>>215381949I can smell the curry through the screen
>>215381949how high chance is it that this account is run by an Indian incel?
>>21538197795%
>>215381949Feudalism was literally so bad that EVERY system ever created has been better.
>implying monarchy with real power wasn't a crapshoot dependent on whther your monarch was intelligent or cruel or a gibbering retardCome on now.This is historically illiterate anyway, feudalism exactly as that pyramid probably only existed for like 2 centuries specifically in Northern France and Southern England.
>>215381949Of course a brain dead street shitting underman would belive in feudalism
>>215381977≥90%
>>215381973>>215381977>>215381983>>215381988>>215382073Do you have any arguments, samefag. Even a currynigger (he/xim/they probably isn't) can be right
>>215382147post vishnu statue with timestamp
>>215382147>4 posts made within 1 minute are all samefaggingGo back wherever you came from, newfag.
>>215381949Ancap propaganda has become incredibly retarded since Indians got access to xitter
Imagine slicing in half some fucking serf with a greatsword because he stole some bread.
>>215382040>feudalism exactly as that pyramid probably only existed for like 2 centuries specifically in Northern France and Southern England.tell me more about feudalism. where to find about the different types across different lands?
>>215381949And no jeets. Get rid of all jeets forcefully or not
>>215381949>*orders a lake of peasant blood"
>>215381949I don't understand. Why would the monarch's interests be tied to the people? Why wouldn't he exploit them for his own benefit
>>215382147SAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAR
>>215381988TRUE!
>>215381949Point by point analysis of this Xwitter post:1) Still true today.2) It wasn't and today it is even more decentralised. 3) Count the wars on this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars:_1000%E2%80%9314994) Monarchs constantly borrowed money or promised lands, privileges & titles to other nobles in order to secure their position.5) Monarchs only cared about peasants when they could play them against a different noble. >>215382995NtA but in Germany there were different types of serfs with different rights and privleges - as well as free peasants. Your best bet would be to pick a country and start reading about the societal models of the time period you are interested in.
>>215383445they would kill him
I've spent the last few days obsessively probing ChatGPT about the feudal system, watching videos on it,, reading up on it. Focused mainly on Medieval England.It seems like in a lot of weird ways it's not that different to our society. Even the total tax burden (When you account for labour on the lord's demense and convert it to a cash tax rate) comes awfully close to the median 37% you see today. The income differences between qualified tradesmen and unqualified day labourers is about the same. There was even a sort of welfare state and NEETbux in the cities, and there was pressure in the king's court to wrangle the NEETs back into work. There's an article on the Mises Institute talking about welfare fraud stretching back to olden times, and some pepeNEET was just coasting by for years not working. I think it was in the high middle ages or the early renaissance, but still.I remember someone on kohlchan way back in like 2021 posted the daily wages for different occupations in 13th century England, and the price of different products. Just roughly estimating and averaging out the wide fluctuations (rent was basically nothing while clothes and tools were giga expensive), being lower middle class seemed to be like living on $12,000 NZ today (Probably $16,000 now inflation has hit). Which is shit, certainly, but it doesn't seem to be that far off modern thirdie tier.
>>215381949Techno-feudalism is the future
>>215381949good morning>>215381973gmorning
>>215385313Peasant revolts don't have a good track record.>>215385511The fact that you factor in the labor services people in some sort of bondage had to conduct for their liege elevates you above most people who look into this subject.
>>215382147cum the fuck on>marble statue avatar>"traditionalist" username>advocating for a caste systemthat's 100% an indian pretending to be a westoid
>>215382147>Do you have any arguments, samefagYes. The last point in the OP pic is bullshit. Monarchs in the feudal system weren't benevolent dictators that only wanted the best for the people. They were at least as selfish as any modern leader if not more.
>>215381949>>215382147good morning saar's
>>215385642Peasant revolts typically succeed in getting moderate reforms passed, but the radicals Lollard tier ones hold out and get fucking wrecked after everyone else goes home.
>>215385937>Peasant revolts typically succeed in getting moderate reforms passedI can't think of a single instance where this occured. Do you have any examples?
>>215386072Right here>On 13 June 1381 Tyler with other rebels of Kent crossed London Bridge to enter the city, as Stow recorded in his Summary and Annals. Once in the city, they attacked civil targets, destroying legal records, opening prisons, sacking homes, and killing individuals they thought were associated with the royal government.[8][9] In response, King Richard II (then 14 years old) met with the rebels on 14 June and agreed to make many concessions and to give full pardons to all those involved in the rebellion. While some of the rebels were satisfied by the king's promises and dispersed, Tyler and his followers were not. On 15 June Tyler and his Kentish forces met King Richard at Smithfield, outside London. There, Tyler spoke personally with the king and put forward his demands. At first, the meeting seems to have gone well, with Tyler treating the king in a friendly, if overly familiar, manner, and Richard agreeing the rebels "should have all that he could fairly grant">However, tensions quickly rose. According to a contemporary chronicler, Tyler acted contemptuously, calling for a flagon of water to rinse his mouth "because of the great heat that he was in" and when he received the water "he rinsed his mouth in a very rude and disgusting fashion before the King's face". Sir John Newton (a servant of the king) insulted Tyler by calling him "the greatest thief and robber in all of Kent". Tyler attacked Newton but was restrained and arrested by the Lord Mayor of London, William Walworth. Tyler then attempted to stab Walworth who was saved by his armour. Walworth slashed Tyler across the neck and head with his sword, and another of the king's servants, possibly Ralph de Standish, stabbed Tyler again, severely wounding him. Tyler managed to ride 30 yards before he fell from his horse.
>>215386155You should have read a bit further:>On 20 June, the King's uncle, Thomas of Woodstock, and Robert Tresilian, the replacement Chief Justice, were given special commissions across the whole of England.[221] Thomas oversaw court cases in Essex, backed up by a substantial military force as resistance was continuing and the county was still in a state of unrest.[225] Richard himself visited Essex, where he met with a rebel delegation seeking confirmation of the grants the King had given at Mile End.[226] Richard rejected them, allegedly telling them that "rustics you were and rustics you are still. You will remain in bondage, not as before, but incomparably harsher".[226][nb 13] Tresilian soon joined Thomas, and carried out 31 executions in Chelmsford, then travelled to St Albans in July for further court trials, which appear to have utilised dubious techniques to ensure convictions.>The royal government and Parliament began to re-establish the normal processes of government after the revolt; as the historian Michael Postan describes, the uprising was in many ways a "passing episode".[241] On 30 June, the King ordered England's serfs to return to their previous conditions of service, and on 2 July the royal charters signed under duress during the rising were formally revoked.The only good that came out of it was that Richard agreed to reform the royal officials who were corrupt an overbearing in the execution of their duties.
>>215386485>"rustics you were and rustics you are still. You will remain in bondage, not as before, but incomparably harsherlmaoImagine getting told this by some 14 year old and having to abide by it because he's the king
