks sizes, why did you make Moloch's cock so small? I'm sure we've all seen how massive his cock is, and it would crush a man when flaccid, not rest comfortably between their buttocks.

So 0/10, I would not suck that cock.
I would review the rest of the image, but I was too busy looking at the cock.

File: file.png (885 KB, 839x935)

885 KB PNG

All parts of the body move together and so if you draw a body part it's relationship to the mental state of the character (In this case, excited for his reward) needs to reflect how they hold themselves.

>>7905182
Thanks for the critique anon. You're clearly very skilled

>>7905159
it's good that you're not shying away from/hiding hands. the no effort text / bubbles is pathetic. the whole drawing seems artificially out of aspect ratio, especially the faces- like it's beyond a choice to have skinny figures and into maybe you have a severe astigmatism tier. the animal head is very indistinct, cow snout but then like goblin head or some random shit, why not just go full cattle? the animal head is very flat and lack form. the penis is atomically misplaced to the right (figure's left). the shoulders and right arm of the back figure are also misconstructed, you hide some of the technical failures pretending it's style but it's clear you're not constructing your figures but just shading to cover the inconsistencies and calling it a day. lazing out and just not drawing the rear figure's second leg is another kludge worthy of an ai. the penis lacks form and detail almost like your prudery is coming through and you can't actually stomach your own rebellion despite the cliche subject of your illustration. the shadows are inconsistent and incorrect. go back to basic shadow shade. shading is not a bandaid for poor figure construction, but on top of that you've done it poorly.

3/10 would not /pol/ with

>>7905166
it's uncircumsized, foreskin rolled forward. I think there should be more folds/wrinkles around the opening though.
I agree more veins on the shaft and wrinkles on the balls would be good.

>>7905159
lack of fingernails on the chosen one makes his hands uncannily froglike, was that intentional?

It's REALLY bad.
Looks more like an attempt at genuine porn than a political cartoon/meme