old:>>7918691
>>7944797
>>7944801
>>7944802
>>7944797she looks like she fucks uncles
>>7944824Seek help, your brain is sick.
>>7944829yeah, because I'm the one posting succulent little uncle fuckers
>>7944824Anon that’s a boy
>>7944824>>7944873Stop. Samefaging. Schizo.
>>7944902less fumes inhaley, more of meds availey
Back at it with the calligraphy lines
tried to copy the ico poster art on acrylics
>>7945150that's great, i think that illustration was actually inspired by another painting or style, don't remember who tho
>>7945150Did the same study ages ago, with acrylics as well.
>>7945150Beau travail
>>7945153
>>7945153Do Chirico, an El Greco like figure for Spanish surrealists. Italian painter preceding a major movement that tried to distance himself from them more and more as he got older (he eventually became something of a hacky realist like Bernard, after Gauguin abandoned France and Van Gogh was long dead)
>>7945170>>7945197wow really had no idea there was much story behind the illustration, I choosed it to study because of the warm liminal feeling plus the nostalgia component, something that scapes me with pure surrealism, though that chirico also has very interesting works, thanks you anons for the info
>struggling with color for a while now, realized I can't actually identify colors of what I'm looking at>decide to take my paint swatches on a walk and compare them to things to get a sense of bearing>mfw random flowers mog the shit out of cads and quinsI noticed flowers being crazy chromatic before, but I just brushed it off as receiving a shit ton of light, but no, a fucking poppy is redder than anything I have and random yellow and orange flowers are more yellow/orange than cadsgreens and blues are basically the only chromatic colors we have, apparentlymagenta is also very good, but I didn't come across any appropriate flowers to compare, maybe it's kinda shitty too
>>7945434Show me your values.
>>7945492spare me the reddit advice until you can post something that isn't shit
>>7945526>until you can post something that isn't shitThats the point, you cosmic retard, you cant even post something with decent values. Until then, you have no business talking about cads being too weak.
>>7945533>nooooo you don't have my permission to use color, you can only practice value without color because colors don't have value>hurr durr btwI'm better than everyone in this thread, so I'm not gonna take regurgitated reddit advice from a shitter lolstay mad and poor
based
>>7945536You are a pre-beg and a lol cow. But enough compliments.Your theory game is weak.You have my permission to paint with color, but your problems with color are based on your weak values. If you understood value, you would understand exposure. Of course no paint can compete with something lit directly by daylight. And of course its not necessary. Thats the first thing you learn. You dont copy the reality 1 to 1, you work with relations. The brightness of your cads, is what you supposed to exposure your painting to.>I can paint you the skin of Venus with mud, provided you let me surround it as I will.This famous quote describes the importance of the relations between the colors.The brightest possible red paint, would not add anything to the quality of your paintings, au contraire.
>>7945562nice redditpost, where's your work lol
>>7945566>reddit>pywBrian, Brian, Brian...
>>7945562>I couldUh-huh, just like his buttbuddy Ingres could learn to paint in one hour. Let's see his mud Venus.>According to records from the Musée National Eugène-Delacroix and his personal studio notes, Delacroix relied heavily on a specific set of foundational pigments:>Reds & Oranges: Vermilion, Cadmium Red, and his signature intense Cadmium Orange.>Yellows: Cadmium Yellow, Naples Yellow, and Yellow Ochre.>Blues: Prussian Blue and Cobalt Blue.How very curious.
>>7945582>Uh-huh, just like his buttbuddy Ingres could learn to paint in one hour.It is true, if you think about it.>Not only can color, which is under fixed laws, be taught like music, but it is easier to learn than drawing, whose elaborate principles cannot be taught.
>>7945584Sure buddy, just all the permabegs could totally render but just choose not to because it's beneath them. Fuck off.Also, the irony of using Delacroix to promote fundamentals when Ingres famously got an aneurysm and spilled coffee on himself because Delacroix was a shitter at drawing whom he considered a rendermonkey.
>>7945584>another reddit quotethis is why I'll always be better at painting than you lol
Why do these threads always turn into this
>>7945588Low resolution thinking. Its not about his rendering or drawing skill. Its about the relationships between colors and and values. The main point is, if you cant paint nice flowers with cads, you are a retard and the only solution is to kill yourself.The most obvious noob trap is the gear trap.If you think your yellow cad is not strong enough, to paint nice flowers, the solution is to paint them with yellow ocker instead.
>>7945595Brian has a humiliation fetish.
>>7945596You totally obliterated that strawman, too bad you made it up and nobody said any of that retarded shit. Pliny cried about nufangled painters using colors other than the Appelles palette and bemoaned indigo and red, the materials were nonetheless superior and allowed for better paintings no matter what the retard believed.>hurr durr someone painted with red dirt and yellow dirt, therefore we don't need real colorFuck off.
>>7945599You lying bastard.That's what you identified as your problem.>struggling with color for a whileThat was your solution>mfw random flowers mog the shit out of cads and quinsNo, you fentanyl punk, cads are not the reason why you strugling with color, its your skill.
>>7945606Take your meds, schizo, that doesn't say what your nigger brain thinks it says and you're arguing with multiple people, none of which are Brian, who doesn't even use cads or pricy paint afaik. I think he said he uses BS, vermillion, naples yellow and prussian blue.Why the fuck are you even in these threads, you literally don't even paint anymore, fuck off to your digicuck cope thread.
>>7945608Well, i cant deny a spark of logic in what youre saying, maybe i mixed some people up, Brian.I lost interest in digital painting overnight, now im planing my big comeback to oil. Anyway, you dont wanting me here, is reason enough for me to stay.
>>7945611What I don't want is you shitting up the thread to compensate for literally not painting because you feel like the fraud that you are. Pick up a brush, fag.
>>7945613You are projecting way too hard.
>>7945619You're literally here every fucking day seething at imaginary Brians while literally not painting. Get a grip, retard.
>>7945595
>>7945434retard
For all the people actually drawing, keep doing what you're doing and godspeed, friends. We need you now more than ever to combat the evergrowing flood of AIslop and digital slop.
>>7945890no, we need to gatekeep our art and destroy them before we die so that people wont be able to see and enjoy art anymore. Once artists have dropped their ego and show/post their art only within fellow artists circle/community and kicked away normies and non-artist from it, that will be the day where art have won against ai slop and artist will reach their sovereignty - detaching themselves from the curse of servitude towards humanity
>>7945926just because god gives an artist a talent and vision to identify the illness of this world it doesnt mean that artists are obliged to make the world a better place and clean someone elses mess like a janny
>>7945926My post was for the people that draw and you don't draw.
Pastels portrait practice, I somehow found them harder to work with than oil pastels, while I could have sworn it was the other way around years ago when I first tried both
>>7946050Good work, fellow orientalist.
>Good work, fellow orientalist.
modern art is possibly a legit 1% attempt of mental warfare against the general goyslave population. they're sadistically taking a dump on you with mind viruses.
Are water-mixable oil paints good? I want to attempt some Frazetta-esque pictures that would be better as traditional paintings instead of digital illustrations, or the mixed-media things I've done in the past, with ink and acrylics and POCs (pencils of colour). I'd just use oils but I dread turpentine vapours
>>7946225No, they are vastly inferior to regular oils. You don’t -have- to use turp/OMS. And if you do you’re pretty safe as long as you properly ventilate your workspace.
>>7946236>You don’t -have- to use turp/OMSYou kinda do if you rarely paint
>>7946116I made a video on this topic.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7j0gj-UIo9g>>7946225Its a useless gimmick. If you need water salability, buy a medium that can do that, i dont see the need to buy extra tubes.
