Is a pencil-like art style like pic related or Kenji Tsuruta even possible in the first place to emulate digitally?
If english speaking internet users can figure it out, you can bet the Japanese art industry have figured it out decade ago.Or just scan your pencil drawings. That still works
>>7935111No that's why trad is superior.
my kneejerk response to this is "yes, but will it be worth it"
>>7935111Achieving 80% wouldn’t be hard. Find good brushes and high res paper textures and youre good. But 100% so no one could tell, would be nearly impossible to do.
>>7935111>Is a pencil-like art style like pic related or Kenji Tsuruta even possible in the first place to emulate digitally?Yes but its soulless.
>>7935111It's possible, but it takes a lot of fine-tuning. People do okay approximations with tone-like brushes though (or just paint in greyscale)
>>7935111where is her other leg?
>>7935542Shiiieeet, its fucking aislop, Pajeet got us guys
>>7935542good question
>>7935111what is this unreadable mess?
>>7935111what the fuck is happening in the leg area between the two near figures? I've been staring at it for two minutes and still can't tell what I'm looking at, the tangents are killing my brain
>>7935550https://halcyonrealms.com/anime/blade-of-the-immortal-illustration-collection/it doesn't seem to be ai slop, just regular slop
>>7935560>>7935565Obviously must be part of his kimono pattern
>>7935572You're sure it's not some time traveler shit or something?
>>7935576nothing obvious about it, the upper portion is aligned with her hip, roughly sized as her thigh near the knee and has what appears to be an indication of the iliotibial band where his hand reststhe kimono (?) pattern has a sun, but on the leg it's cut in half and has a shadow value triangular element that appears to be showing backgroundit's a mess>b-butredline it
>>7935603>>>/ic/beg/
>>7935598It is a mess. Idk, maybe Samura finished it with AI. He can be somewhat of a renderfag, but I don't blame him. He draws so much you have to give him some slack.
>>7935603lol
>>7935618What?
>>7935640It's short for "laugh out loud"
>>7935542
>>7935642Whats so funny, huh?
>this entire thread Just nuke the site already
>>7935111Is it POSSIBLE? Yes. Is it PRACTICAL? No. It takes extra time and effort to emulate analog in digital. Brushes can take you 70 or 80% of the way there. The rest is putting in the extra work to make it LOOK analog, which is a tricky, time consuming thing.
>>7935542>>7935550>>7935554>>7935560>>7935565>>7935572>>7935576>>7935584>>7935598>>7935617UMMMMM WHERE ARE HER ORGANS SWEETIE?????
>>7935790take the chinese cock out of your mouth before posting
