[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/int/ - International


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: f1d.png (16 KB, 767x502)
16 KB
16 KB PNG
Post your gubermint's budget balance, compare and discuss
>https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/government-budget
>>
>>
File: grim.png (21 KB, 866x455)
21 KB
21 KB PNG
hardly news i guess
wish i could zoom out enough to see the brief blip of blue under clinton, but the site wants me to buy premium or some shit
>>
File: 8745665.png (116 KB, 1543x1163)
116 KB
116 KB PNG
>>214619685
2023-24 Labor Party.

It really is easy under Albanese.
>>
File: file.png (18 KB, 526x448)
18 KB
18 KB PNG
>>214619856
The gradual pivot to surpluses is intredasting.
Aren't republicans supposed to be the conservatives and the donkeys the big spenders?
>>
>>214620216
we aren't gonna see a surplus any time soon. the local trend looks good just because of the spending spike during covid.
>Aren't republicans supposed to be the conservatives and the donkeys the big spenders?
LOL no, they just market themselves that way and proles love it. the only time we've haven't had a deficit in recent history was under a democrat.
>>
>>214619856
jesus
>>
This thread was moved to >>>/pol/515049924



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.