>steals 45 trillion from india>still ends up in 3rd world conditon
Karma. Jai Hind.
>>215317817yeah i think karma is reali hope it will helps u to be good in everyday.be kind for anons
They had to pay to end the slave trade THOUGH, even though they didn't start it, were victims of it, and it continues to exist unofficially
>>215317792>steals 45 trillion from IndiaLiterally made up.
>>215317907how much was it?
>>215317792What 30 years of unhinged neoliberalism does to a mf. baka
>>215317930bout tree fiddy
>>215317970i knew it
>>215317907Can you disprove the statement?
>>215318015the man who made that statement killed his wife
>>215317930>>215318015The “$45 trillion stolen by Britain” is a meme number made up by Indian nationalist economist Utsa Patnaik.jeets use it as proof of their eternal victimhood, but i'ts a meme. India didn’t even have 45 trillion to steal, and the calculation isn’t about actual money it’s a speculative estimate of “economic damage,” which includes imaginary growth India “would have had” without British rule. In other words: Britain is accused of stealing money that never existed.The argument rests on the largely agricultural India’s share of world GDP dropping from ~20% to ~6% which happened while Europe industrialized and global economic weight shifted. While we did do economic damage, its no where fucking near 45 trillion.The number is just jeets being jeets and straight up fucking lying.The real number that we actually took and benefited from was about 300 to 400 billion(and thats before you deduct the amount we re-invested in india for things like railways). It is still a lot, dont get me wrong. But the "muh 45 gorillion" is literally impossible.
>>215317792>They stole a gajillion dollars saar>Ignore all the development of the Raj saar
>>215318289okay so how much did Britain steal from India
Genuinely wasted money for wasteful people. Australia is an Anglo ethnostate and it has produced zero contributions all while losing in military conflict against LITERAL birds.
>>215318565Did you just... Not read the post?
>>215318608no
>>215318038I now trust him more.
>>215318565in net terms? nothing, probably. if anything they ended up accelerating its economic growth overall.
>>215318899I wouldn't go that far
>2 billion destitute subhumans>piss shit and trash everywhere>crumbling infrastructure how is this worth 45 trillion, seems like a net negative to me
>>215317792you mean they stole 45 trillion and 200 million slaves from the mughals
>>215317792mleccha aren't CEO's like us, they can't manage an economy/business, that's why they need jews
>>215318587Australia innovations have had more impact on the world than Indian ones since Indian independence
>>215318994in isolation, there would have been no industrial revolution in india. industrialization came by way of british colonization.
I hate when people make up these historical figures>BRITISHERS STOLE ONE GAZILLION GORILLION BAJILLION GODZILLION TRILLION METRIC TONS OF DIAMONDS WORTH FROM AFRICA!!!no one can quantify this shit, stop larping fucking clown
>>215317792wasn't it 870 trillion o algo saar
>>215317792They didn't steal them. They went there willingly
>>215318289is that 300-400b adjusted for inflation
>>215320878yes, 300 - 400 billion in todays USD net profit.I read somewhere that the empire's projected expenditures went up 2 pounds for every 1 pounds it was projected to make towards the very end. But im not sure how true this is i didnt do that deep a dive into it.But the colonies lack of profitability was one of the main reasons we decolonised.
we did that
>>215318289>>215321285Any texts/sources about this? I want to read more for myself.>t. history autist
>>215317792It's more like 450 trillion, obviously
>>215321836Sadly Utsa Patnaik never published an actual economic report (odd, that), But the claim was popularised by journalists and other writers.She gave a bunch of interviews though that you can look for. I forgot to mention but shes also a Marxist communist so take her estimations with a grain of salt because communists dont understand economics.There are plenty of economic reports about the British empire though if you look for them. But be careful, some of them, especially the historical ones, are partly made up and contain number-fudging.Also be careful of modern anglophile sources that claim "we wuz good guys and colonialism was akshually good" because thats also not true (soruces like Niall Ferguson).This being a particularly hot-button topic theres a bunch of propaganda on both sides so be careful if you're going to go diving into this because half of what you read is bullshit revisionism.
>>215322229Cheers m8, thanks.
>>215317792it end up third world BECAUSE they went to indiathey do not have authentic british thirdworldism they are basically transplanting pakistan into the british isles
>>215317792>steals 45 trillion from indiaIt's ok, soon they will have 45 million indians
The only failure the brits ever did to india is failing to teach them how to use toilets.
>45 trillionthats a lot of gift cards
