Now there's a limit placed on users for xitter. Traction will decrease even further and growth willl be harder now that retweets are limited, which screws over artist.
>>7943791Who the fuck posts 50 times a day?
>>7943794Journalists, 3rd world engagement farms, and political rage baiters.
>>7943807Don’t worry, just buy twitter premiu—sorry, X premium (powered by Grok AI) and you’ll get unlimited posts. We have to combat bots.
account may get nuked when hitting limits often.
>>7943807and people that would following and commission artist in certain spaces/communities.
I barely post something once a week, who has time for 50 a day
>>7943794artist, japs, jap artist. retweets counts as 50 posts as well.
>>7943791>daily limit of 50 postsOccasionally they come up with something good like revealing someone's region.
>>7943827>no more food tweets>no more food retweets>no more sky tweetsgood, fuck the japs
>>7943833>no shitty gacha pulls >no videogame clips>no pics of someone hand as they roam around buying shit and eating gookslopamen to that
>>7943840
>>7943794I was just about to ask this. Even meme posters don't pump that much regurgitated content each day.
>>7943820This clearly only affects bots and otherwise automated accounts that spamBut it has no point since they get blue checkmarks anyway
>>7943794bots and engagement farms
>>7943791Bots
>>7943820That picture doesn't actually say that though.
>>7943794Bots and third worlders that earn a living off engagement farming content.
>>7943820All this seems fine, except maybe the following limit of 5,000.I follow a tonne of art accounts, and have a fairly great time-line and recommendations because of it. I wouldn't be surprised if in my daily scroll of those, I've racked up 5000 or so accounts to follow.What does 'additional follow attempts are limited by account-specific ratios' even mean?
>>7943791>which screws over artist.good, I despise them>>7943963Twitter had to do this to counter bots and view farming
>>7943791shutup botsreal people don't spam 500 posts a daythis is to fight chinese bots
>>7943794since it includes retweets I wouldn't be surprised if the average active user was in the 30-40 range, actually.
There isn't even something worth posting once about in that shithole since everything is just engagementbait and drama
>>7943791Kek, the final death knell. Good riddance.
>>7943791How will I post my 70 complete, rendered artworks now?
you'd think this would be used to catch bots and other spammers but they always have the checkmark for some reason anyway so this doesn't affect themtwitter and musk were mistakes
total social media death
>>7944100>they always have the checkmark for some reason anywaythese bot accounts get the cheapest tier to get money and spam replies or whatever to make up the difference. Muskrat doesn't care about bots in the first place as long he gets money out of it. A certain crowd of retards will continue to defend him even when he lies about shit all the time.
>omg i hate musk muskrat elongated moss!>better log on Xitter tho gotta check my likes and subscriblles!
>>7944309exhibit A
>>7943791
>>7943833It's 50 ORIGINAL tweets, retweets fit in the 200 category.
>>7944309its almost like the app existed and had a loyal user base DECADES before that rat bought it to stroke his retarded ego.literally everyone remembers he was getting shit on daily for his stupid takes and posts. He literally bought it because he couldnt stand people not liking his retarded ass and even the first few weeks when he bought it, he would force his dumbass feed and posts to every single user on the app.it was the most pathetic thing ive ever witnessed on the internet and I follow a bunch of lolcows. He's the epitome of a lolcow, the fact his parents bred him slaves to make him rich doesnt change that. at the end of the day hes just a stupid retard who is too autistic to be liked by anyone he doesnt throw money at.
>>7943992they all have premium though
>>7943791i think it is a double move to make interactions more 'worthy' on top of fucking botshonestly they should've done it way before
>>7943992I'm getting off X again for a while: the last few days I've just seen people who should know better reposting rage bait slop, then you check the account's location and it's fucking Nigeria or India.I'll be happy to use it again when they let you block by country/ region.
I think the following limit is kinda bad. And if reposts count as posts it also sucks because I need more reposts.
>>7943791Wow, this is terrible. I post like once a week, so in the very likely scenario that I increase my posting habits by 350x this will really screw me over.
>>7944457>bots, propaganda, pushed narratives, drama cancer, engagement baiting under not musk>:D>bots, propaganda, pushed narratives, drama cancer, engagement baiting under musk>:((((((((to me it's just insane seeing posts like yours pop up from time to time here literally seething at the fag>i follow lolcowsah, it explains everything lollolcow chasers are even bigger lolcows no exception
>>7944525I'm not entirely sure what to think about capping followers. On one hand I feel like following that many people kind of muddies the water to the point any given follow is meaningless and the chances of even seeing any specific person shrinks dramatically unless you're on twitter 24/7, god forbid the sheer amount of trash any given person will spam retweet daily. On the other if people have been following thousands of others just to scroll twitter all day for years before muskfaggot bought it, who am I to judge. Even if it's going to result in a rather flawed timeline.
Musktwitter isn't really that bad
>>7944457This genuinely sounds like jealousy.
>>7944569>jeet bot accounts blue check spam>aie sloppa grok shit generator >taking away features to shill blue check>isn't that baduh-huh
>>7944569i mean where else does one amass a following easily
>>7944587tiktok
>omg twitter sucks!>keeps being on it 24/7 trying to figure out how to get rich and famous on itplay retarded games win cum in ass
