If the darker races are inferior in intelligence then does that morally justify treating them in an inferior manner? Why or why not?
>>215368667>jump around ooga booga>get a chain on your neck
No. Moral justification is not contingent on intelligence. Ethical principles such as human dignity, rights, and equality do not depend on cognitive ability. Infants, people with disabilities, or the elderly may have diminished or different cognitive capacities, yet this does not justify inferior treatment. The premise is scientifically false. Claims that certain races are "inferior in intelligence" lack valid biological grounding. Intelligence is influenced by complex interactions of genetics, environment, culture, and opportunity. Racial hierarchies of intelligence are pseudoscientific constructs. Even if the premise were hypothetically true, it would not yield moral license. Superiority in one domain does not confer ethical authority to dominate or degrade. Morality requires consistent application of principles that respect personhood.
>>215368667no, because most apes are whiter than me (except bonobo maybe)
>>215368813>hierarchies of intelligence are pseudoscientific constructsSo go live in Africa
>>215368667No? The solution to stupidity isn't violence it's education. Only a stupid person would be unable to make that obvious discernment.
>>215368667 >Why or why not?
