What sort of art speaks to you personally?
I like misogynic art
>>7922071It's hard to narrow it down. It can be a lot of different things. Unique coloring, line work, shading.An interesting story or idea that gets me thinking about stuff I hadn't before. Sometimes it's just drawing a character I really like, in a new way.
>>7922072based
>>7922071The kind with big asses and big titties.
>>7922071sincere art
>>7922116>>7922125very much these
>>7922071my own
>>7922131Cute, I'm gonna steal this
>>7922125Source?
>>7922757https://imgur.com/gallery/JYXit
>>7922125>sincere artwhat makes it sincere?
>>7922071stuff along the lines of this
>>7923086Man this movie is fucking perfect, they even did a great job with the story somehow
i really remember stuff that feels as though the artist really wanted to get it out no matter what (high effort even if not a lot of technical skill) and/or that they're showing you a piece of some delusion they've had for years. compositions that focus on scenes you don't often see (but could plausibly happen) are good too.marlbara ltd's earlier stuff is so good. shame xhe went full schizoid
>>7923087>they even did a great job with the story somehowEh, there's obvious gaping holes in the story, particularly regarding the MC's backstory.Like were the MC and the mechanic orphans or what?Who was the dude who drove the topless car with two ladies that the MC admires so much?And it's implied that MC and his romantic interest hadn't really met or spoken before, but then there's a quick flash back of her happily giving her name to him, so had they met or not?Plus it felt like, with all the times the MC crashed his car, that there was some thematic foreshadowing there that didn't end up paying off.Also the race should have ended after he surpassed his idolised ideal (the topless car driver), and not dragged on for another five minutes against machine man - that's just poor pacing.But still, yeah, a very good film, but obviously it had 20 minutes of cuts that can really be felt. I do find it funny that the villains, the dictators of the planet they're racing on, a really the victims of the story. Who the fuck were the racers or race organisers to force a race on their planet without permission and possibly restart the war? They're literally driving their cars through the equivalent of area 51!Haha, and sorry for the review, I watched fairly recently myself, and can't really talk about it to anyone beyond a single 'it's good' line.
>>7923088>feels as though the artist really wanted to get it out no matter what (high effort even if not a lot of technical skill) I think that quite neatly describes what it means for someone's work to have "soul" or at least a major part of it, and how some artists later works can feel to have less of it despite the higher technical skill. Not that all amateur art is automatically soulful, you can often tell when the artist is just forcing it to hit their weekly quota of works published rather than out of genuine desire to express themselves.Anyway for me it's ink works of various artists from different countries/cultures and time periods.
I want to live in a Hiroshi Nagai painting
>>7922071I think work that tickles my metaphorical pickle the most, is when there's a mix of realism and abstract/graphic/cartoony elements. Like in my picrel, the body could have worked for a completely realistic representation, but then the head has been heavily stylised.Pushing it, it'd be heavily rendered and detailed environments, or detailed clothing, for very cartoony characters. Something like Jamie Hewlet's work (with the environments and clothing contrasting with the characters), or European comics and their Ligne claire style.Boiling it down and putting it simply - I really like a contrast of Simplicity and Complexity.
