[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: rateV5.png (67 KB, 456x855)
67 KB PNG
post, rate, get rated
>>
I’m high /adv/.
>>
File: bbn01.png (1.92 MB, 1131x1600)
1.92 MB PNG
>>
>>8012701
low-mid /int/
>>
>>
>>8012706
high /beg/
>>
>>8012701
This is some fantastic line work. Looks effortless af.
Are you /pro/?
>>
>>8012714
No, he’s low-mid/int/. See?
>>8012704
>>
>>8012701
this is very much pro work.
>>
>>8012715
FUCK, i forgot that you only get to be adv/pro if you limit your work to unstylized animals, women and architecture, and throw in overly detailed bullshit because thats totally your own personal flair and not what others forced you to do through cyber bullying
>>
>>8012706
low to mid beg
>>
>>8012718
Well don’t forget it again!
>>
>>8012706
low mid /beg/
mid high /beg/

yawn
>>
File: 1780243484671159.jpg (247 KB, 1920x1080)
247 KB JPG
>>8012717
>>8012718
Negative, if you want actual pro work just browse artstation, you wont cause you are a biothch
>>
>>8012706
mid beg
>>8012701
low to mid int
>>
>>8012701
mid int
>>8012706
high beg
>>8012718
no it clearly has errors that are being masked by stylization
>>
>>8012725
>pro work
>proceeds to post high beg
Classy
>>
File: 1765642233825130.jpg (618 KB, 1920x1393)
618 KB JPG
Another /adv/ drawing just to put things into perspective.
>>8012701
>>8012704
>>8012717
>>8012714

>Competence in most fundamentals but fails at more challenging poses, backgrounds or compositions.

High Beginner. Horrible artstyle, you can tell he wasted years if not decades. Such is the way of the dogshit eater that has fun and never actually learns
>>
>>8012732
it's very obvious you're the guy that posted it. Maybe get your head out of your ass and realize you have perspective errors that are making it look int
>>
>>8012732
/adv/ artists can draw in any style. I think it's a good gorillaz copy cat drawing no? 0 mistakes.
>>
>>8012734
you're just giving them ammo to defend their stylized drawing. At least choose something stylized that has very strong fundamentals rather than this highly technical art
>>
>>8012715
>>8012718
salty anon, the scale is a technical standard only, the drawing is obviously very lovely and technically competent, but it's not showing technical mastery.
not everyone has to shoot for technical mastery, and many successful and influential artists are not masters, but technical components are simply what they are
>>
File: 1759245035584983.jpg (925 KB, 1920x2560)
925 KB JPG
>>8012737
The Gorillaz drawing is highly stylized and used in the industry.
Going to be literally impossible to find a "whacky ugly westerner" drawing in artstation , reminds me of the ugly onyplays drawings.
>>
>>8012714
I draw for a living, but this artwork is not representative of my paid work, as it was done free of charge as a present for a friend. Just the last thing I drew.

I'd rate my best work as high /int/.
>>
File: file.png (486 KB, 447x447)
486 KB PNG
>>8012744
that's pretty fair and humble of you. I also think if you do make a living off your work, that's truly the biggest flex you can have, even moreso than technical mastery depending on how well off your art lets you live. Your work reminds me a little bit of like a simplified Jurion Joel
>>
>>8012749
>Your work reminds me a little bit of like a simplified Jurion Joel
Good eye. I love his art and he's definitely had some influences on me. Especially the thick "messy" lines.
>>
File: 1776510625731.jpg (1.15 MB, 1672x2508)
1.15 MB JPG
>>8012706
Here's another example
>>
I have the power
>>
>>8012734
>Such is the way of the dogshit eater that has fun and never actually learns
what a pathetic Misrable tranny
how does someone like you even do arting all the hours doing study's and you don't even enjoy it? Pitiful.
>>
>>8012749
>>8012759
>>8012826

>that's pretty fair and humble of you
Drawing a dogshit beg picture and then trying to double down by saying that you make money out of it is the literal opposite of being humble
>>
>>8012848
It's trying to pretend that it's /adv/ by the metric of making money which is not, it's high beg.

Artists truly are the most miserable, dogshitting trash people on the planet. Hobby died when the leftist arrived.
>>
>>8012815
Unlimited pre/beg/ artworks
>>
Fuck you guys. These ratings are retarded anyway.
>>
>>8012890
Of course lol. That's just a pyw thread, where beglets can pretend to be competent art critics.
>>
>>8012805
good drawing skills here but the way you lassod the white out of the picture is ugly, high beg i think
i am the one who said low to mid beg earlier
>>
>>8012949
frankly, i would bet 20$ that my nodraw mom has better eyes than you, after all she gave birth to me.
>>
>>8012958
I initially made it as a sticker
Unfortunately the file size was too large for most websites hence I screenshotted it
>>
>>8012701
>>8012706
In what world are these beg or low int? I know /ic/ shouldn't be taken seriously but I didn't think it was this bad
>>
>>8012732
you're just as retarded as well. I know this board is filled with dunning-krugers, but come on....
>>
>>8013069
See >>8012961
you just have shit taste.
>>
>>8012690
This chart is actually awful. The gay little adv/pro division needs to be done away with and replaced with low, mid, and high /pro/.
>high /int/: Can only be faulted in very subtle ways
Pure retardation, this is the actual definition of /pro/fessional work. high /int/ means your skillset is on the cusp of being being considered professional, but is still inadequate in a lot of ways.
>>
>>8013098
this but things never change on 4chan
>>
>>8013103
pyw
>>
>>8013122
No u
>>
File: IMG_3422.jpg (228 KB, 776x1119)
228 KB JPG
>>
>>8013098
/pro/fessional means nothing and it's why retards always bring up middling twitter artists and shit thinking they are smart
>>
>>8013143
the more years that pass the shittier this looks

high beg imo
>>
>>8013143
Why do people act like this is bad? I mean sure, it looks generic, but in terms of skill isn't this pretty good?
>>
>>8013197
It being generic is kinda the point.
>>
>>8012690
I would kill to even just be low /int/ but my intelligence caps me at /prebeg/
>>
>>8013258
Nobody is "too stupid" to learn the fundamentals. It's about reps.
>>
What's the point of these threads if almost everyone on this board is /beg/?
>but maybe I'm an /int/!
If you have to ask, you're not.
>>
File: suika2.png (452 KB, 692x1000)
452 KB PNG
/prebeg/ or low /beg/? explain why if you don't mind. what delineates prebeg and low beg in your point of view?
>>
>>8013272
prebeg id say. well the anatomy and the composition and the colors and the linework are all really bad and amateur. do some master studies
>>
>>8013274
i'm kind of in the beginning of learning anatomy. all i know is gesture and the most basic level of construction and i have only just started to study those. i kind of studied the structure of the face a little a bit beforehand. i only started learning this stuff like yesterday.

i'll check out some masters and see if there's a style i want to imitate.
>>
>>8013278
anatomy is a requirement for gesture, please just look at naked people and use your brain to draw them, thats all
>>
>>8013264
Not that guy but im legitimately stupid and struggle a lot to learn. Ive been drawing for many many years now.

I've done the drills, drawn the boxes, studied hampton, studied perspective, etc.

I just cant put everything together and the knowledge never really stick. Especially construction related methods.

>>8013272
I would say you're low beg personally. I think you started to grasp proportion at a minimum, but the understanding of form isnt there etc.
>>
File: 1639368381538.png (616 KB, 635x621)
616 KB PNG
>>8013264
>Nobody is "too stupid" to learn the fundamentals.
>>
>>8013282
i'll try to learn form. i could probably get some mileage out of improving the mannequin stage of my construction and making sure it looks plausible and 3d.
>>
>>8013272
Low beg, like someone who just started drawing a few months ago.
>>
>>8013298
that's pretty accurate. the sum total of time i have spent actively trying to improve is at most a few months. i have taken one college art class that taught some kind of drawing on the right side of the brain curriculum but it was 15 years ago now. i probably don't have the neuroplasticity anymore to get good at anything but i still try.
>>
actually, i shouldn't knock people in their 30's trying to learn art because my mom didn't learn to paint until she was like 35 and she got to like high beg level in no time at all without any digital crutches. i probably inherited at least a fraction of her power. i think it was basically raw talent that carried her. same with my sister. i don't think they ever really studied fundies.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.