New drawing trend just drop
I'll think I skip this oneit actually requires to know how to draw
>>7909918It's a bit funny how, just from the profile picture and the way he draws eyes, you can tell the guy who made the original post is one of those Disney clone artists. It's always the same eyes and facial construction. Even if someone actually works at Disney, I don't know why they would want to draw in the exact same style so many other people do.Also, this trend just seems a bit uninspired to me. Oh wow, the cartoon character looks weird if you detail them too much. It feels like I've seen thousands of these kinds of drawings since I started using the internet.
>>7909933>I don't know why they would want to draw in the exact same style so many other people doCan we even consider them "Disney clones" when Disney doesn't even put out shows that look like these artists drawings? They seem to be a lost breed.>Even if someone actually works at DisneyDoing what? What 2D cartoons are they putting out in 2026 in said styles? At this point they're their own class of divergent animal.
I'd say he just wants to see a greater variety of styles and is sick of the more graphic flat (somewhat vectorised) style that most animation and a lot of artists are drawing in now.The new trend seems a bit disingenuous, since they're taking the line 'less flat' to mean "Realistic". Like >>7909920 was already not particularly flat, so they just added a bunch of extra details, as if that much much of anything to do with what he was seemingly proposing. Why the realistic cat head for OP's image, when the source image has cartoon eyes as well?Not to say that makes the trend bad, or that the artists are misunderstanding what was said, because it's clearly done in jest, but you can guarantee retards will see the trend and get mad at the guy for daring to voice an innocuous opinion.
That's a good point, you're right that Disney doesn't really do the "Disney Art Style" anymore. Their modern styles all have pretty similar DNA I think, but they really aren't the kind of thing that comes up when you search "Disney art style".It's like, there's this general Idea of a "Disney Art Style", but it's hard to pinpoint, because it morphed and changed through all their films. 101 Dalmatians is not the same as The Little Mermaid, which is not the same as Beauty and the Beast. So when people want to invoke a Disney feeling in their art, they don't really get inspired by specific movies and instead just go for the visual cliches that they have in common. The same eyes and faces and expressions, all the time... Though, I suppose that is how it is with imitating styles in general. You can't really do anything too wacky or original, because you're limited by what has been drawn in the style before.
>>7909942Meant for >>7909937
>>7909918Do twitter artist actually draw anything they want or own ideas, or is it all just current trend and current populary gacha/anime girl?
>>7909984>or is it all just current trend and current populary gacha/anime girl?Depends on whether or not you follow artists who make things other than current trend and current popular gacha/anime girl. If your shit taste makes you follow shit artists who make shit art, don't complain about your shit timeline.
>>7909941You silly silly naive person. These trends only require artists to loosely adhere to them. They're just vehicles for artists to show off to other artists and farm engagement. Why? Because these trends are literally for artists by artists. The overlap between non artist audience and artist audience for these trends varies depending on subject matter, but look at his fucking niche this one is. This is specifically for artists, to stand out among the crowd you gotta excel in either skill, creativity, or appeal. This person has neither creativity or appeal, so they choose technicality.
>>7909920>>7909918
>>7909984>Do social media users actually do anything they want or just chase fame and engagement?>>7910015>The overlap between non artist audience and artist audienceis huge and i mean "normie" tier huge. 250k+ likes on twaater is basically pewdiepie tier engagement.
>>7910036Bold to assume most likes are real in the the great year of our Lord and Savior of two thousand and twenty six.
This "Trend" just proves that people don't know a damn thing. literallly all the replies are drawing in 3D under the red X, they are just too lazy to shade it.
>>7910038likes werent real since forever youngling its still an indicator though
>>7909986I don't see anything on my timeline because it doesn't exist. But everything i do see about it here or anywhere else is just trendhopping, same with tiktok "hobbies" apparently.
>>7909918Consume! Blindly follow! Bandwagon! Copy everyones fake personality and interests!omg y2k anime retro 67
>>7909984>Do twitter artist actually draw anything they want or own ideastwitter artists want to get paidthey are happy drawing nothing but FOTM porn because they get paid
>>7910046>artists actually drawing>getting attention>crab on /ic/ who ISN'T drawing: "GAAYY"
>>7910041Why is everyone here so autistic/visually illiterate? The meme is poking fun at those shitty engagement-bait tutorials that tell you it's wrong to use a simple shape, and that the correct way to draw in a bunch of anatomical detail. So they intentionally add so much detail that it becomes uncanny, for comedic effect. It's not a commentary on "3D-ness" and it's not even meant to be a skill flex.
mitch got draggedwhats wtih these new fucking captchas
>>7910068look at your calendar
>>7910033source?
>>7910033Why does he have tits the side of his head
>>7910075i hate this gay day
>>7910056The original post was in fact a comment on "3D-ness" and not understanding it is the only reason this thread got made.
>>7910111It was not. The shitty course grifter who made the inciting post just prefers biomorphic forms and anatomy to simplified forms. It's the difference between drawing a cone for the leg and the actual muscular forms. He claims to be pro-"construction", but his focus is actually biomorphic detail, and that is what people are running with. A primitive is just a 3D as a complex form, but some people are dumb and think if you use a simpler shape, it's because you don't know how to draw anatomy or something.
>>7909918The cat on the right according to /ic/ is objectively better art as it captures fundamentals in a better way than the left
>>7910068kys
I saw the sonic one first
>>7909941Well >>7909920 was a joke, with the artist applying the changes of a pre-existing reimagining of the original Gundam from last year's 'what if'/multiverse anime Mobile Suit Gundam GQuuuuuuX.
>>7910081Starting Strength GOMAD
